Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Anurag Kumar Gangwar @ Deepu Vs. State and ors.
Decided On : Mar-26-2010
Court : Delhi
LAW: Article 226 of the Constitution, Section 363, Hindu Marriage Act, the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, Section 363, Section 363, Section 363, Section 366, Section 366, Section 376, Section 366, Section 376, Section 366, Indian Penal Code, Section 363, Section 361, Section 363, Section 363
PERSON: V.K. Jain, Anurag Kumar, Anurag Kumar, Maula Garh, Anurag Kumar, JCC Delhi, Sunil Kumar, Anr, LRC 56, Shyam, Anr, L.J. 1216(1, Mahabir, Railway Station
NORP: J.1
CARDINAL: 292/2009, 1, 2, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3., 3, 3, 3, 292/2009, 1, 170, 208, 2, 124, 256, 55, 376, 570, 366, 366, 3, 3, 3, 292/2009, 3
ORG: Police Station Vijay Vihar, IPC, FIR, Court, Registrar, Chandosi, Muradabad, Court, Police Station Vijay Vihar, Court, CCC, Court, FIR, IPC, IPC, IPC, The Hon'ble Supreme Court, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, State, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, IPC, Court, the High Court, the High Court, Criminal Law General 3044, IPC, IPC, Police Station Vijay Vihar, Nari
PRODUCT: Shri Rakesh Kumar, DLT 428
DATE: 17th June, 2009, 10th June, 2009, 12th June, 2009, 26th June, 2009, 1999, 21 years, 2006(1, 2007, 2005, 2005, 2006, the age of 15 years, less than 18 years of age, more than 17 years, 1995, LG 3974, 18 years of age, 1994, 1994, about fifteen days, the day, sixteen years, less than eighteen years of age, more than sixteen years of age, fourteen years of old, more than eighteen years, 1994, two to three days
GPE: Muradabad, Singh v. State, Manish, Singh, Delhi, Ravi, Madhuri, Karnataka v. Sureshbabu, Delhi, Piara, Singh v. State of Punjab, age.10, Muradabad
LOC: Shiv Mandir, yet.5, Single
FAC: Bala Saheb