Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Mahammad Faiz Chowdhury Vs. E.F. Sandys

Decided On : Jul-25-1902

Court : Kolkata

LAW: Section 95, Section 98, Section 98 of the Act, Section 98, Section 98, Section 103 of the Act, Section 103, Section 102, Section 188 of the Act, Section 98 of the Act, Section 103, the Amending Act, Section 98, Section 100 of the Act, Rule 5, Section 98, Section 100, The Section 98, Section 98, Rule 4, Section 100 of the Act, Rule 5, Rule 4, Rule 4

PERSON: J.1, Mahammad Faiz Chowdhury, E. F. Sandys, Mahammad Faiz, Sandys, E. F. Sandys, Taluk, Honour, Sandys, Geidt

GPE: Tipperah, Clause, J.12

LOC: the District Judge, the District Judge, the District Judge, the District Judge, the District Judge, the District Judge:8, the District Judge, the District Judge, the District Judge.13, the District Judge, the District Judge, the District Judge, the District Judge, the District Judge

CARDINAL: 5,482-15, 3, 3, 5, 5, one, two, two, one, one, 5,982.15, 3, two, 414, 4

ORDINAL: first, second

ORG: Court, Clauses, the Local Government, Legislature, the High Court, The High Court, the High Court, Durgacharan Taluk, the High Court, the High Court, Court, the High Court, Calcutta Counsel

DATE: 1885, three years, the 7th January 1898, 2nd-February, the 31st January 1898, the 31st January 1898, maintainable.10, three years

EVENT: the Record of Rights

MONEY: a Record of Rights

PRODUCT: Rule 4

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //