Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

G. Ramamoorthy Vs. the Board of Directors of Hindustan Photo Films Manufacturing Company Ltd.,

Decided On : Nov-13-2002

Court : Chennai

LAW: Rule 25, Rule 25, Rule 32, Article 226, the Constitution Bench, Rule 35, Rule 23, Rule 26 of the Service Rules, Rule 11, Rule 11, Rule 11, Rule 11, Rule 26 of the Service Rules, Rule 11, Rule 24, Rule 25, Rule 25, Rule 25, Rule 25, Rule 25, Rule 25, Rule 25, Rule 32, Rule 27(2, Constitution, Constitution, Article 309 of the Constitution

PERSON: Padmanabhan, J.1, V. Ramasubramanian, M. Vijayan, knowledge.6, V. Ramaswamy, Retd, H.B. Raman, V. Ramasubramanian, Vijayan, Vijayan, Vijayan, Vijayan, Vijayan, Vijayan, Ramasubramanian, Ramasubramanian, Vijayan, Vijayan, Vijayan, Ramasubramanian, Pratap Singh v. State of, Rule 3.26(d, Vijayan, A.N. GUPTA, Vijayan, A.N. GUPTA, Ramasubramaniam, Ramasubramanian, Ramasubramanian, Bangalore, V. Ramaswamy, Bangalore, V. Ramaswamy, Enquiry Officer, Delhi Cloth, Tis Hazari, Shri S. Ravindra Bhat, Murari Lal Bikaneria, C. Bernard, Shri S. Ravindra Bhat, Enquiry Officer, Ramasubramanian, A.K. CHOPRA, Hailsham, Parma Nanda

ORDINAL: 3rd, first, first, 4th, first, fourth, third, 2nd

GPE: Ref, Fraud, T. Narasiah v., J.K. Kulkarni, Workmen, Buckingham, R.P., A.L., petitioner.33

CARDINAL: 13.7.96, 1, 2, 3.3, 31.8.95, 12.3.94, 3, 5.1, 5.5, 5.21, 4.1, 4, 5.5, 5.21, two, 29.11.94, eight, three, 23.6.95.7, 12.3.94, 21.3.94, 24.7.95, 17.8.94, 4.11.94, 31.8.95, 14.3.96, 13.7.96, 31.8.95, 31.8.95, 3, 2, 11, 31.8.95, 31.8.95, 1.2.96, 31.8.95, 12, 33, 1, 2, 3, 4)(a, 5, 5, 6, 13, 25.3, two, 31.8.95, 120, 5, 35.5, 35.5, 2, 10, three, three, 11, 18, 35.5, 20, 16, two, 26, two, 20, 26, 2, 25, 2, 2, 22.4.94, 2, 2, 2, 2, two, 62, 8), 9, 27, 3, 1, 2, 15.2, one, more than one, 28, three, 2, 30.5.96, 14.3.96, 32, 2, 2, 12, One, 1, 2, 3, 5, 17, 19, 27, 36, 7.23, two, 7.27, 7.28, 5, 3, 39, 31.8.95

DATE: 33 years, 1977, 1997, 31.8.95.15, '16, 1998, the day, August, 1958, August 4, 1958, about 8 years, '22, '26, 62, '16, annual, more than three months, '30, three months, '27, 35, twelve weeks

ORG: Hindustan Photo Films Manufacturing Company, Government of India Undertaking, Conversion Department, Company, Company, Central, GM, Employee Relations, HMT, Discipline, the Board of Directors, The Board of Directors, the Disciplinary Authority, Board, the Disciplinary Authority, the Board of Directors, Board, Discipline, Court, Board, Board, Discipline, the Apex Court, STATE BANK OF PATIALA VS, S.K. SHARMA, the Supreme Court, Apex Court, Court, the Apex Court, Court, Tribunal, Court, Court, Tribunal, Court, Tribunal, notice'/'no, Authority, Court, Tribunal, the Court/Tribunal/Authority, State, Court, Court, the Apex Court, STATE BANK OF PATIALA'S, Court, Central Bureau of Investigation, Officer/Section Officer/Sales, the Officer/Section Officer/Sales Officer, the Disciplinary Authority, Court, KHEMI RAM, the State Government, Letter Patent, High Court, State, the Division Bench, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, STATE BANK OF INDIA VS, The Supreme Court, the Andhra Pradesh High Court, the Bombay High Court, STATE BANK OF INDIA, the Apex Court, Bank, the Apex Court, the Executive Committee, the Central Board of the Bank, Bank, Bank, Bank, the High Court, Bank, Bank, Bank, the Bank as Service Rules, Bank, the Andhra Pradesh High Court, State Bank of India1, the Bombay High Court, State Bank of India, HPF Manufacturing Company, the Division Bench, the Apex Court, STATE BANK OF INDIA VS, the Disciplinary Authority, the Disciplinary Authority, the Disciplinary Authority, the Disciplinary Authority, the Disciplinary Authority, the Disciplinary Authority, illegality.23, Court, Central Public Sector Undertaking, HMT Ltd., Central Public Sector Undertaking, HMT, HMT Ltd., Central Public Sector Undertaking, HMT Ltd., Court, CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA VS, the Apex Court, General Mills Co. Ltd., Labour Court, Saran Motors, THANJAVUR TEXTILES LTD., the Apex Court, Reliance, Court, Court, Dalmia Dadri Cement Ltd., Central Bank of India, Company, Company, INDIAN TELEPHONE INDUSTRIES LTD, DEVI SHANKAR KUMAR SHUKLA, the Apex Court, Standing Order, the High Court, Enquiry Committee, the Security Department, the Standing Order, the Security Department, the Security Department, the Security Department, the High Court, the Apex Court, the Board of Directors, the Disciplinary Authority, the Disciplinary Authority, the Appellate Authority, Board, the Appellate Authority, Court, the Apex Court, UNION OF INDIA, the Apex Court, PROJECT & EQUIPMENT CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD, Court, APPAREL EXPORT PROMOTION COUNCIL VS, the Apex Court, The High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Judicial, the North Wales Police, Court, the High Court, Tribunal, Union of India, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Court, Court, the Production Department, Production Department, BC, Court, Court

WORK_OF_ART: Officers Discipline Rules, The Inquiring Officer

LOC: Single, Single, Single Judge

PRODUCT: VS, VS, VS, Rule 4.1, F

NORP: Rules, Rules

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //