Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Reliance Industries Limited (Petroleum Division) Rep. by the President Marketing, Vs. Usha Devi

Decided On : Apr-28-2010

Court : Chennai

LAW: Section 8, Section 8, Section 8, Section 8, the Civil Procedure Code, Article 227 of the Constitution of India, Article 227 of the Constitution of India, Article 227 of the Constitution of India, Article 227 of the Constitution of India.12, Section 8 of Arbitration, Section 8, Section 8, Section 8, Article 227 of the Constitution of India.15, Article 227 of the Constitution, Article 227, Article 227 of the Constitution in cases of, Article 227, Article 227, Section 8, Section 2, Section 8, Section 8, Section 42, Section 2(e, Section 8 of the Act, Constitution, Article 227 of the Constitution taken away, Section 115 CPC, Article 227, Article 227, Article 226, Article 227, Constitution, Article 226, Article 226 of the Constitution, Article 226 of the Constitution, Article 227 of the Constitution, Article 226, Constitution, Section 8, Article 227 of the Constitution, Article 227 of the Constitution, Article 227, Section 8, Section 8, Section 8, Section 45 of the Act of 1996, Section 45, Order 6 Rule 4 CPC, Section 45 of the Act, Section 45, Section 8, the Arbitration Agreement, Section 8(1, Article 227 of the Constitution of India, Section 8, the Civil Procedure Code, Section 8(2, Order 39, Order 39, Section 9, the Companies Act, the Company Law, Section 8

ORG: ORDERM, the Additional District Court, Fast Track Court, the Additional District Court, Dharapuram, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Civil Revision Petition, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, The High Court, Court, Court, Court, Reliance, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, SC, the Supreme Court, the High Court, the High Court, High Court, Court, the High Court, the High Court, Court, the High Court, Court, Court, Tribunal, the High Court, The High Court, the High Court, P. Nand Gajapathi Raju, the Supreme Court, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, Court, Court, party;(3, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., CTC, the Supreme Court, SC, the Supreme Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Courts, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Courts, the High Court, the High Court, Court, the High Court, Court, Court, the High Court, The High Court, High Court, High Court, The High Court, The High Court, Court of Appeal, High Court, Court, The High Court, Court, the High Court, the High Court, Kuttakaran Machine Tools Ltd., the Supreme Court, Arbitration, Arbitration, the High Court, Court, Magma Leasing and Finance Ltd., the Supreme Court, Court, the Supreme Court, the High Court, the High Courts, H.P.C. Ltd., Ors, Court, Court, Enmas Engineering Pvt. Ltd., MLJ, Court, I., Arbitration Agreement and Arbitration, Arbitration Clause, The Arbitraiton Clause, Arbitration Agreement, Arbitration, Union of India, CTC, Court, Arbitration, Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd., CTC 1, Court, Arbitration Court, Judicial Authority, Investments, CTC 234, Court, Suit, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, Court, Fast Track Court, Dharapuram, Fast Track Court, Dharapuram, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Duraisamy, Sub Registrar, Dharapuram, Court, Union of India, the Supreme Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, National Insurance Co. Ltd., Boghara Polyfab Pvt. Ltd., CTC, the Supreme Court, Court, the Arbitral Tribunal, Arbitration, Arbitral Tribunal, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Supreme Court, Court, House Productions Pvt. Ltd v. Meediya Plus, CTC, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, CTC, Arbitration, the Civil Court, Court, The Civil Court, Cynosure Investments Private Ltd., CTC, Court, Arbitration Clause, the Company Law Board, Sections 397, the Apex Court, Sukanya Holdings Pvt. Ltd., CTC, Court, Gouri Spinning Mills Ltd., Sporting Pasttime India Ltd., Kasturi, Sons Ltd., CTC, Court, Arbitration Clause, the Company Petition, Company Law Board, Haryana Telecom Ltd., Sterlite Industries, Section 8 Application, a Civil Court, the Apex Court, Arbitration Clause, the Civil Court, the Company Law Board, the Company Petition, DLWL, the Company Petition, Court, Court, Court, Fast Track Court, Dharapuram, Court, The Civil Revision Petition

