Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Murari M. Mukherjee and ors. Vs. Prokash Ch. Chatterjee

Decided On : Mar-10-1949

Court : Kolkata

LAW: Section 29, Section 2, Section 2, Section 2, Section 2, Section 2, Section 2, Section 2, Section 2, Section 2, the Bengal Tenancy Act, the Bengal Tenancy Act

ORG: P.B. Mukharji, Calcutta, the Calcutta Thika Tenancy Act, Court, Calcutta Thika Tenancy Act, Calcutta, the Calcutta Thika Tenancy Ordinance, the Calcutta Thika Tenancy Act, Uriya, Uriya, the Bengal Tenancy Act, the Calcutta Thika Tenancy Ordinance, the Calcutta Thika Tenancy Act

PERSON: J.1, Gouri Mitter, Gouri Mitter, Mitter, Mitter, Mitter, Calcutta Thika Tenancy Act, Mitter, Mitter, Mitter, Rishikesh Law v. Satishchandra A. I. R, Mitter, Manmotha Nath v., Anath Bandu, C. W. N. 201, A. I. R., Mitter, Mitter, Mitter

CARDINAL: 235/1, 20, only one, two, 5, two, 5, 5, 5, 5, 1949.9, two, One, 9, 123, 64, 482, 213, 1949.12, 1, 2, 3, 5, 2, six

FAC: Bowbazar Street, Bowbazar Street, Bowbazar Street

DATE: 15 years ending on 30th June 1947, 25th April 1947, the expiry of the month of June 1947, three months, April to June 1947.2, 1949, 1st July 1932, 25th April 1947, 1949, monthly, 1949, 1948, 1st July 1932, 10 years, 6 years, 1948, 6) 1919 Cal, 1948, six months', the last 15 years, six months

PRODUCT: Calcutta, province.10

ORDINAL: first

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //