Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Wollensak Vs. Reiher

Decided On : May-04-1885

Court : US Supreme Court

PERSON: Wollensak, Wollensak, Reiher, Wollensak, JUSTICE MATTHEWS, reason thereof, Miller, Mahn v. Harwood, Beaubien v. Beaubien, Marsh, Godden, Kimmell, Badger v. Badger, Carpenter, Landsdale v. Smith

GPE: U.S., U.S., U.S., the United States, the United States, MR

DATE: 1885, 1885, April 14-15, 1885, May 4, 1885, two years, two or more years, December 26, 1882, March 10, 1874, the 26th day of December, 1882, seventeen years, 10th day of March, 1874, two years, more than five years, two years, two or more years, 87

ORG: U.S. Supreme Court, the Patent Office, Court, Court, Page 115 U. S. 97 No, the Patent Office, Miller v. Brass Company, the Patent Office Board of Appeal, the Supreme Court, Brass Company, Court, the Patent Office, the Patent Office, the Patent Office, the Patent Office, Wood

CARDINAL: 115, 115, 10,264, 148,538, two, two, seven, nine, 10,264, 10,264, 148,538, 23, 190, 819, 19, 69, 21, 178, 99, 2

ORDINAL: first, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, ninth, first, first, first

PRODUCT: Moore v. Greene

PERCENT: 101 U. S.

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //