Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

P. Selvaraj Vs. the Management of Shardlow India Limited,

Decided On : Oct-10-2006

Court : Chennai

LAW: the Payment of Gratuity Act, Section 4(2, Payment of Gratuity Act, Point 1: The Petitioner, Section 4 of the Act, Section 4 of the Act, Section 4 of the Act, Section 4(2, Section 4(2, Section 2[s, Section 2(s, Section 2(s, Section 4(2, Section 2A(i, Article 226 of the Constitution of India.24

ORG: ORDERR, P.G. Case, Gratuity of Rs, Gratuity, the Gratuity of Rs, The Controlling Authority, the Appellate Authority, Payment of Gratuity, the Gratuity amount;The Respondent Management, Gratuity, Counsel for the Petitioner, the Payment of Gratuity Act, Counsel for the Petitioner, LLN, Krishnaveni Textile Mills, Asst, Counsel for the Petitioner, Counsel for the Respondent Management, Management, FJR Page, Executive Engineer, Counsel, Counsel for the Management, Gratuity, Counsel for the Management, Gratuity, Gratuity, Social Welfare Legislation, Court, Counsel, Sri Digvijay Woollen Mills Ltd., The Maharashtra Mills Ltd., Jeewanlal Ltd., Appellate Authority, the Supreme Court, Gratuity, the Judgment of the Gujarat High Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Legislature, Gratuity, Indian Bank rep, Counsel for the Petitioner, Welfare, Welfare Legislation, Gratuity, Gratuity, Counsel for the Management, the Statement of Gratuity, Counsel for the Management, Counsel for the Management, Counsel, LLN, the Controlling Authority, the Appellate Authority, Gratuity, Counsel for the Petitioner, 2004, LLN, Gratuity, Court, 01.03.1982, 01.03.1982, Management, Phonogram, the Workers Union, Counsel for the Respondent Management, Coimbatore, the Respondent Management, Gratuity of Rs, The Controlling Authority, Gratuity, The Controlling Authority, the Controlling Authority, the Division Bench, Gratuity, Gratuity, the Controlling Authority, the Appellate Authority, Jurisdiction, this Writ Petition

NORP: J.1

ORDINAL: third, first, first, first, first

DATE: 1999, the month of July 1998, one year, 09.07.1998, the month of June 1998, the month of July, 1998, 4,082.04, the month of July, 1998, 31 years, 7 months, only 31 years, the month of June, 1998, 1983-84, one year, 1972, 15 days', each completed year, nine days, July 1998, the month of June 1998, one year, the last month, the month of July, 2002, June month, 240 days, one year, years, 31 years, the month, the month of June, 1998, fifteen days', the month, July, 1998, 15 days', 1980, 1984, a month, thirty days, monthly, 26 days, fifteen days', fifteen days', six months, 20 months', fifteen days', 365 days, a year, years, 20 months', monthly, 26 working days, the month, 15 days', 15 days', 15 days', monthly, monthly, 15 days', the month, the month of July, 1998, 2005, the month of July 1998, July, 1998, 09.07.1998, July, 1998, 09.07.1998, June, 1998, 3,720.21, 31 years, June, 1998, the month of July, 4,082.04, the month of April, 1995, 32 years, year, 31 years, one year, one year, 30 years, 7 months, 24 days, 31 years, 2002, the years 1978-1990, the period 23.11.1983 to 22.02.1984, 2002, 10.06.1998, 2001, 1453, at least a month

CARDINAL: 11.02.2000, 4,558, Two, 3., 131.04, 3,951/-, 3,958.78/-, 4, 09.07.1998, 3,958.78, two, 2, 2, 2, 3, 26, 15, 820, 4(2, 103, 338.57, 3,958.78, 131.04, 3,951/-, 4, 363, 1

PRODUCT: Respondent, Chairperson

PERSON: Petitioner, Petitioner, Lokesh Reddy, Anr, Digvijay Woollen Mills, Jeevan Lal's, Digvijay, N. Venkataramani v., Webster, Mill, Atmaram Manjerekar v.N.T.C.[M.N.] Ltd., Sri Sarada Mills, Labour, Rajamani, Petitioner

WORK_OF_ART: the Memorandum of Settlement, the Basic Wages was Rs, produced Memorandum of Settlement under Section 12[3

LOC: the Writ Petitioner, Madras

TIME: 23.11.1983 to 22.02.1984

GPE: 04.06.1984, 08.08.1994, 08.08.1994, 04.06.1984, 08.08.1994

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //