Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Mahammad Faiz Chowdhury Vs. E.F. Sandys
Decided On : Jul-25-1902
Court : Kolkata
LAW: Section 95, Section 98, Section 98 of the Act, Section 98, Section 98, Section 103 of the Act, Section 103, Section 102, Section 188 of the Act, Section 98 of the Act, Section 103, the Amending Act, Section 98, Section 100 of the Act, Rule 5, Section 98, Section 100, The Section 98, Section 98, Rule 4, Section 100 of the Act, Rule 5, Rule 4, Rule 4
PERSON: J.1, Mahammad Faiz Chowdhury, E. F. Sandys, Mahammad Faiz, Sandys, E. F. Sandys, Taluk, Honour, Sandys, Geidt
GPE: Tipperah, Clause, J.12
LOC: the District Judge, the District Judge, the District Judge, the District Judge, the District Judge, the District Judge:8, the District Judge, the District Judge, the District Judge.13, the District Judge, the District Judge, the District Judge, the District Judge, the District Judge
CARDINAL: 5,482-15, 3, 3, 5, 5, one, two, two, one, one, 5,982.15, 3, two, 414, 4
ORDINAL: first, second
ORG: Court, Clauses, the Local Government, Legislature, the High Court, The High Court, the High Court, Durgacharan Taluk, the High Court, the High Court, Court, the High Court, Calcutta Counsel
DATE: 1885, three years, the 7th January 1898, 2nd-February, the 31st January 1898, the 31st January 1898, maintainable.10, three years
EVENT: the Record of Rights
MONEY: a Record of Rights
PRODUCT: Rule 4