Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Jaharlal Pagalia Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Decided On : May-20-1958

Court : Kolkata

LAW: Section 80, Section 80, Order 2 Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 80, Section 77 of the Railways Act and Section 80, Section 18, Section 77 of the Railways Act and Section 80, Section 80, Section 80, Section 80, Article 10, Section 80, Section 80, Section 77, the Indian Railways Act, Section 77, Notice under Section 80, Section 80, Section 80, Article 10 of the Indian Independence (Rights, Properties and Liabilities, Section 80, Section 80, Section 80, Article 10 of the Indian Independence Order, Section 80, Section 80, Section 77, the Indian Railways Act, Section 77, Section 80, Section 77, the Railway Act, Section 77 of the Railways Act, Section 80, Section 80, Section 80, Section 80, Section 77 of the Railways Act, Section 80, Section 80, Section 80, Section 80, Section 80, Section 80, Section 80, Section 80, Section 80, Section 80, Section 80is, Section 80, Section 80, Section 80, Section 80, Section 80, Section 80, Section 80, Section 80, Section 80, Section 80, Section 80, Section 80, Section 80, Order 7, Rule 1, Section 80, Section 80, Section 80

PERSON: Ray, J.1, Partab Singh, Watson, Muhammad Hafiz, Muhmmad Zakariya, Buckmaster, Gill, Esher, M. R., Fry L., Madan Lal, Cal LJ, C. J., J., Rankin C. J., Raj Kumnr Shaw, Bachawat, Cal L. J. 98, Bachawat J., Nalini Ranjan Guha v. Union, Bose J., Harries C. J., Harries C. J., G.N. Das J. looked, C. J. expressly, Woodroffe J., Justice Mahajan, Justice Mahajan, Mahajan, Harries C. J., J., Lordships

DATE: two months, 1873, 1888-22, 1950, 1947, the notice two months, the expiry of two months, 1881, daily, one month

CARDINAL: 26, 3-5-1958, Two, 15, 49, 15, 23, 26, 12, 107, 128, one, 49, 357, 84, 179, 624, 557-558, 84, 175, 2, 86, 86, 86, 93, 59, 86, 84, 104, 84, 8, 1951]2SCR474, 50, 12

ORDINAL: First, second, first, first, secondly, first

ORG: Civil Procedure, the Judicial Committee, Lordships, the Board in Raja of, Venkata Mahipati Surya, Cooke, Court, Engineering Supplies Ltd., Dhandhania and Co., Court, Court, AIR 1949 Cal 495, Court, Court, Dominion of India, Pannalal, Cal LJ 175, AIR 1949 Cal 622, the Small Cause Courts Act, Dunlop Rubber Co. India Ltd., ILR, J., AIR 1949 Cal 622, ILR, Nilima Sarkar, Nilima Sarkar, Court, Nilima Sarkar, Court, Hindusthan Housing and Land Development Trust Ltd., Bench, Jagadkhprosad Pannalal, Cal LJ 175, AIR 1949 Cal 622, Court, Court, Lordships, Bench, Prosad Pannalal, Cal LJ 175, AIR 1949 Cal 622, Anath Bandhu Deb v. Dominion, J., Court, delivered.16, The Bombay High Court, Bata Shoe Co., Ltd. v. Union of India, Co. v. Union of India, the Calcutta High Court, the Bombay High Court, State, Seraikella v. Union of India, Poyser v. Minors, LJ Ex, Federal Court, Lordship, Codeas, Court, Certificate

LOC: Mt. Chand Koer

GPE: Rankin, India, Madanlal, Jalan, India, Bansi, Harries, Bansi, Harries, Jagadish, Bansi, Harries, India, Bholaram, Azizuddin, jurisdiction.22

FAC: the Governor-General, Lordship

QUANTITY: 1950-2 Cal 551

PRODUCT: Cal LJ 98, Cal LJ 98, Cal LJ 373, Cal LJ 98, Lordship

NORP: notice.15

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //