Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Umed Ali Bhuyan Vs. Raj Laksmi Debya

Decided On : Mar-13-1905

Court : Kolkata

LAW: Section 7, Section 10, Section 12, Section 15 of the Act, Section 15, Section 17, Section 10, Section 31, Section 31, Section '61, Section 20 of the Act, Section 244, Section 244, Act VII, Section 10, Section 19, Section 5, Section 10, Section 12, chapter XIX, Section 310A, Section 244, the Civil Procedure Code, Section 10, Section 244, Section 244

PERSON: Brett, Woodroffe, Taruck Hazra v., Dilwar Ali, Janki Das, Ram Golam Sahu, Ramrup Sahay, Khushal Misser

CARDINAL: 1, 207, 180, 83-12, 180, 83-12, two, 29, 6, 6, 630, 1, 7, 9, six, 2

DATE: 1895, 26th March 1898, the years 1303, 1304, 23rd May 1898, July 1898, arrear, the 9th January 1900.2, the 30th July 1900, arrear, annual, previous years, six months, 1901, 94, 1901, 1903, 1880, 1895, 1897, one month, '10

GPE: B.S., I.L.R.

ORDINAL: second, firstly, secondly, first, firstly, Secondly, first, second

ORG: Reliance, Special Appeal 730 of 1903, the Court of first instance, Appellate Court, Court, Court, Court, Culc, Court, the Public Demands Recovery Act, Court

PRODUCT: 331

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //