The Corporation of Calcutta Vs. Bheecunram Napit Alias Bheecun Napit Semantic Analysis

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

The Corporation of Calcutta Vs. Bheecunram Napit Alias Bheecun Napit

Decided On : Apr-23-1877

Court : Kolkata

Notice (8): Undefined index: topics [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 36]Code Context

$shops2 = $shops['topics'];
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/meta.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'The Corporation of Calcutta Vs. Bheecunram Napit Alias Bheecun Napit Semantic Analysis',
	'shops' => array(
		'LAW' => array(
			(int) 0 => 'Section 147',
			(int) 1 => 'Section 147',
			(int) 2 => 'the Criminal Procedure Code',
			(int) 3 => 'Section 181',
			(int) 4 => 'Section 147',
			(int) 5 => 'Section 147.2'
		),
		'ORG' => array(
			(int) 0 => 'Macpherson',
			(int) 1 => 'Magistrate',
			(int) 2 => 'Government'
		),
		'PERSON' => array(
			(int) 0 => 'J.1'
		),
		'CARDINAL' => array(
			(int) 0 => 'One'
		)
	),
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '852065',
			'acts' => '',
			'appealno' => '',
			'appellant' => 'The Corporation of Calcutta',
			'authreffered' => '',
			'casename' => 'The Corporation of Calcutta Vs. Bheecunram Napit Alias Bheecun Napit',
			'casenote' => 'High Courts' Criminal Procedure Act (X of 1875), Section 147 - Acquittal--Presidency Magistrates' Act (IV of 1877), Section 181--The Calcutta Municipal Act (Beng. Act IV of 1876), Section 75--79. - ',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => '',
			'citingcases' => '',
			'counselplain' => '',
			'counseldef' => '',
			'court' => 'Kolkata',
			'court_type' => 'PC',
			'decidedon' => '1877-04-23',
			'deposition' => '',
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => 'Macpherson, J.',
			'judgement' => '<p style="text-align: justify;">Macpherson, J.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">1. I am of opinion that Section 147 gives mo no power to grant this application. The object in fact is to appeal against an acquittal. But Section 147 does not provide for such an appeal. It contemplates the transfer of a case before disposal, or interference on behalf of persons aggrieved or injured by an order of the Magistrate. But there was no intention to give power to interfere in order to set aside an acquittal. It' it had been intended to give that remedy, it would, no doubt, have boon expressly given, as in the Criminal Procedure Code and in the Presidency Magistrates' Act, IV of 1877. One section of the lattor Act (Section 181) really shows that Section 147 was intended to apply only whore there has boon a conviction, for it makes notice to the Government prosecutor necessary before an application can be made under Section 147.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">2. Even, however, if I had the power to interfere, I would not exercise it in such a case as this.<p style="text-align: justify;"></p><p style="text-align: justify;">',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => '',
			'pubs' => '(1877)ILR2Cal291',
			'ratiodecidendi' => '',
			'respondent' => 'Bheecunram Napit Alias Bheecun Napit',
			'sub' => 'Criminal',
			'link' => null,
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '852065'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'The Corporation of Calcutta Vs. Bheecunram Napit Alias Bheecun Napit Semantic Analysis'
$shops = array(
	'LAW' => array(
		(int) 0 => 'Section 147',
		(int) 1 => 'Section 147',
		(int) 2 => 'the Criminal Procedure Code',
		(int) 3 => 'Section 181',
		(int) 4 => 'Section 147',
		(int) 5 => 'Section 147.2'
	),
	'ORG' => array(
		(int) 0 => 'Macpherson',
		(int) 1 => 'Magistrate',
		(int) 2 => 'Government'
	),
	'PERSON' => array(
		(int) 0 => 'J.1'
	),
	'CARDINAL' => array(
		(int) 0 => 'One'
	)
)
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '852065',
		'acts' => '',
		'appealno' => '',
		'appellant' => 'The Corporation of Calcutta',
		'authreffered' => '',
		'casename' => 'The Corporation of Calcutta Vs. Bheecunram Napit Alias Bheecun Napit',
		'casenote' => 'High Courts' Criminal Procedure Act (X of 1875), Section 147 - Acquittal--Presidency Magistrates' Act (IV of 1877), Section 181--The Calcutta Municipal Act (Beng. Act IV of 1876), Section 75--79. - ',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => '',
		'citingcases' => '',
		'counselplain' => '',
		'counseldef' => '',
		'court' => 'Kolkata',
		'court_type' => 'PC',
		'decidedon' => '1877-04-23',
		'deposition' => '',
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => 'Macpherson, J.',
		'judgement' => '<p style="text-align: justify;">Macpherson, J.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">1. I am of opinion that Section 147 gives mo no power to grant this application. The object in fact is to appeal against an acquittal. But Section 147 does not provide for such an appeal. It contemplates the transfer of a case before disposal, or interference on behalf of persons aggrieved or injured by an order of the Magistrate. But there was no intention to give power to interfere in order to set aside an acquittal. It' it had been intended to give that remedy, it would, no doubt, have boon expressly given, as in the Criminal Procedure Code and in the Presidency Magistrates' Act, IV of 1877. One section of the lattor Act (Section 181) really shows that Section 147 was intended to apply only whore there has boon a conviction, for it makes notice to the Government prosecutor necessary before an application can be made under Section 147.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">2. Even, however, if I had the power to interfere, I would not exercise it in such a case as this.<p style="text-align: justify;"></p><p style="text-align: justify;">',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => '',
		'pubs' => '(1877)ILR2Cal291',
		'ratiodecidendi' => '',
		'respondent' => 'Bheecunram Napit Alias Bheecun Napit',
		'sub' => 'Criminal',
		'link' => null,
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '852065'
)
$pattern = '/\(((0[1-9]|[12][0-9]|3[01])[.](0[1-9]|1[012])[.](17|18|19|20)[0-9]{2}).*\)/'
include - APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 36
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

Warning (2): Invalid argument supplied for foreach() [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 39]Code Context//$shops = $shops['entities'];

foreach ($shops2 as $key => $val) {
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/meta.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'The Corporation of Calcutta Vs. Bheecunram Napit Alias Bheecun Napit Semantic Analysis',
	'shops' => array(
		'LAW' => array(
			(int) 0 => 'Section 147',
			(int) 1 => 'Section 147',
			(int) 2 => 'the Criminal Procedure Code',
			(int) 3 => 'Section 181',
			(int) 4 => 'Section 147',
			(int) 5 => 'Section 147.2'
		),
		'ORG' => array(
			(int) 0 => 'Macpherson',
			(int) 1 => 'Magistrate',
			(int) 2 => 'Government'
		),
		'PERSON' => array(
			(int) 0 => 'J.1'
		),
		'CARDINAL' => array(
			(int) 0 => 'One'
		)
	),
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '852065',
			'acts' => '',
			'appealno' => '',
			'appellant' => 'The Corporation of Calcutta',
			'authreffered' => '',
			'casename' => 'The Corporation of Calcutta Vs. Bheecunram Napit Alias Bheecun Napit',
			'casenote' => 'High Courts' Criminal Procedure Act (X of 1875), Section 147 - Acquittal--Presidency Magistrates' Act (IV of 1877), Section 181--The Calcutta Municipal Act (Beng. Act IV of 1876), Section 75--79. - ',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => '',
			'citingcases' => '',
			'counselplain' => '',
			'counseldef' => '',
			'court' => 'Kolkata',
			'court_type' => 'PC',
			'decidedon' => '1877-04-23',
			'deposition' => '',
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => 'Macpherson, J.',
			'judgement' => '<p style="text-align: justify;">Macpherson, J.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">1. I am of opinion that Section 147 gives mo no power to grant this application. The object in fact is to appeal against an acquittal. But Section 147 does not provide for such an appeal. It contemplates the transfer of a case before disposal, or interference on behalf of persons aggrieved or injured by an order of the Magistrate. But there was no intention to give power to interfere in order to set aside an acquittal. It' it had been intended to give that remedy, it would, no doubt, have boon expressly given, as in the Criminal Procedure Code and in the Presidency Magistrates' Act, IV of 1877. One section of the lattor Act (Section 181) really shows that Section 147 was intended to apply only whore there has boon a conviction, for it makes notice to the Government prosecutor necessary before an application can be made under Section 147.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">2. Even, however, if I had the power to interfere, I would not exercise it in such a case as this.<p style="text-align: justify;"></p><p style="text-align: justify;">',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => '',
			'pubs' => '(1877)ILR2Cal291',
			'ratiodecidendi' => '',
			'respondent' => 'Bheecunram Napit Alias Bheecun Napit',
			'sub' => 'Criminal',
			'link' => null,
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '852065'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'The Corporation of Calcutta Vs. Bheecunram Napit Alias Bheecun Napit Semantic Analysis'
$shops = array(
	'LAW' => array(
		(int) 0 => 'Section 147',
		(int) 1 => 'Section 147',
		(int) 2 => 'the Criminal Procedure Code',
		(int) 3 => 'Section 181',
		(int) 4 => 'Section 147',
		(int) 5 => 'Section 147.2'
	),
	'ORG' => array(
		(int) 0 => 'Macpherson',
		(int) 1 => 'Magistrate',
		(int) 2 => 'Government'
	),
	'PERSON' => array(
		(int) 0 => 'J.1'
	),
	'CARDINAL' => array(
		(int) 0 => 'One'
	)
)
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '852065',
		'acts' => '',
		'appealno' => '',
		'appellant' => 'The Corporation of Calcutta',
		'authreffered' => '',
		'casename' => 'The Corporation of Calcutta Vs. Bheecunram Napit Alias Bheecun Napit',
		'casenote' => 'High Courts' Criminal Procedure Act (X of 1875), Section 147 - Acquittal--Presidency Magistrates' Act (IV of 1877), Section 181--The Calcutta Municipal Act (Beng. Act IV of 1876), Section 75--79. - ',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => '',
		'citingcases' => '',
		'counselplain' => '',
		'counseldef' => '',
		'court' => 'Kolkata',
		'court_type' => 'PC',
		'decidedon' => '1877-04-23',
		'deposition' => '',
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => 'Macpherson, J.',
		'judgement' => '<p style="text-align: justify;">Macpherson, J.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">1. I am of opinion that Section 147 gives mo no power to grant this application. The object in fact is to appeal against an acquittal. But Section 147 does not provide for such an appeal. It contemplates the transfer of a case before disposal, or interference on behalf of persons aggrieved or injured by an order of the Magistrate. But there was no intention to give power to interfere in order to set aside an acquittal. It' it had been intended to give that remedy, it would, no doubt, have boon expressly given, as in the Criminal Procedure Code and in the Presidency Magistrates' Act, IV of 1877. One section of the lattor Act (Section 181) really shows that Section 147 was intended to apply only whore there has boon a conviction, for it makes notice to the Government prosecutor necessary before an application can be made under Section 147.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">2. Even, however, if I had the power to interfere, I would not exercise it in such a case as this.<p style="text-align: justify;"></p><p style="text-align: justify;">',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => '',
		'pubs' => '(1877)ILR2Cal291',
		'ratiodecidendi' => '',
		'respondent' => 'Bheecunram Napit Alias Bheecun Napit',
		'sub' => 'Criminal',
		'link' => null,
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '852065'
)
$pattern = '/\(((0[1-9]|[12][0-9]|3[01])[.](0[1-9]|1[012])[.](17|18|19|20)[0-9]{2}).*\)/'
$shops2 = null
include - APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 39
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

LAW: Section 147, Section 147, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 181, Section 147, Section 147.2

ORG: Macpherson, Magistrate, Government

PERSON: J.1

CARDINAL: One