Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Vijaya Bank Vs. Art. Tend Exports and Peerless Plastics Industries

Decided On : Feb-28-1990

Court : Kolkata

Notice (8): Undefined index: topics [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 36]
Warning (2): Invalid argument supplied for foreach() [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 39]

LAW: Section 34, the Civil Procedure Code, Section 21A, the Banking Regulation Act, Section 34, the Civil Procedure Code, Section 34, Section 34, Section 34 of the Code, Section 3 of the 1855 Act, Section 34, the Civil Procedure Code, Cal 427, the Usury Laws Repeal Act, Section 2, Section 3, Order 20, Rule 11, Order 20, Rule 11, Order 20, Rule 11, the 1855 Act, Section 2, Section 2, Section 34, the Civil Procedure Code, Section 21A, the Banking Regulation Act, Order 20, Rule 11, the Civil Procedure Code, Section 34, Code of Civil Procedure :Interest.--(1, Rule 11, the Banking Regulation Act, Section 80, Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 1, the Interest Act, the Interest Act, the Interest Act, the Interest Act, Section 4(1, Section 3, Section 4(2, Section 5, Section 34, the Civil Procedure Code, the Interest Act, the Interest Act, the Interest Act, the Interest Act, Section 34, the Civil Procedure Code, Section 34, Section 34, Section 34, the Interest Act, the Interest Act, the Interest Act, the Interest Act, the Interest Act, Section 80, the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 61(2, Section 34, the Interest Act, The Interest Act, the Interest Act, the Interest Act, Section 3, the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 4(1, the Interest Act, Section 21A, the Banking Regulation Act, Section 34 of the Code itself.26, Section 34 of the Code, Section 34, the Civil Procedure Code, Order 34, Order 34, Section 34, Act 21 of 1929, Order 34, the Civil Procedure Code, Rule 11, the Code of Civil Procedure Amendment Act, Rule 11, the Amending Act 21 of 1929, Section 32, Section 34 of the Code, Order 34, Rule 11, Section 34 of the Code, Order 34, Section 32, Section 34 of the Code, Section 31(1, Section 34 of the Code, Section 209, the Civil Procedure Code of, Section 34, the Civil Procedure Code, Section 34, Section 34, Section 54, the Civil Procedure Code, Section 34, the Civil Procedure Code, Section 34 of the Code, Section 34, Section 34 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Rule 11, Order 34, Section 34, Order 34, Rule 11, Act 28 of 1855, Section 2.54, Section 34 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 2, Section 34 of the Code, Order 34, Section 34, Section 34, Section 21, the Banking Regulation Act, Section 34(2, Section 34(2, Section 34, the Civil Procedure Code, Section 34, Section 34, Section 34, the Finance Act, Section 34, the Civil Procedure Code, Section 34 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 34.74, Section 34, Section 34(1, Order 34, Order 20, Rule 11, Order 20, Rule 11, Order 20, Rule 11, Order 34, Order 34, Order 20, Order 34, Order 34, Order 34, Order 20, Rule 11, Order 34, Cal 524,to, Order 34, Order 34, Order 34, Order 20, Rule 11, Order 34, Order 20, Rule 11 of the Code, Order 20, Rule 11, Order 34, Order 34, Order 34, Order 20, Rule 11, Order 20, Rule 11, Rule 11, Order 20, Rule 11, Order 20, Rule 11

PERSON: Bimal Chandra Basak, Pratap Chatterjee, Chatterjee, Chatterjee, Marwari, Dhowtal Roy, Chatterjee, S. K. Engineering Works, K. Appa Rao v., Varadaraj AIR, Chandra Chakravarti, Bimal Chatterjee, Pratap Chatterjee, Sudhury Mahatabuddin, Jayanta Mitra, Rungta, Nathabhai Desaibhai Patel, Bertram Scott, AIR1987Cal64, Kumar Purnendu Nath, Hind Hosiery Mill, P.K. Mullick, Ruttanji Ramji, Mahabir Prasad Rungta v. Durga Datta, Ruttanji Raniji, Galimala, Jena, Reasons, Chandra Shaha, Safer Ali Mondal, Aziz Khan v. Duni-Chand, Ahad Shah, Kumar Adhya v., Chandra Barman, Sanat, Kumar Das, Jatindra Nath Chowdhury, Uday, Kumar Das, Lala Hakim Rai v. Lala, Mahabir Prasad Rungta v. Durga Datta, Rules 2, Singh Chowdhury v. Surajmal Jalal, Lachmi Narain Ram, Nathabhai Desaibhai Patel, Jo, Rajasthan v. Raghubir Singh AIR 1979, Natson Mfg, Irrigation Galimala, Jena, Mangniram Marwari, Dhowtal Roy, J. W. Crewddon v. Ganesh Das, Shivaprasad Singh v., Prayagkumari Debee, Bertram Scott, Banerjee, Bertram Scott, Banerjee, Hind Hosiery Mill, Kumar Purnendu Nath, Bertram Scott, Soli Pestonji, Ganga Dhar, Mahabir Prasad, Nathabhai Desaibhai, Mahabir Prasad, Soli Pestonji, Nathabhai Desaibhai Patel, Moolia, K. Appa Rao v., Varadaraj AIR, Pestonji Majoo, Natson Mfg, Bertram Scott, Kumar Purnendu, Bertram Scott, Rashyan Udyog, Nathabhai Desaibhai Patel, Mangniram Marwari, Dhowtal Roy, Shivaprasad Singh v., Prayagkumari Debee, K. Appa Rao v., Varadaraj AIR, Printers Mysore, Pothan Joseph, Bimal Singh Kothari v., Kanta Koyal, Chandra Mandal, K. Appa Rao v., Varadaraj AIR, H.C. Holder, Lala Hakim Rai v. Lala, Thawardas Pherumal v. Union, Mangniram Marwari, Dhowtal Roy, Shivaprasad Singh v., Prayagkumari Debee, Banerjee, Banerjee, Hind Hosiery Mill, Rashyan Udyog, Thakur Umed Singh v. Amolakchand, Wool Store's, Sudhury Mahatabuddin, Chandra Chakravarti v., Brojendm Mohan Maitro, Cal 427, Bose, Bose, Mookherjee, Bose, Hind Hosiery Mill P. Ltd., Sudhury Mahatabuddin, Bench, Bench, Chatterjee

CARDINAL: three, 6, 12, 65, 393, 73, 482, 3, 1, 253, 6, 1961]3SCR639, AIR1988Cal311, 5, one, 10, 5, 2, 2, 13, 14, 15, 1961]3SCR639, 993, 1988]1SCR253, One, 20, two, 48, 249, 22, 24, 25, at least one, 1955]2SCR48, 1961]3SCR639, 993, 1969]3SCR33, one, more than 6, 603, 604, 20, 1987]3SCR607, 1979]1SCR372, 518, 1988]1SCR253, 1979]1SCR372, 1987]3SCR607, 12, One, 67):'The, 1, 26,28,647.60, 1, 1, 32,14,000, 5,50,000, three, seven, 146, 5, AIR1988Cal311, 73, 482, two, two, 1969]3SCR33, 1961]3SCR639, 486, 73, 1961]3SCR639, 1969]3SCR33, 1, 490, 1, 95, 5,000, 65, 393, 1969]3SCR33, 49, 187, 62, AIR1988Cal311, 12, 62, 669, 65, 148, 29, 148, 1960]3SCR713, 65, 393, 144, 1931, 2, 94, 147, 70, 61, 12, 68, 73, 482, 65, 393, 84, one, 76, 6, 6, 6, 6, two, 533, two, 1, 2, three, 15, two, 15, 1

ORDINAL: first, first, first, first, first, first, first, third, first, first, second, second, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, second

