Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

United Commercial Bank Ltd. Vs. the Commr. of Income-tax, West Bengal

Decided On : May-18-1953

Court : Kolkata

LAW: Section 8, Section 10, Section 12, Section 24(1, Section 8, Section 10, Section 8, Section 10.4, Section 24(2, Section 8, Section 8, Section 8, Section 8, Section 8, Section 8, Section 8, Section 8, Section 8, Section 8, Section 8, Section 10, Section 8, Section 10.11, Section 8, Section 10, Section 6, Section 8, Section 10, Section 6, Section 12.The, Section 6, Section 8, Section 6, Section 6.14, Section 9, Section 10, Section 9, Section 8, Section 9, Section 10, Section 10, Section 8, Section 8, Rule 25, Section 59, Section 34, Section 8, Section 12, Rule 25, Rule 25, Rule 25, Rule 25, Rule 25, Rule 25, Rule 25, Rule 25, Section 3, Section 8, Rule 25, Section 8, Section 6, the Indian Act, the English Act, Section 8, Section 10.23, Section 6, the Indian Act, Section 24, Section 24, Section 6, Section 24, Section 24, Section 24

ORG: Chakravartti, Court, the United Commercial Bank Limited, ago.3, the First Proviso to Section 8, State, State, Broach Co-operative, Bank Ltd., Madras Provincial Co-operative, Bank Ltd.', Privy Council, Bank Limited v., Tribunal, --'Commercial Properties Limited, AIR1928Cal456, Court, Court, Sections 6, Department, Fry v. Salisbury House Estate Ltd.', AC 432, Thompson v. Trust and Loan Company of Canada', Court, --'General Family Pension Fund, Department, the Indian Life Assurance Companies Act, Court, Department, Court, Schedules, Crown, Crown, Crown, AC 432', Schedules, Globe Insurance Co., AC 610, Court, the General Family Pension Fund, Globe Insurance Company's, Crown, III, AC 432', Schedules A, Schedules, Lordship, Government Securities, III, Government Securities, Court, AC 610', Schedules, Rowlatt, --'Butler v. Mortgage Company, Consols, General Life Assurance Society, Government, Lordship, the Supreme Court, Anglo-French Textile Co., Ltd., AIR 1953 SC 111 (L, Lordships, the Supreme Court, Bar

CARDINAL: Three, three, 23,62,815/-, two, three, one, six, one, one, three, 1951]20ITR579(Mad, 1, one, option.20, one, two, 1, 3, two, two, 31, 190, 13, 2, 437, 2, 1, 2, two, 2, 2, 1, 2, 3, two

PRODUCT: the Calcutta Bench, Schedule, Schedule, Schedules

DATE: the assessment year 1945-46, the previous year, the year, the preceding year against this year's, the accounting year, 8, 9, 1930, 1932, annual, 1912, 1930, 1932, 1913, 1930, annual, '21, 1913, 1883-90, the preceding year, the present year's, the year, the previous year, the year, the present accounting year, the relevant year

ORDINAL: first, second, third, second, third, second, third, second, third, second, first, Secondly, second, third, first, third, second, first, third, second, first, first, third, first, second, fourth, fifth, first, first, second, second, third, third

PERSON: Chaudhuri, Madras, Chaudhuri, Chaudhuri, Lahore, Chaudhuri, Chaudhuri, Bengal, Meyer, H. C. Kothari v. Commissioner, Madras, Chaudhuri, Lordships, Chaudhuri, Chaudhuri, Schedule, Schedule, Schedule D, Schedule D. What, Schedule, Lord Atkin, Believing, Schedule, Schedule D, Schedule C, Schedule, Schedule C, Schedule, Lord Atkin, section.22, Inother, Justice Rowlatt, Rowlatt, Schedule, Schedule C, Chaudhuri, Justice Rowlatt, Chaudhuri, Madras, Chaudhuri, Chaudhuri, Chaudhuri, Lahiri, J.29

GPE: Bombay, rejected.10, England, India, Bengal, London, Liverpool, London, IV, England, India, Halsbury, West Bengal

WORK_OF_ART: 1943 Mad 152, Second Edition, Volume 17, General Family Pensions Fund'

TIME: 10 of the Act

NORP: Rules, English, D.

LANGUAGE: English

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //