Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Lakshmi Trust Co.

Decided On : Dec-18-2006

Court : Chennai

LAW: Section 271D, Section 269SS, Section 271E, section 269, Section 269SS, Section 269T of the Act, Section 271D, Section 271E, Section 271D, Section 269SS

ORG: P.D. Dinakaran, ITA, the Appellate Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals, 30.4.2001, the Appellate Tribunal, Sections 269SS, Court, CIT, Kundrathur Finance, Chit Co., CIT, Ratna Agencies, the Appellate Tribunal, Court, CIT, Kundrathur Finance, Chit Co., Apex Court, Directior of Inspection (Investigation, the Appellate Tribunal, The Appellate Tribunal, Tribunal, Court, CIT, Ratna Agencies, Tribunal, Court

NORP: J.1

DATE: 29.5.2003, 1188, the assessment year 1997-98, 1961

PERSON: genuine2, Narayanaswamy, Kum, levy penalty.7

CARDINAL: 60,000/-, 271E, 269, two, 2006]283ITR329(Mad, 2006]284ITR609(Mad, 2006]283ITR329(Mad, 2002]254ITR258(SC, 2006]284ITR609(Mad

GPE: Erode, Asst

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //