Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. V. Chinnapandi
Decided On : Jan-18-2006
Court : Chennai
LAW: Section 260A, Section 80HHC, Section 80HHC, Section 143(l)(a, Section 143(2, Section 80HHC, Section 80HHC, Section 80HHC, Section 80HHC, Section 80HHC, Section 80HHC, Section 80HHC, Section 28, Section 80HHC of the Act, Section 80HHC, Section 80HHC of the Act, Section 80HHC, Section 80HHC of the Act, Section 80HHC of the Act, Section 80HHC of the Act
FAC: P.P.S. Janarthana Raja
NORP: J.1, Punjab
ORG: the Tribunal in 'C' Bench, Chennai, Tribunal, HUF, P&L, AO, AO, inter alia, AO, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Counsel for the Revenue, inter alia, AO, Court, Amicus Cutiae, K.S. Subbiah Pilial and Co., CIT, inter alia, Haryana High Court, Rani Paliwal v., CIT, AO, Tribunal, AO, Tribunal, AO
DATE: 24th July, 2002, 1995-96, year ended on 31st March, 1995, 29th Nov., 1995, the year, the assessment year, 2,65,019
CARDINAL: 2., 9,37,057, 9,24,967.00Less, 2,65,019.00___________Interest, 4B, 1, 2003]260ITR304(Mad, 1, 1, 6,33,454, two
TIME: 2,65,019, 2,65,019
MONEY: 90 per cent, 90 per cent, 90 per cent, 90 per cent, 90 per cent, 90 per cent, 90 per cent, 90 per cent, 90 per cent, 90 per cent, 90 per cent, 90 per cent
ORDINAL: first
LOC: Expln
PERSON: V. Ramachandran, V. Ramachandran
GPE: Act.5, Clause, Clauses, India, India