J.P. Vijayakumar and Mrs. H. Vijayakumar Vs. S. Ranjan and Sports Station India Pvt. Ltd.

Decided On : Aug-04-2006

Court : Chennai

LAW: Section 10(2)(i, Section 25, Order 30, Section 138, Section 138, the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 10(2)(iii, Section 10(2)(ii)(b, Section 10(2)(i, Section 10(2)(ii)(a, Section 10(2)(iii, Section 10(3)(a)(iii, Section 10(2)(ii)(b

GPE: Rajeswaran, R.C.A., Act.3, MRP, Counsel, AIR, Counsel, Appeal, Counsel, Counsel

NORP: J.1

ORG: This Civil Revision Petition, the VII Court of Small Causes, the XIII Court of Small Causes, the Revision Petition, The Revision Petitioners, Court of Small Causes, Chennai, the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease & Rent Control) Act, RCOP, the Rent Control Appellate Authority, the Appellate Authority, Revision Petition, the Revision Petitioners, First Floor, the Revision Petitioners, The Revision Petitioners, the Revision Petitioners, RCOP, the Revision Petitioners, the Revision Petitioners, the Revision Petitioners, RCOP, The Appellate Authority, the Revision Petitioners, RCOP, Counsel for the Revision Petitioners, the Revision Petitioners, Appellate, RCOP, the Appellate Authority, Shah Phoolchand, Parvati Bai, RCOP, the Appellate Authority, RCOP, the Revision Petitioners, Court, L.W. 221, Bros, RCOP, the Revision Petitioners, Exs, the Revision Petitioners, the Revision Petitioners, the Rent Controller, RCOP, the 'Noble Enterprises', The Appellate Authority, RCOP, RCOP, the Revision Petitioners, RCOP, RCOP, Revision Petition, the Appellate Authority, S.C. 865, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the Central Provinces, Berar Letting of Houses, Court, Court, Appellate, Chhotelal Pyarelal's, Court, Court, the High Court, Court, Special Leave, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Kerala High Court, the Revision Petitioners, Court, Court, the Appellate Authority, the Revision Petitioners, Appellate Authority, the Appellate Authority, NIKE, Counsel for the Revision Petitioners Ex, Authority, RCOP, the Rent Controller, Appeal, Court, Rent, the Revision Petitioners, the Revision Petitioners, The Revision Petitioners, Rent, the Revision Petitioners, Exs, Rent, The Revision Petitioners, The Revision Petitioners, the Appellate Authority, the Revision Petitioners, The Civil Revision Petition

DATE: 13.1.2003, 10(2)(ii)(a, 1960, 13.1.2003, 13.1.2003, 18,634/- per month, 13,552/- per month, the period December 1999 to May 2000, the 1st, monthly, the 1st, the 1st, the 1st, the 1st, the 1st, 1989, the 1st, the 1st, the 1st, the 1st, the 1st, 1989, 1949, 1908, a number of years, the 1st, the 1st, 1989, the 1st, the 1st, the 1st, the 1st, the 1st, the 1st, the 1st, the 1st, the 1st, the 1st, the 1st, 22, the 1st, the 1st, the 1st, the 1st, the 1st, the 1st, 16448, 19406, 2003

CARDINAL: 366/2002, 28.3.2002, 926/2000, 926/2000, 10(2)(ii)(b, 10(2)(iii, 10(3)(a)(ii, 28.3.2002, 366/2002, 29,000/-, 926/2000, one, 5., 7, 1, two, 2.4.1999, two, two, 11, one, 1985]1SCR268, 13(3)(vi, 4., 15, 1, 18, 24.4.2000, 1, 2, 24.4.2000, 24.4.2000, 21, 926/2000, one, 366/2002, 23

PERSON: Madras, AIR1996Ker218, Lieya, Kaliappa Chettiar, Nayar, Nayar, Nayar, Nayar, C.M.P. Nos

ORDINAL: 1st, 1st, first, 1st, 1st, first, 1st, 2nd, 2nd, 1st, 2nd, 2nd, first, 1st, 2nd, First, 1st, 1st, 1st, 1st, 1st, 1st, 1st, first, first, 1st, 1st, 2nd, 2nd, 2nd, 2nd, 2nd, 2nd, 2nd, 2nd, 2nd, 2nd, 3rd, 2nd, 2nd, 1st, 1st, 1st, 1st, 1st, first

FAC: Ground Floor

LOC: Purasawalkam

PERCENT: 20%

WORK_OF_ART: Noble Enterprises', Noble Enterprises', 'Noble Enterprises', Noble Enterprises'

PRODUCT: Revision