DATE: 1855, 1949, 1886, 1989, Mad 94, 1989, 1992, 1949, 1881, 1911, 1984, 64, 71, 94, 1949, 1989, 1988, 1970, 1970, 1949, 1918, 10 of 1918, '17, '18, '19, 1839, 1978, 1522-23, 1908, 1839, 1978, 1839, 1978, 1978, 1978, 1839, 1978, 1839, 1918, 1918, 1917, 1839, 1978, 1978, 1839, 1978, 1949, 1922 PC, 46, 1942 PC 61, '32, monthly, 4, 1956, 1918, 1545, '35, 1951, '37, 1989]3SCR696, 1886, 1882, 42, '45, 1983, seven years, 48, 1988, quarterly, '49, 1989, 1992, '51, 1990, 1990, 1881, '55, Mad 94, quarterly, 1989, annual, six-monthly, quarterly, quarterly, 1881, 1979, 1987, 1989]3SCR696, 1989, 1886, Mad 94, 1986, 1989, 1949, 1990, '64, Mad 94, 1989, quarterly, 1990, the quarter, Quarterly, a particular quarter, the end of each half year, 1925, half-year, the next half year, '69, quarterly, 1942, 1955, 1886, '71, 1988, 1989, 1992, 1989, 1982, 1911, about seven years, 1949, '82, 1988, 1911, 1911, 1911, 1911, Rule 2(1)(c, 1911, three years, monthly

ORG: ILR, State Bank of India, Pvt. Ltd., Batata v. New Bank of India, Central Bank of India, P.R. Garments Industries P. Ltd., Chemicals v. Bank of Baroda, United Bank of India, New Glencoe TeaCo., AIR1987Cal143 , United Bank of India v. Rashyan Udyog, Brojendra Mohan Maitra, Naidu, ILR, the Dena Bank, Mulla's Civil Procedure Code, United Bank of India, New Glencoe Tea Co. Ltd., Calcutta, Dena Bank v. Victory Engineering Works, State of Madhya Pradesh, Financial Corporation, I.) Ltd., State Bank of India, United Bank of India v. Rashyan Udyog, United Bank of India, the Banking Companies (Acquisition, Court, the Usurious Loans Act, State, Bengal Nagpur Railway Co. Ltd., the Judicial Committee, the Supreme Court, the Courts of Equity, Nagpur Railway Co. Ltd., Courts of Equity, Durga Datta, Executive Engineer, Irrigation, The Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, the Statement of Objects, the Supreme Court, Tribunal, the Sale of Goods Act, Privy Council, the Calcutta High Court, State Bank of India, the Sale of Goods Act, the Privy Council, the Supreme Court, Lordships, Lordships, Lordships, Lordships, Lordships, the Privy Council, Thawardas Pherumal v. Union of India, the Supreme Court, Ganga Dhar Khemka, The High Court, the High Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Federal Court, the Usurious Loans Act, the Federal Court, State of Madhya Pradesh, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, State, SC, The High Court, the High Court, The Supreme Court, the High Court, Everest Industrial Corporation P. Ltd., Gujarat State Financial Corporation, the State Financial Corporations Act, The Supreme Court, Gujarat State Financial Corporation, P.) Ltd., The High Court, the High Court, Executive Engineer, the Supreme Court, Jaiswal Industries, the Supreme Court, Gujarat State Financial Corporation, Everest Industrial Corporation P. Ltd., Gujarat State Financial Corporation, Calcutta, this High Court, ILR, State, West Bengal, Financial Corporation, I.) Ltd., the State Bank of India, the Division Bench, Financial Corporation, I.) Ltd., United Bank of India, New Glencoe Tea Co. Ltd., United Bank of India, AIR 1987 Cal, United Bank of India, State Bank of India, Life Insurance Corporation of, West Bengal, Financial Corporation, I.) Ltd., State Bank of India, United Bank of India v. Rashyan Udyog, Division Bench, Division Bench, the Supreme Court, State of Madhya Pradesh, the Supreme Court, Division Bench, the Supreme Court, United Bank of India v. Eshani Rubber Industries, Naidu, ILR, Amolakchand, the Rajasthan High Court, the High Court, Central Bank of India, P. R. Garments Industries Pvt. Ltd., the Gujarat High Court, the Central Bank of India, Jagannath Pigments, Chemicals v. Bank of Baroda, Naidu, ILR, Ganga Dhar Khemka, Gujarat State Financial Corporation, P.) Ltd., SC, Everest Industrial Corporation, Gujarat State Financial Corporation, SC, Maganlal, Jaiswal Industries, the Privy Council, the Supreme Court, West Bengal, Financial Corporation, I.) Ltd., the Privy Council, the Supreme Court, Life Insurance Corporation, Division Bench, Financial Corporation, I.) Ltd., United Bank of India, State of Madhya Pradesh, ILR, United Bank of India, P. R. Garments Industries Pvt, Jagannath Pigments, Chemicals v. Bank of Baroda, the Reserve Bank of India, inter alia, Bank of Rajasthan Ltd., S.K. Trading Co., the Reserve Bank of India, Muir Mills Co. Ltd., AIR1952Cal645, State Bonk of, Supreme Court, S. K. Engineering Works, Batala v. New Bank of India, Central Bank of India, Jagannath Pigments, Chemicals v. Bank of Baroda, Division Bench, Bank of Rajasthan v. S. K. Trading Co., IRC, the Court of Appeal, the Court of Appeal, the Privy Council, the Supreme Court, SC, the Calcutta High Court, ILR, State Bank of India, United Bank of India, New Glencoe Tea Co. Ltd., AIR1987Cal143 , United Bank of India, United Sank, High Courts, Jagannath Pigments, Chemicals v. Bank of Baroda, Central Bank of India, P.R. Garments Industries Pvt. Ltd., S. K. Engineering Works, New Bank of India, the Gujarat High Court, P. R. Garments Industries Pvt, the Supreme Court, Calcutta, Bidhu Sekhar Bandhopadhya, the High Court, evidence.79, United Bank of India, New Glencoe Tea Co. Ltd., the Bills of Sale Act, the Division Bench, Cooperative Hindusthan Bank Ltd., Surendra Nath Dey AIR 1952, High Courts, New Citizen Bank of India Ltd., K.B. Burnel and Co., Official Assignee of, the Bombay High Court, Bench, United Bank of India, United Bank of India, New Glencoe Tea Co. Ltd., inter alia, United Bank of India, New Glencoe Tea Co. Ltd., Bidhu Sekhar Bandhopadhya, New Glencoe Tea Co, Ltd., Bidhu Sekhar Bandhopadhya, inter alia, Bidhu Sekhar Bandhopadhya, New Glencoe Tea Co., inter alia

