Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Godrej Soap Ltd. Vs. State

Decided On : Jul-28-1989

Court : Kolkata

LAW: Article 20(3, Constitution, Article 367, Constitution, the General Clauses Act, Constitution, Constitution, Article 31(1, Article 300A, Article 367(1, Constitution, Section 3, Article 20(3, Article 20(3, Section 342A, Constitution, the Oaths Act, Article 20(3, Article 20(3, the Evidence Act, Section 3 of the Evidence Act, Section 119 of the Evidence Act, Section 60, Section 3, Section 60 and Section 119 of the Evidence Act.6, Section 139, the Evidence Act, Section 119, Section 60, Article 20(3, Section 139 of the Evidence Act, Article 20(3, Article 20(3, Article 20, Article 20(3, Section 119, Article 20(3, Article 32 of the Constitution, Article 20(3, Article 20(3, Article 141, Article 20(3, Article 20(3, Article 20(3, Section 139 of the Evidence Act, Article 20(3, Constitution, Constitution, the American Constitution, Article 20(3, the American Constitution, the American Constitution, Constitutional, Article 20(3, the Indian Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, Article 20(3, Section 305 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 313

PERSON: Bhattacharjee, M.P. Sharma v., Satish Chandra, Bench, Kathi Kalu Oghad, him.8, M.P. Sharma, M.P. Sharma's, Leatham, Bench, Jasper White, P.B. Mukharji J., B.B. Sen, Mahatma Gandhi, Kumar Basu v., P.B. Mukherji

ORDINAL: first, secondly, fifth, fifth, fifth, fifth, fifth

CARDINAL: 2, eight, 304, eleven, 1961CriLJ856, 3, 1978(2)ELT287(SC, 1961, 31, 327, 1961CriLJ856, 31, 1961, 31, 324, 201, 322, 9f, 183, two, 314, 315, 1978(2)ELT287(SC, One

DATE: 1897, 1949, 1898, 1955, 1969, the age of twelve years, 1978(2)ELT287(SC, 1815, 1978(2)ELT287(SC, 1901, 1970)ILLJ662SC, 1978(2)ELT287(SC, 1978(2)ELT287(SC, 1961, 1978(2)ELT287(SC, US 43, 1951, 1897, 1970, the present day, a few decades ago, 1978(2)ELT287(SC, some quarters

ORG: Bench, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, State, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, AC 495, the Supreme Court, Sudhansu Sekhar Misra, Division Bench, the Bombay High Court, State, Maharashtra v. Nagpur Electric Light and Power Co. Ltd., the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Kathi Kalu Oghad, Nagpur Electric Light andPower Co. Ltd., inter alia, Supreme Court, Nagpur Electric Light and, Power Co., Hale v. Henkel, American Constitution, the Constitutent Assembly, the House of Lords, Salomon, Salomon and Co., AC 22, Property Development Trust Ltd., the Supreme Court, State of U. P. v. Renusagar Power Co., the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, VIII, the Supreme Court

GPE: Bombay, Quinn, M.P. Sharma, M.P. Sharma, Bombay, M.P. Sharma, Bombay, United States, Mahadeb Jiew, Chira, New Jurisprudence, M.P. Sharma, M.P. Sharma

NORP: Indian, American, American, American, American, American, American, American

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //