Anshumalee Sood Vs. Sudarshana Kumari Blagan and anr.

Decided On : Apr-21-2010

Court : Delhi

LAW: Order 1 Rule 10, Order 1 Rule 10, the Hindu Succession Act, Section 23 of the Act, Section 6 of the Act, Section 6(1, Section 6 of the Act, Section 6(1, Order 1 Rule 10, Section 6 of the Act, Section 6, Section 6, the Registration Act, Section 6(3, Section 3(2, Section 6, Order I Rule 10, Order 1 Rule 10, Order XXII Rule 4

GPE: Muralidhar, Delhi, New Delhi, New Delhi, Pakistan, Lahore, Pakistan, New Delhi - 110 014, that:(i, Pakistan, Pakistan, Gangabai, India, coparceners.11, Ceylon, I.L.R., A.C., Mitakshara, Mitakshara, Mitakshara, Mitakshara, Mitakshara, Mitakshara, Mitakshara

NORP: J.1, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Maharashtra, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Joint Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Joint Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu

PERSON: Devi Kumari Sood, Smt, Sudarshana Kumari Blagan, Tulsan Devi, Defendant Nos, Devi Kumari Sood, Mela Ram Sood, Defendant Nos, Defendant Nos, Petitioner, Devi Kumari Sood, Jangpura Extension, Tulsan Devi, Devi Kumari Sood, Jangpura Extension, Devi Kumari Sood, Sudershana Kumari Blagan, Shri Din Dayal Sood, Devi Kumari Sood, Rukhmabai, Lala Laxminarayan AIR, Mela Ram Sood, Petitioner, Petitioner, Petitioner, Karsandas Dharamsey v., Buddanna, Bangalore, Narayan Rao Sham Rao Deshmukh, Mayne, Mayne, Schedule, Schedule

CARDINAL: 3, 791, 1, 4, 1, 1, 2, 2, 3, 1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 1, 3, 40,000, 1, 2, 2, 3, 40,000, 3, 4, 3, two, 3, one, 2, 1/3rd, 3, 3, 3.6, 10, two, 264, 2004.(2, 1, not.(4, 2005.(5, 3, 40,000, 3.19

DATE: 1984, 15th July 2009, August 1984, 9th July 1984, 11th December 1989, 25th January 1984, 15th April 1984, 20th December 2001, August 1984, October 2007, 1956, 2005, October 2005, 2005, 2005, 1960 335.(ii, 20th December 2004, 2005, the years, a hundred years ago, 1908, 1523, 1957, 2005, 2005, the 20th day of December, 2005, 2005, 2005, 2005, the 20th day of December, 1908, 2005, 2005, 1984, 1984, 2001, 2005, twenty-five years, 20th December 2004

ORG: the Commercial Civil Judge, CCJ, Plaintiff, CPC, LR, CPC, I-13, Jangpura Extension, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Smt, LR, Plaintiff, CPC, CPC, the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, the Land & Development Office, Government of India, Smt, the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, the Hindu Undivided Family', CCJ, Reliance, the Government of India, Learned Counsel, CPC, the Supreme Court, the Judicial Committee, AIR 1985 SC 716, the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, CCJ, Court, CCJ, CPC, Plaintiff, CPC

FAC: 5th September 1975, 5th September 1975

ORDINAL: 9th, 7th, 5th, first, 9th

QUANTITY: about 200 square yards

LANGUAGE: English, English

LOC: the Mitakshara Law