Perfect Engineering Works Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Decided On : Jul-27-1995

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

LAW: GP 113, Section 35E of the Central Excise Act, Section 11D, Section 11A. (ii, Section 11A, Section 11A, Section 35E, Section 11A and 11B, Section 35E, Section 11B, Section 11A, Section 11B, Section 11A, Section 11B(3, Section 11B, Section 11B, Section 11B(2, Section 11B, Article 136, Section 11B(2, Section 12B, Section 11B(3, Section 11B, Section 11B, Act 40 of 1991, Act 40 of 1991, Section 11B, Section 11B(3, Section 11B(2, Section 11B(3, Section 11B(1, Section 11B

CARDINAL: 1, 14-6-1994, 25, 4, 61, 321, 38, 27, one, 67, 3, 25, 347, 6, 39, 67, 483, two, two, two, 2, 5, three, two, 15-4-1993, 11, 12, 11, 12, 11, 3, 7, 7, 12, 3, 12B, 6.7, 15, 15, 15, 2, 17, one, 15-4-1993

ORG: the Collector (Appeals, PCJ-101/BRD/94, the Assistant Collector, SCN, the Assistant Collector, the Collector (Appeals, the Supreme Court, The Collector (Appeals, Bombay High Court's, the Collector (Appeals, SCN, Bombay High Court, the Bombay High Court, the Supreme Court, the Assistant Collector, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Union of India v. M/s. ITC Ltd., Court, Court, the Supreme Court, SCN, the Supreme Court, ITC Ltd., Sneh Builders, SCN, the Assistant Collector, the Supreme Court, Jain Spinners, FTC Ltd., Tribunal, PLA, PLA, Tri, S.D.R., SCN, the Rajasthan High Court, Rajasthan High Court, the Supreme Court, Jain Spinners, U.O.I., ITC Ltd., the Rajasthan High Court, the Supreme Court, Adarsh Metal Corporation, the Paper Book.6.3, the Apex Court, Department, Next, the Supreme Court, U.O.I., Jain Spinners, the High Court, Court, the High Court, W.P., the Collector (Appeals, the High Court, W.P., the High Court, Supreme Court, The Apex Court, the High Court, The Collector (Appeals', the Court/Tribunal, the High Court's, Jain Spinners, the Supreme Court.6.6 However, the Supreme Court, Union of India v. ITC Ltd., the Supreme Court, M/s. ITC Ltd., ITC, Collector (Appeals, M/s. ITC Ltd., the High Court, The High Court, Government, the High Court, Union of India, Special Leave Petition, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the High Court, ITC, Government, the Apex Court, ITC, ITC, the Apex Court, The Supreme Court, ITC, High Court, the Supreme Court, the High Court, Court, the High Court, Court, The High Court, Court, the Supreme Court, the Apex Court, ITC, Apex Court, the Appellate Tribunal, the High Court, the High Court, Court, Court, the High Court, the Collector of Central Excise, Court, the High Court, The Apex Court, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, High Court, the Supreme Court, the Assistant Collector, The Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Apex Court, ITC, the Apex Court, Department, the Apex Court, High Court, ITC, Bombay High Court, Special Leave Petition, the Supreme Court, ITC, the Consumer Welfare, the Apex Court, Oswal Agro Mills, SC, Oswal Agro Mills, FTC, the High Court, the High Court, Bank, Oswal Agro Mills, the Supreme Court, Union of India v. ITC Ltd

DATE: 20-11-1989, 18-12-1989, six months, 1992, 1988, six months, 1993, 1995, six months, 20-11-1989, 18-12-1989, 59, six months, six months, February 1973, 1982, 24970 of 1982, 8-10-1982, 8-10-1982, September 1970 - February 1973, 70, 48

PERSON: Roplas, Shri Willingdon Christian, Roplas Judgment, Roplas, Jain Spinner, Roplas, Benches, C. C. Ex, Metal Corpn, Jain Spinners, Collector, Meerut

GPE: A.C., S.C., p.a., I.T.C.

PRODUCT: Spinners

LOC: the East Regional Bench, Govt, Govt, Respondent, ITC case.9

ORDINAL: second, first, first, first, first, first, Firstly

QUANTITY: 20-9-1991, 20-9-1991

TIME: 20-9-1991

PERCENT: 12%