PERSON: Jaichandren, J.1, Achutananda Baidya v., Kumar Gayen, Law, Surya Dev Rai v. Ram Chander Rai, Certiorari, Supervisory, N. Rinivasa v., Anr, V. Potluri Madhavilata, Anr, Radhey Shyam, Chhabhi Nath, Sri Prabh Transport, Andritz Oy, Rajesh Damani, Sundaram Brake Lining Ltd., Manjula Udaya Shankar 2009, R. Ramanathan 2002, Bal Bhawan v., N. Radhakrishnan v. Maestro Engineers, O. Aslam Sait, Jayes H., Adimoolam, M.K., R. Samarasam, maintainable.23

DATE: 12.5.2009, 2008, 2008, 2008, the month of October, 2008, 1996, 1996, 2008, 1996, 2009, 2008, 2008, 24.4.2009, 12.5.2009, 2009, 1996, 2009, 1908, 12.5.2009, 2009, 1996, injustice.11, 1996, 1996, 2009, 2008, 1996, 2008, 1996, 1996, 12.5.2009, 1997, 76, 2000, 1996, 2003, 2003, 1999, the initial years, later years, 2009, 2009, 2009, 2001, 2007, 1996, 1996, 1996, 2008, 2008, 12.5.2009, 12.5.2009, 2.6.2009, 1996, 12.5.2009, 12.5.2009, 2008, 2.6.2009, 12.5.2009, 2.6.2009, 1996, 2.6.2009, 1908, 2.6.2009, 12.5.2009, 2.6.2009, 2003, 2008, 2010, 72, 2005, 2001, 2007, invoked.11, 2003, 2003, 2006, 1999, 2008, 2009, 1996, 2.6.2009, 2009, four weeks

GPE: I.A., O.S., O.S., O.S., I.A., I.A., I.A., I.A., O.S., I.A., I.A., O.S., I.A., O.S., I.A., I.A., M.P., I.A., facts.10, M.P., I.A., I.A., I.A., Dealership, O.S., O.S., I.A., I.A., I.A., Clause, India, I.A., I.A., I.A., O.S., I.A., I.A., Madhivadanan, I.A., I.A.

CARDINAL: 671, 295, 295, 295, 10,00,000/-, ten, 20,921/-, Three, Three, 671, 20.5.2005, 4, 20.5.2005, 671, 671, 295, 8, 19, 24.4.2009, 671, 295, 24.4.2009, 12.5.2009, 24.4.2009, 12.5.2009, 671, 295, 2.6.2009.8, 671, 23.4.2009.9, 1, 20.5.2005, 29.1.2008, 671, 1, 8, 20.5.2005, 12.5.2009, 671, 24.4.2009, 671, 20.5.2005, 20.5.2005, 295, 295, 671, 12.5.2009, 671, 20.5.2005, 29.1.2008, 20.5.2005, 60, 671, 5, 4, 539, 8(1, 8(2, 3, 438, 6, 226, 227, one, two, one, 226, 227, 227, two, two, 227, nine, 5, 280, 10, 103, one, 5, 616, 2, 29.1.1999, 2, 3, 4, 3, 4, 2, one, 671, 671, 671, 295, 671, 24.4.2009, 1, 3, 12.5.2009, 12.5.2009, 2.6.2009, 671, ten, 3, 9, 671, 4, 1, 2, 51, 1, 1, 2, two, 3, 269, 3, 524, 16.2.1996, 398, 402, 403, 2, 431, 3, 4, 377, 398, 5, 688, 2, 659, 19, 19

PERCENT: 12%, 12%, 12%

MONEY: Twenty thousand nine hundred and twenty one, 583, 540

EVENT: the Dealership Agreement, Clause 59, the Dealership Agreement, Sections 5, the Dealership Agreement, Sections 5, the Dealership Agreement, the Dealership Agreement, Clause 59, the Dealership Agreement, the Dealership Agreement, Clauses 59, the Dealership Agreement, the Dealership Agreement

ORDINAL: first, first, Firstly, Secondly, third, first

NORP: English, English

WORK_OF_ART: a Foreign Award

PRODUCT: Agreement, 740, 854, Sections 397

LOC: Additional District, Additional District, Additional District

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //