Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Dr. Devender Bohra Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Decided On : Apr-27-2010

Court : Punjab and Haryana

LAW: Section 21, the PNDT Act, Section 17(2, Section 3-A, Section 3-B, Section 4(2, the PNDT Act, Section 4, Section 5, Section 6, Section 2(g, Section 2(p, Rule 3, the Indian Medicine Central Act, Rule 3

NORP: K., Sonologist, Rules, Sonologist, Indian, Rules, Rules, Indian

GPE: Kannan, J.I.

DATE: 27.11.2008, 13.03.2009, 2009, 2009, the year 1996, diploma or six months, one year, less than two years, 1956, 1956, 1970, 1956, the year 2004

ORG: Natal Diagnostic Techniques, Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection, BAMS, registration2, the Indian Medical Council Act, the Central Council of Indian Medicines, BAMS, MMBS, Bachelor of Medicine, the Central Supervisory Board, appointed4, Imaging, Radiologist, Post, the Indian Medical Council Act, the Indian Medical Council Act, V. Government, BAMS, the Indian Medical Council Act, the Indian Medicine Central Council Act, Indian Medicine Central Council Act, Indian Medicine, the Indian Medical Council Act, State Medical, Counsel, the Indian Medical Council Act, BAMS, Government, State, BAMS

PRODUCT: the 'PNDT Act'

CARDINAL: 3, 3, 3, at least 20, 102, 102, two, three, 12.04.2004, 10,000/-

PERSON: Gynaecologist, rules5, Haryana

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //