Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Consep India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Cepco Industries Pvt. Ltd.

Decided On : Mar-26-2010

Court : Delhi

Notice (8): Undefined index: topics [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 36]
Warning (2): Invalid argument supplied for foreach() [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 39]

LAW: Section 14(1)(a, Section 4, Section 14, Section 14(1, Section 3(c, the Indian Evidence Act, Section 14(1)(a, Section 4, Section 4, Section 15(1, the DRC Act, Section 14(2, the DRC Act, Section 15(1, the DRC Act, the DRC Act, Section 14(1)(a, the DRC Act, the DRC Act, the DRC Act, Section 14(1)(a, Section 6A and Section 8, Section 4, Constitution, Section 8, Section 8, Section 6A and Section 8, Section 106, the DRC Act, Section 111 Sub-section (h, Order XX Rule 12, the Indian Evidence Act, the Division Bench, Rule 12, Order XX Rule 12, Section 2(12, Section 2(12, the Civil Procedure Code

ORG: Reva Khetrapal, WC, Connaught Place, the Court of the Rent Controller, the Delhi Rent Control Act, inter alia, House-Tax, Electricity, Water, the Delhi Rent Control Act, the Court of the Additional Rent Controller, Additional Rent Controller, the Rent Control Tribunal, Tribunal, the Additional Rent Controller, Suit No, inter alia, the Rent Control Tribunal, the Rent Control Tribunal, the Tribunal on, Rent Control Tribunal, CEPCO Industries Pvt. Ltd., CYCLE Equipment Pvt, CEPCO Industries Pvt. Ltd., the Delhi Rent Control Act, Civil Courts, the Civil Court, CYCLE Equipment Pvt. Ltd., CEPCO Industries Pvt. Ltd., the Additional Rent Controller, CEPCO Industries Pvt. Ltd., Rent Control Tribunal, Rent Control Tribunal, the Delhi Rent Control Act, the Delhi Rent Control Act, Rent Control Tribunal, documents:(i, the Delhi Rent Control Act, Additional Rent Controller, the Delhi Rent Control Act, Additional Rent Controller, Additional Rent Control Tribunal, Court, the Supreme Court, Usha Drager Pvt. Ltd., Steel Authority of India Ltd., Union of India and Ors, Singh Duggal & Co. Ltd., United Bank of India, M.M. Bhagat & Company, Clause 1 and Clause, Brady & Company, Lease Agreement, the Delhi Rent Control Act, CPC, the Delhi Rent Control Act, ARC, ARC, ARC, Additional Rent Controller, the Additional Rent Control Tribunal, the Additional Rent Control Tribunal, Court, Additional Rent Control Tribunal, Tribunal, Additional Rent Control Tribunal, CPC, the Additional Rent Controller, ARC, Tribunal, ARC, ARC, ARC, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Supreme Court, Midnapur Zamindari Co. Ltd., Naresh, Board, Tribunal, the Tribunal for the reason, the Delhi Rent Control Act, Tribunal, the Delhi Rent Control Act, Court, Shalimar Paints Ltd., Bani Jagtiani Trust, the Rent Control Act, Court, HUF, Union of India and Ors, the Rent Control Act, Sections 4, the Delhi Rent Control Act, DLT 419, Crack Detectives Pvt. Ltd., Standard Pharmaceuticals Ltd., National Cooperative Consumer Federation of India Ltd., Jwala Pershad Ashok Kumar Chopra, DLT, Nopany Investments, HUF, Section 6A and Section 8, Section, Revision of rent.- Notwithstanding, Additional Trial, M/s. Cycle Equipment Pvt. Ltd., CYCLE Equipment Pvt. Ltd.', Exhibit, DW-1, ARC, Additional Rent Control Tribunal, The Transfer of Property Act, Court, p.a.50, Court, Court, Order XX Rule 12(c, CPC, CPC, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, National Radio & Electronic Co. Ltd., Motion Pictures Association, State Bank of Bikaner, State Bank of Patiala, Motor & General Finance Ltd., AIR 1996, Court, Anant Raj Agencies Properties, State Bank of Patiala, Court, Connaught Place, Bank, the Supreme Court, D.C. Oswal v., V.K. Subbiah, Ors, AIR 1992, SC, the Supreme Court, AIR 1996, Court, the D.C. Oswal's, Court, Court, the Apex Court, D.C. Oswal v., V.K. Subbiah, AIR 992 SC 184.22, Court, Division Bench, Court, G.K. Kathpalia, Motor & General Finance Ltd., Court, International Pvt. Ltd., Saraswati Industrial Sundictes Ltd., Court, Court, Court, Court, Order XX CPC, Court, property;(b, Court, Order XX Rule, CPC, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, AIR 1967 SC, CPC, Court, CPC, Court, I.S. Ratta, the Supreme Court, The Board of Trustees, Trial Court, the Supreme Court, The Board of Trustees, the Tirumalai Tirupathi Devasthanam, The Supreme Court, CPC, the Devasthanam Committee, Trial Court, the Supreme Court, the Trial Court, Mahant, p.a, the Trial Court, TDS, the Division Bench, p.a, Court, Court

NORP: J.1, P.M.

DATE: 23rd May, 2007, 1st December, 1976, the first three years, the next two years, five years, about 29th November, 1983, 1958, Monthly, 1st September, 1997, about the year 1984, 1958, the first three years, the next following two years, two years, 1st September, 7th March, 1999, one year, December, 1981, 6th December, 2003, 21st September, 2005, the month of November, 2005, October, 6th December, 2003, around 30th November, 1983, 6th December, 2003, 21st September, 2005, 1st December, 1976, 8th May, 1986, 12 months, 1st September, 1981, 3,780/-, 2,700/-, 22nd September, 1983, 12 months, 6th December, 2003, 15 days, 21st September, 2005, 26th September, 2005, monthly, 21st September, 2005, 19.12.2006, 1958, 01.12.1988, monthly, 2,700/-, November, 1983, 29.11.1983, 1/3).(iii, 1st September, 1997, 22nd September, 1983, 2005, 2008, 2006, 2000, 2001 IV AD, monthly, three years, monthly, 2,700/- per month, the 10th day, the 1st day, the three years, two years, every two years, 01.12.1981, 22nd September, 1983, 01.09.1982, 09.07.1987, three years, every two years, three years, two years, monthly, 82 months, 3/4 months, monthly, 7th March, 1999, 16, 1212, one year, December 1981, 700/- per month, the month, the month, one month, 14.3.1986, stand.11, 2,700/-, 22.09.1983, 01.09.1982 to 31.08.1983, 12 months, 1995, 2003, the 1st, 3500/-, 2002, 6, 2009, 2006, 2002, 1998, 2008, every three years, the expiry of thirty days, 1982, 2,700/- per month, a month to month, 15 days, 1882, 15 day, 6, the last three years, the month of November, 2005, 3,780/- per month, 1872, 2008, 2002 IV AD, 92 (2001, 32, 1993, 2002 IV AD, 733, 08.01.1999, 32, 1-1989, 6,000/- per month, the year 1974, 10,000/- per month, 1991, 92 (2001, 1992, 2008, the beginning of the year 2006, three years, 1965, 1965, June 7, 1933 i.e., January 10, 1946, March 28, 1952, 45,000/- per month, the month of November, 2005, 6, 16188/2007, 17682/2007

LOC: Additional District, appellant.10, the Memorandum and Articles of Association

CARDINAL: one, one, one, 9, 11, 1982.5, 01.12.1976, 3,240/-, 150/-, 38,880/-, 2005.9, 175, 2,700/-, 3,240/-, 12, nine, nine, 1, 1, 2, 1, 2, 2, 700/-, 3, 1, 2, 3,500/-, 01.12.1981, 9, 1/5).(vi, 1, 17, 58, 136, 11, 7, 12, 790.19, 1/1, 11, 18(a, 9, 1, 1A, 1/5, 1/6, 5, 11, 18(a, 2, 700/-, 3,240/-, 3,240/-, 3, 2, 700/-, 3,240/-, 3, only 10, one, 12, 3, 1986/96, 12, 3, one, 3, 2, 3, 1.9.1982, 3,780/-, 10, 12, 12, 3,780/-, 12, 4, 6, 107, 22, two, two, two, two, 61, 457, 9, 21, 162, 129, 62, 733, 74, 842, 2, 728, 1, 1, 4, 1882).39, 1, 2, 3, 3, 1/1, 1, 1, 4, 4, 21.9.2005, 24, 21.9.2005, 0, 3,780/-, 1, 2, 3, 21.9.2005, 26.9.2005, 21.9.2005, 4, 4, 5, 5, 6, 8, 5, 1, 6, 8, 3 8,880, 150/-, 150/-, 1, 2, 38,880/-, 50/-, 50/-, 57, 104, 246, 122, 120, 1, 50/-, 1, 184, 1, 431, 2, 6, 104, 246, 1, 21.09.2005, 150/-, 1, 155, 12, 18, two, 1, 2, 40, 5, 50/-, 5, 7, 7, 9, 9, 1 to 6, 7, 9, 329/2007

ORDINAL: second, first, 5th, second, first, first, second, first

GPE: New Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, p.a., Counsel, month.16, Delhi, L&DO, Delhi, Delhi, perform.33, Deva Ram's, Ambalal, Ld, Delhi, Delhi, p.a., Delhi, M.R., Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, New Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, p.a., Counsel, Counsel, Devasthanam, Devasthanam, p.a., p.a.

TIME: 2,700/- p.m., 3,240/- p.m., 3,780/- p.m., 3,780/- p.m., 2,700/- p.m., 3,240/- p.m., 3,780/- p.m., 3,780/- p.m., 3,780/- p.m., 3,780/- p.m., 2,700/- p.m., 2,700/- p.m., 3,780/- p.m., 2,700/- p.m., 3,780/- p.m., 3,780/- p.m., 3,780/- p.m., 3,500/- p.m., 3,780/- p.m. Clause, 3,780/- p.m., 3,780/- p.m., 3,780/- p.m., 3,780/- p.m., 3,780/- p.m., 3,780/- p.m., 3,780/- p.m., 2,700/- p.m., 3,780/- p.m., 3,780/- p.m., 3,780/- p.m., 3,780/- p.m., 3,780/- p.m., 2,700/- p.m., 3,780/- p.m., 3,500/- p.m., under this Act, 3,780/- p.m. w.e.f, 275/- p.m., 400/- p.m., 25,000/- p.m.

FAC: 01.12.1981

PERCENT: 24%, 20%, 20%, 20%, 20%, 10%, 10%, 24%, 24%, 12%, 24%, 16.5%, 6%, 16.5%, 12%, 12%, 9%, 9%

PERSON: Saurabh Kirpal, B.B. Gupta, B.B. Gupta, Gupta, M.K. Bhagwagar, Draegerwerk Aktiengesellschaft, Anr, Sangramsinh P. Gaekwad, Shanta Devi P. Gaekwad, Gautam Sarup, Leela Jetly, Rs, Nos, Rs, Saurabh Kirpal, Kirpal, Deva Ram v., Ishwar Chand, Ganga Bai, Narayan Roy, Rs, Raghunandan Saran Ashok Saran, Articles 14, Kirpal, B.B. Gupta, Ram Prakash, D.N. Shrivastava, P.S. Malhotra, Gyan Chand Jain, Anr, Santokh Singh, consensus.40, Rs, Gupta, Gupta, Gupta, Doris Randhawa, Jaipur v. I.S. Ratta, Anant Raj Agencies Properties, Nirulas, Vinod Khanna, Bakshi Sachdev, Bakshi Sachdev, LRs v. Concord, Vinod Khanna, Bakshi Sachdev, Rupees 10,000/-, S. Kumar v., Nirulas, Doris Randhawa, M.K. Bhagwagar, Gopalakrishna Pillai, Meenakshi Ayal, Order XX Rule, Paragraphs 16, Rs, CM Nos

PRODUCT: DLT 355.(ii, 7 SCC 120.(vi, the Lease Deed, Vijay, DLT 584, DLT 97

QUANTITY: 900 square feet

LANGUAGE: English

EVENT: Clause 10, SC 1231, SC 1231

WORK_OF_ART: 01.09.1987 (Exhibit PW-1/4, the Lease Deed, Lease Deed

MONEY: ten per cent, 6 per cent, 6 per cent, 6 per cent, 6 per cent

View Full Judgment


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //