Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Camellia Tea Group Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Decided On : Nov-06-1990

Court : Kolkata

LAW: Section 256(1, Rule 8, Rule 8(1, Rule 24, Section 4(3)(viii, Rule 8

PERSON: Ajit K. Sengupta, B. Gupta, B. Gupta, B. Gupta, B. Gupta, B. Gupta

NORP: J.1, Indian

DATE: 1961, the assessment year 1081-82, 1962, December 2, 1980, this year, April 17, 1980, April 18, 1980, 1962, the current season, season, '5, 1922

ORG: the Appellate Tribunal, Messrs. National Insurance (P.) Ltd., the Calcutta High Court, CIT, the High Court, the Calcutta High Court, Department, Tribunal, Departmental, the Calcutta High Court, Reliance, the Calcutta High Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Calcutta High Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, inter alia, Bhagabati Prasad Banerjee

CARDINAL: 3,13,410, 8, 2, 3,13,410, 3,13,410, 1969]74ITR337(Cal, three, three, 1969]74ITR337(Cal, 3,13,410 as, 1969]74ITR337(Cal, 8, 1969]74ITR337(Cal, 1969]74ITR337(Cal, 338, two, 338, 339, 1922.'7, 1962.8

LOC: Darjeeling

GPE: assessee, J.10

MONEY: 100 per cent, 100 per cent, 50 per cent, 50 per cent

PERCENT: 50%

QUANTITY: 4 kgs, 1 kg

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //