Hoare Miller and Co. Ltd. Vs. the Assistant Collector of Customs and ors.

Decided On : Jul-07-1975

Court : Kolkata

LAW: Article 226 of the Constitution Messrs. Hoare Miller & Co, Section 113(d, the Customs Act, Section 114, the Customs Act, Section 3, Section 113(d, Section 114, Section 11, Section 113(d, Section 114, Section 3, Article 226 of the Constitution, Section 3, Section 3, Section 11, the Customs Act, Article 77 of the Constitution, the Amendment Rules, the General Clauses Act, Article 77(2, Constitution, the General Clauses Act, Section 3, Section 3, Section 3, Section 3, Section 3 of the Act, Section 11, the Customs Act, Section 11, the Customs Act, the Charter of the United Nations, Section 3 of the Act, the Charter of the United Nations, Section 11, the Customs Act, Section 11, the Customs Act, Section 3, Section 11, the Customs Act, Section 3, Section 11, the Customs Act, Section 11, the Customs Act, Section 11, the Customs Act, Section 3, Section 11, the Customs Act, Section 3, Section 11, the Customs Act 1962, Section 3, Section 11(2, the Customs Act, Section 11, the Customs Act, Section 3, Section 19 of the Sea Customs Act, the Sea Customs Act, Section 3

ORG: ORDERSabyasachi Mukharji, the Assistant Collector of Customs, inter alia, Zambia Associates Messrs, the Government of India, Hoare Miller & Co. Ltd., Sec, Hoare Mills & Co. Ltd., the Ministry of Commerce, Central Government, Im-ports & Exports, Controller, the Central Government, the Central Government, Exports (Control) Act, The Central Government, the Central Government, the Central Government, the Central Government, the Central Government, Reliance, the Authentication (Orders and Other Instruments), the Authentication (Orders and Other Instruments) Rules, inter alia, the Central Government, the Central Gevrnment, the Central Government, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Central Government, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, State, State, the Central Government, the Central Government, the Central Government, Court, Courts, Bengal Immunity Co. Ltd., State of Bihar, AC 468, the Central Government, Court, Court, the Central Government, The Central Government, Karl Ettlinger & Co., Ohagandas & Co, AIR 1915 Bom 232, Government, the Government of India's

ORDINAL: 5th, firstly, Secondly, thirdly, first, first, third, 7th, 5th

DATE: October, 1967, 1962, 1962, 17-11-65, 1947, 1947, a week, 1962, 1962, 1947, 18 of 1947, 1947, 1947, 1947, '3, 1962, 52 of 1962, 1947, 1947, 1955, 1968, 1947, 1965, 1958, ' 5, 1965, 1958, 1958, 1965, 1947, 1947, 1939, 1962, 1962, 1962, 1947, 1962, 1947, 1947, 1962, 1947, 1962, 1962, 1962, 1947, 1947, 1962, 1947, 1878, July 24. 1914, 11s, September, the 7th September, 1914, August, 17th April, 1964, 1947, the 5th October, 1967, October, 1967, six weeks

CARDINAL: three, three, 2, 9/65, 3, 2, 3, three, three, 1, 2, 1, 3, 4, 6, 8, 2, 25, 26, 1952CriLJ1269, 6., 1955]2SCR603, 1957CriLJ1014, 2, one, 2, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 1, 8., 1, 1, 9, 10, 11, 1914, 12, 13, 14

PRODUCT: Roods

PERSON: Rhodesia, J. N. Barnett & Co., Hoare Miller & Co. Ltd., IPC, Sabanayagam, Controller, Gazette, Gazette, Controller, Controller, C. T. A. Filial v. H. P. Lohia, AIR1957Cal83, Controller, E. G. Bar-say, Jog Naik, P. B Pardasani, Ladore v. Bennet, Gazette

GPE: Rhodesia, Rhodesia, Rhodesia, India, Rhodesia, Rhodesia, India, Rhodesia, India, India, India, Bombay, Bombay, Rhodesia, Sarwan, Singh, Singh v. State of Punjab, Bombay, Antwerp

FAC: Controller

NORP: Joint, tomean

WORK_OF_ART: 1958 Rules

QUANTITY: one thousand tons, 6 d. per ton