M. Raghavan Vs. Asstt. Cit

Decided On : Dec-10-2003

Court : Chennai

LAW: section 50, section 32(1, section 50, section 2, the Indian Income Tax Act, Section 50, section 2(11, section 32, the Indian Income Tax Act, section 32, section 10, the Indian Income Tax Act, section 32(1, section 50, section 32(1, section 50, section 50

PERSON: R. Jayasimha Babu

GPE: J.The

DATE: 1994-95.2, between 1984 and 1988, between 1988 and 1993, the previous year, 1922, 11 of 1922, the previous year, the previous year, the previous year, 42A, more than 36 months, 12 months, 1999, the previous year, 1922, 11 of 1922, 1922, 11 of 1922, the previous year, the year, the previous year, previous year, the previous year, the previous year, the year, 48, 49, 48, 49

CARDINAL: 371, 14, 14, 1,25,000, 15,500, 1,09,500, 5,000, 1, five thousand, 5,000, 1-4-1988, 48, 49, 1, 2, 2, 2, 48 and 49, 50.11, 1-4-1988, 1, 11, 1886(2, 1886),was, 1, 2, 5,000

ORG: Tribunal, the Unit Trust of India, the Indian Income Tax Act, the Depreciation Table, Tribunal

ORDINAL: First, first

FAC: prescribed;'12

PERCENT: less than 100%, 100%