Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. V. Chinnapandi

Decided On : Jan-18-2006

Court : Chennai

LAW: Section 260A, Section 80HHC, Section 80HHC, Section 143(l)(a, Section 143(2, Section 80HHC, Section 80HHC, Section 80HHC, Section 80HHC, Section 80HHC, Section 80HHC, Section 80HHC, Section 28, Section 80HHC of the Act, Section 80HHC, Section 80HHC of the Act, Section 80HHC, Section 80HHC of the Act, Section 80HHC of the Act, Section 80HHC of the Act

FAC: P.P.S. Janarthana Raja

NORP: J.1, Punjab

ORG: the Tribunal in 'C' Bench, Chennai, Tribunal, HUF, P&L, AO, AO, inter alia, AO, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Counsel for the Revenue, inter alia, AO, Court, Amicus Cutiae, K.S. Subbiah Pilial and Co., CIT, inter alia, Haryana High Court, Rani Paliwal v., CIT, AO, Tribunal, AO, Tribunal, AO

DATE: 24th July, 2002, 1995-96, year ended on 31st March, 1995, 29th Nov., 1995, the year, the assessment year, 2,65,019

CARDINAL: 2., 9,37,057, 9,24,967.00Less, 2,65,019.00___________Interest, 4B, 1, 2003]260ITR304(Mad, 1, 1, 6,33,454, two

TIME: 2,65,019, 2,65,019

MONEY: 90 per cent, 90 per cent, 90 per cent, 90 per cent, 90 per cent, 90 per cent, 90 per cent, 90 per cent, 90 per cent, 90 per cent, 90 per cent, 90 per cent

ORDINAL: first

LOC: Expln

PERSON: V. Ramachandran, V. Ramachandran

GPE: Act.5, Clause, Clauses, India, India

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //