Commissioner of Income-tax (Central) Vs. Standard Vacuum Oil Co. Ltd.

Decided On : Nov-24-1964

Court : Kolkata

LAW: Section 10, Section 10, Wealth Tax Act, Section 8, Section 2(m, Section 2(q, Section 7(2)(a, Section 10, Section 10, Section 10, the Wealth Tax Act, Section 10, Section 10, Section 10, Section 10, Section 10, Section 10, Section 10, Section 10, Section 43, Section 42, Section 42, Section 42, Section 42, Section 42, Section 42, Rule 3, The Licensing Act, the Licensing Act, Section 9, the Income Tax Act, Section 84, Indian Income Tax Act, Section 10, the Income Tax Act, Section 5, Section 10, the Income Tax Act, Section 5, Section 12, Section 10 of the Business Profits Tax Act, the Indian Income Tax Act, Section 10

CARDINAL: 1, 2, 1922.2, 3, 1, 2, 2, 1, 95, one, 2, 21, two, one, 1958]34ITR10(SC, 1958]34ITR10(SC, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 1, 701, 1961]41ITR545(SC, 1, 2, 2, 1, 2, 2, 5, 216, 1, 3, 9, 2, 2, 2, 11, 16, 120, 1, 2, 387, 2, 1963]50ITR809(Mad, 1961]41ITR545(SC, 15, 1961]41ITR545(SC, 1964]53ITR186(SC, 2, 1964]51ITR47(Ker, 1963]50ITR809(Mad, 2

NORP: Indian, English

ORG: Appellate, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Court, the Income-Tax Act, the Income-Tax Act, Tribunal, the Income-Tax Act.5, the Supreme Court, Reliance, the Supreme Court, Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, SC, the Income-Tax Act, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Co. Ltd., AC 448, inn, the House of Lords, Smith v. Lion Brewery Co. Ltd., Court, Court, Crown, Crown, The House of Lords, AC 150, the Court of Appeal prevailed.10, Lyle Ltd., Company, the House of Lords, Warnes and Co. Ltd., Rhymney Iron Co. Ltd., Fowler, Company, Company, the Land Tax Assessment Act, the High Court of, Lion Brewery Co. Ltd., the Federal Parliament, Commonwealth, the Supreme Court, Income Tax, Malayulam Plantation Ltd., Court, the Controller of Estate Duty, Company, Controller, the Supreme Court ', Company, Court, Court, Court, AC 448, the Supreme Court, Court, Include, Company, Kumbakonam Electric Supply Corporation Ltd., Company, the Supreme Court, Malayalam Plantation Ltd., Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Court, Malayalam Plantation, the Supreme Court, Court, Malayalam Plantation, Legislature, Legislature, the Appellate Tribunal

DATE: the end of the year, 1957, 1957, every financial year, the 1st day of April 1957, every financial year, the last day of previous year, that year, any year, that year, 1922, 1961, 1906, 1909, 1904, 1911, 1955, 1912, 1896, 1895, the year, 1910, 44,924, the financial year ending on June 30, 1911, 1902, the year, 1964]53ITR140(SC, 1964]53ITR140(SC, three months, 1906, '13, '14, 1964]53ITR140(SC, 1964]53ITR140(SC, 1955, 1964]53ITR140(SC

GPE: Clauses, Bombay, India, India, Strong, Woodifield, Victoria, Victoria, Victoria, Australia, lawin, Victoria, India, the United Kingdom, India, India, India, India, Strong, Abdullabhai

ORDINAL: first, first, first, third

PERSON: Badridas Daga v. Commissioner, xv, Abdullabhai Abdulkadar, Reiving, Loreburn L. C., inn-keepers, Parwell L. J., Farwell L. J., Kennedy L. J., Morgan, Tate, Reid, Morton, Meffatt v. Webb, shall, J., Lordships, Abdul Kadar's, Reid, Madras, G. J. Goelho, xv

TIME: overnight

LOC: Port Sudan, Madras

FAC: Channell

PRODUCT: Lordship

EVENT: AC 21, AC 21

QUANTITY: 18,000 acres