Semantic Analysis by spaCy
General Insurance Co., Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Bengal.
Decided On : Feb-22-1949
Court : Kolkata
LAW: section 66(1, Rule 2 of Schedule II, Rule 2 of Schedule II, Tax Act, the Indian Contract Act, section 205 of Act VIII, Chapter III, section 32, the Indian Contract Act, The Insurance Act, the Insurance Act, the Succession Certificate Act, Profits Tax Act
NORP: Indian, Indian
ORG: the Excess Profits Tax Act, XV, Ruby General Insurance Co. Ltd., Profit, the Excess Profits Tax Act, the Excess Profits Tax Act ', the Excess Profits Tax Act, the Excess Profits Tax Act, the Excess Profits Tax Act, Chatterjee v. International Film Corporation, Ltd., Suffice, the Judicial Committee, Syud Tuffussool, Bench, Court, Shaldon Bridge Co., the House of Lords, Northern Aluminium Co., Ltd., M.R., Green, M.R., the House of Lords, DAS
CARDINAL: 1940).The, 2, 1, 1, 2, 1, 19,83,890, 2, one, 2, two, two, 941, 411, One, 1, 546, 2, 55, 1, II, 2
GPE: India, Mookerjee, Halsbury, L.C., Hopkins, E.R.
DATE: September 1, 1939, December, 1939, January 1, 1939, annual, September 1, December 31, 1939, any particular year, that year, 1859, a future day, a particular year, 1938, 1889, spring, 1946, 1946, the years, some subsequent year, that year, a previous year
ORDINAL: second, second
PERSON: Schedule II, Schedule, Henry Dresser, William Johns, Hossein Khan v., Rughoonath Pershad, Banchharman Majumdar, Adyanath Bhattacharjee, Jenkin C.J., J., Simpsion v. Teignmouth, Thomas, Schedule VII
MONEY: 40 per cent, 40 per cent
PRODUCT: Rule 2, Rule 2, F, F
LANGUAGE: English, English