GPE: AIR1987Cal64, Bombay, India, Bejoy, Krishna, AIR1987Cal64, Pannalal, Jagannath, Jaigobind, Singh, valorem, Maganlal, AIR1987Cal64, AIR1987Cal64, AIR1987Cal64, Singh v., Gheesalal, the United Kingdom, India, V.L., Jogesh, AIR1987Cal64, AIR1987Cal64, India, Jagadish, Bombay

PRODUCT: 1 Cal LT 367, 1 Cal LT 367, 1 Cal LJ 69.9, 952, 1 Cal LJ 69, 1 Cal LT 367, the Full Bench, 1 Cal LT 367.61, 1 Cal LT 139, 1 Cal LT 139, 1 Cal LJ 69, 1 Cal LT 367, LR 472, 1 Cal LJ 69

WORK_OF_ART: Bidhu Sekhar Bandhopadhya, 2 Cal HCN 271, Satish Chandra, Soli Pestonji Majoo, Subordinate, 3 Mad 125, 3 Mad 125

MONEY: six per cent, six per cent, 6 per cent, 6 per cent, 8 per cent, 12 per cent, 6 per cent, 6 per cent, 3 per cent, 3 per cent, 18 per cent, 7 1/2 per cent, 18 per cent, 7 1/2 per cent, 6 per cent, 16 per cent, 16.5 per cent, 6 per cent, 16.5 per cent, 13.5 per cent, 13.5 per cent, 6 per cent, 6 per cent, 12.5 per cent, six per cent, 6 per cent, 6 per cent, 6 per cent, 6 per cent

PERCENT: 4%, 6%, 1/2%, 13%, 6%, 13%, 6%

EVENT: the 1978 Act, the 1978 Act

FAC: Nihai Chand, Subordinate

NORP: court.30, Thakur Umed, Indian

LANGUAGE: English

View Full Judgment


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //