Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Anil Kumar Mahensaria Vs. Commissioner of Customs (Port)

Decided On : May-07-2003

Court : Kolkata

LAW: Section 3 of Sub-section 1 of Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, the Customs Act, the Customs Act, the Customs Act

PERSON: Bhaskar Bhattacharya, Calcutta Branch, Ball, Vidur Impex, Nos, Chatterjee, Bandyopadhyay, Chatterjee, Bandyopadhyay, Bandopadhyay, Bandyopadhyay, Bandyopadhyay, Chatterjee

NORP: J.1, Joint

CARDINAL: 3, 4, 9, 4, 8, 1, 2, 3, two, one, 4, 6, 145, 148, 3, 10, 3, nine, three, nine, nine, 152, 154, 155, 3, 4, 3, 3, 4, 3, 3, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 4, 300

ORG: C.A - 000000066224, the United Bank of India, Customs Department, Custom Account, Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, the Government of India, M/s. Arjun Exports, M/s. Arjun Exports, Shyam Sunder Enterprises, Court, W.P. No, Customs Special Investigation Branch, Calcutta, United Bank of India, Counsel, Customs, Court, Court, GM, Customs Authority

PRODUCT: P-3, Vizag

DATE: July 10, 2002, March 31, 2002, 7th February, 2003, 1974, 1974, May 6, 2002, 2002, 2002, January 18, 2002, January 18, 2000, 18th January, 2002

PERCENT: 100%, 100%, 20%

GPE: Singapore, Singapore

ORDINAL: third

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //