Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

General Insurance Co., Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Bengal.

Decided On : Feb-22-1949

Court : Kolkata

LAW: section 66(1, Rule 2 of Schedule II, Rule 2 of Schedule II, Tax Act, the Indian Contract Act, section 205 of Act VIII, Chapter III, section 32, the Indian Contract Act, The Insurance Act, the Insurance Act, the Succession Certificate Act, Profits Tax Act

NORP: Indian, Indian

ORG: the Excess Profits Tax Act, XV, Ruby General Insurance Co. Ltd., Profit, the Excess Profits Tax Act, the Excess Profits Tax Act ', the Excess Profits Tax Act, the Excess Profits Tax Act, the Excess Profits Tax Act, Chatterjee v. International Film Corporation, Ltd., Suffice, the Judicial Committee, Syud Tuffussool, Bench, Court, Shaldon Bridge Co., the House of Lords, Northern Aluminium Co., Ltd., M.R., Green, M.R., the House of Lords, DAS

CARDINAL: 1940).The, 2, 1, 1, 2, 1, 19,83,890, 2, one, 2, two, two, 941, 411, One, 1, 546, 2, 55, 1, II, 2

GPE: India, Mookerjee, Halsbury, L.C., Hopkins, E.R.

DATE: September 1, 1939, December, 1939, January 1, 1939, annual, September 1, December 31, 1939, any particular year, that year, 1859, a future day, a particular year, 1938, 1889, spring, 1946, 1946, the years, some subsequent year, that year, a previous year

ORDINAL: second, second

PERSON: Schedule II, Schedule, Henry Dresser, William Johns, Hossein Khan v., Rughoonath Pershad, Banchharman Majumdar, Adyanath Bhattacharjee, Jenkin C.J., J., Simpsion v. Teignmouth, Thomas, Schedule VII

MONEY: 40 per cent, 40 per cent

PRODUCT: Rule 2, Rule 2, F, F

LANGUAGE: English, English

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //