Swarn Ram and ors. Vs. Jaimal Ram

Decided On : Mar-04-2010

Court : Punjab and Haryana

LAW: Order 8 Rules 1, Order 8 Rule 1, Order 8 Rule 1 CPC, Order 8 Rule 1, the Amendment Act, Order 8 Rule 1, Order 8 Rule 1 CPCWritten, Order 8 Rule 5 CPCSpecific, the Amendment of Code of Civil Procedure, Order 8 Rule 1, Order 8 Rule 1 CPC, Order 8 Rule 1 CPC, Order 8 Rule 1, Order 8 Rule 1, Order 8 Rule 10, Order 8 Rule 1, Order 8 Rule 1 CPC, Order 8 Rule 10, Order 8 Rule 1 CPC

PERSON: Kumar Jain, Sirsa, Tehsil Ellenabad, Rani Kusum v. Smt, Kanchan Devi, Shaikh Salim Haji Abdul Khayumsab, Kumar, Zolba v. Keshao, 869(v, Pankaj Sharma, Mohammed Yusuf v. Faij Mohammad, Tamil Nadu v. Union, Mohammed Yusuf

NORP: J.1

DATE: 16.4.2009, 1908, 90 days, the year 2002-03, 13876, that day, 13.2.2009, 30 days, 90 days, a period of, 30 days, 90 days, 2005, 2005, 2008, 2007, 2006, 2006, 5755, 90 days, thirty days, thirty days, later than ninety days, 2000, 30 days, 30 days, 60 days, the period of, 90 days, 30 days, 90 days, time.10, the year 2002, 19.7.2002, 14.5.2004, about three years, 90 days, a period of, one year

ORG: Additional Civil Judge, CPC, Ellenabad, Court, CPC, Court, Learned Counsel, CPC, the Supreme Court, the High Court, RCR, SC, Panjon Ltd., M/s Dhingra Enterprises, Varun Electronics v. M/s Daewoo Anchor Electronic Ltd., CPC, the Supreme Court, RCR, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, CPC, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Apex Court, Salem Advocate Bar Association, Sambhaji and Ors, the Supreme Court, Court, Court, CPC, CPC, Court, Court, CPC, M/s Panjon Ltd., Court, Court, CPC, the Supreme Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, CPC, the Apex Court, Court, Court

CARDINAL: 5, 8, 5/1, 3-17, 6/2/2(4-4, 3,50,000/-.3, 1.8.2008, 19.8.2008, 13.10.2008, 18.11.2008, 13.2.2009, 2009(1, 383(ii, 4, 823(iv, 2, 2, 3, 407, 3, 2009(1, 633.6, 1, 2, 492, one, 6.7.2002, 28.1.2004, about 31.1.2005, 3

PRODUCT: 1 marla

GPE: Sq, District Sirsa, Gangabai, Counsel, Counsel, Counsel

FAC: Hanumangarh Road

ORDINAL: first, first