Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Areva T and D India Limited, (Formerly Known as Alstom Ltd.) Vs. the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax
Decided On : Nov-08-2006
Court : Chennai
LAW: Section 260A, Section 143(2, the Income Tax Act, Section 143(2, Section 50, Section 45 of the Act, Section 143(1)(a, Section 148, Section 143(3, Section 234D of Rs, Section 148, Section 143(2, Section 143(2, Section 148, Section 143(1)(a, Section 148, Section 147 of the Act, Section 148, Section 148, Section 234A of the Act, Section 143(2, Section 148, Section 143(2, Section 148, Section 147, Section 139.It, Section 139(1, Section 139(8, Section 148, Section 148, Section 148, Section 143(2, Section 148, Section 143(2, Section 148, Section 260A, Section 147, Section 143(2, Section 143(2, Section 147 of the Act, Section 147, Section 143(2, Section 143 of the Act, Section 147, Section 147, Section 147, Section 143(2, Section 147, Section 144A of the Act, Section 23(2, Section 143(2, Section 23(3, Section 23(2, Section 23(2, Section 23(2, Section 23(2, Section 23(3, Section 23(3, Section 23(2, Section 143(2, Section 143(2, Section 143(2, Section 143(2, Section 148, Section 143(2, Section 143(2
FAC: P.P.S. Janarthana Raja, income?4
NORP: J.1, Punjab, Punjab, Punjab, Punjab
DATE: 1961, 21.07.2006, 2236, 21.08.2006, 1961, year 1999-2000, Setty?8, year, 1999-2000, 31.12.1999, 31.12.1999, 17.11.2003, year 1999-2000, 19.12.2003, 24.12.2003, 16.12.2004, 31.12.1999 as Return, the assessment year 1999-2000, 17.01.2005, 17.01.2005, Dec. 03 to, the previous year, year, 18.12.2004, 20.12.2004, 17.01.2005, 31.12.1999, 17.01.2005, 17.01.2005, 12 months, April 1, 1989, twelve months, 30th July 1998, 30th July 1998, 30th July 1998, October 1998, five assessment years, 2006
ORG: the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai, Court, the Appellate Tribunal, Appellate Tribunal, Return of Income, the Appellate Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, Appellant, the Allahabad High Court, the Appellate Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, CIT, KPV, Shaikh Mohammed Rowther & Co. 1995, the Apex Court, B.C. Srinivasa, the Appellate Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, High Voltage and Medium Voltage Switchgears, Assessing, Section 234A & 234B, the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals, The Appellate Tribunal, Assessing, Tribunal, Tribunal, Learned Standing Counsel, Tribunal, Standing Counsel, Assessing, Tribunal, Tribunal, Assessing, Assessing, Assessing, Return, Assessing, Assessing, Assessing, Assessing, Assessing, the Assessing Officer.iv, Court, Court, the Tribunal under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, Haryana High Court, CIT, Haryana High Court, Court, Tribunal, Haryana High Court, CIT (P & H, Court, Court, Haryana High Court, Rajasthan High Court, Allahabad, Appellate, the Appellate Tribunal, the High Court, Appellate, Court, Appellate, Appellate, Allahabad, the Rajasthan High Court, Appellate, High Court, Learned Counsel, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, Tribunal
PERSON: Bench, Rajamani Devi v., 15.9 Crores, 9.94 Crores, M. Chellappan, Vipan Khanna, Driveshafts, Sant Baba, Mohan Singh v. Commissioner, Gyan Prakash Gupta, Return, Order, assessment.148.(1, Rule, M. Chellappan, valid?In, Vipan Khanna v., Vipan Khanna v. CIT, Vipan Khanna v. CIT, Vipan Khanna v., Sant Baba, Mohan Singh v. Commissioner, Gyan Prakash Gupta, Gyan Prakash Gupta, Rajasthan High Court, Driveshafts, M.P. Nos
CARDINAL: 20.12.2004, 18.12.2004, 17.1.2005, 20.12.2004, 1937]5ITR631(All, 5., 4,89,08,241/-, 31.03.1999, 29.03.2000, 17.11.2003, 31.03.2005, 147, 28.03.2005, 6.06, 7.69, 3.59, 60.77, 2006]281ITR444(Mad, 259, 19, 9, 1973]90ITR197(All, 22.12.1999, 29.03.2000, 18.12.2004, 20.12.2004, 24.12.2004, 05.01.2005, 28.03.2005, 24.12.2004, 24.12.2004, 05.01.2005, 20.12.2004, 24.12.2004, 18.12.2004, 22.12.1999, 2006]281ITR444(Mad, 1973]90ITR197(All, two, 259, 19, 1, 2
PRODUCT: Appellant, the 'Act', Section 115JA
GPE: Assessee, India, law.5, law.7, law.9, India
EVENT: Tax LR 675
TIME: 03.30 p.m., 03.30 p.m., 03.30 p.m.
ORDINAL: second, second, 26th
PERCENT: 50%, only 40%