Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Camellia Tea Group Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Decided On : Nov-06-1990
Court : Kolkata
LAW: Section 256(1, Rule 8, Rule 8(1, Rule 24, Section 4(3)(viii, Rule 8
PERSON: Ajit K. Sengupta, B. Gupta, B. Gupta, B. Gupta, B. Gupta, B. Gupta
NORP: J.1, Indian
DATE: 1961, the assessment year 1081-82, 1962, December 2, 1980, this year, April 17, 1980, April 18, 1980, 1962, the current season, season, '5, 1922
ORG: the Appellate Tribunal, Messrs. National Insurance (P.) Ltd., the Calcutta High Court, CIT, the High Court, the Calcutta High Court, Department, Tribunal, Departmental, the Calcutta High Court, Reliance, the Calcutta High Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Calcutta High Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, inter alia, Bhagabati Prasad Banerjee
CARDINAL: 3,13,410, 8, 2, 3,13,410, 3,13,410, 1969]74ITR337(Cal, three, three, 1969]74ITR337(Cal, 3,13,410 as, 1969]74ITR337(Cal, 8, 1969]74ITR337(Cal, 1969]74ITR337(Cal, 338, two, 338, 339, 1922.'7, 1962.8
LOC: Darjeeling
GPE: assessee, J.10
MONEY: 100 per cent, 100 per cent, 50 per cent, 50 per cent
PERCENT: 50%
QUANTITY: 4 kgs, 1 kg