Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Tate Vs. Norton
Decided On : Jan-01-1876
Court : US Supreme Court
PERSON: Tate, Tate, Tate, SWAYNE, Joseph W. Clay, Sarah G. Clay, Joseph W. Clay, Mary S. Clay, Thomas G. Tate, Caroline Clay, Raynor W. Whitfield, Thomas Fletcher, Page, Yates v. Hambly, Kent, Mansfield, Barker v. Parker, Coleman, Knight, Earl of, Dickens 120, Markey, Langley, Oatlaw v. Yell, Gordon v. State, Baker, Brinkley v. Willis, Gould, Cossit v. Biscoe, McMorrin, Clarke, Henry Paige, Joseph W. Clay, Payne, Baker, Brinkley v. Willis, Tate, Ford, Stewart, Johns, Morgan, Griffin, Cowan, Ann, Scott v. McDougall
ORG: Norton, U.S. Supreme Court, Norton, Norton, ARKANSAS, Syllabus, Court, State, Sweeney, Greene, & Co., Norton, & Co., Hewitt & Co., Court, Hook v. Payne, Thompson v. Brown, Johns, Thompson v. Brown, Montague on Partnership 187, Sayer v. Bennet, Beav, Thompson v. Brown, apparentibus, sec, sec, sec, sec, Dooley, Sweeney, Greene, & Co., sec, Dennison v. Duplissis
GPE: U.S., U.S., U.S., Arkansas, County, Arkansas, Arkansas, Texas, Hewitt, s.c., N.Y., Wedderburne, Hardwicke, Plymouth, Arkansas, Ark., Ark., Shelton, Ark., N.Y., New Orleans, Louisiana
DATE: 1876, 1876, May, 1853, July, 1853, 1855, three years, 1855, the last in 1870, the year 1858, the year 1863, annually, several years, 84, any quarter, c. 4, 1848, c. 4, c. 4, c. 4, 2233
CARDINAL: 94, 94, 1, 2, 3, three, four, one-third, one-third, one-third, five, 7, 425, 363, 2, 263, 4, 631, 1, 22, 439, 480, 5, 473, 11, 12, 21, 405, 22, 6, 115, 12, 95, 14, 244, 62, 122, 96, 111, 16, 480, 14, 124, 21, 405, 22, 6, 19, 344, 15, 488, 14, 310, 12
MONEY: 129,445.54, 113,400, 16,045.54, 103,436.62, more than $113,000
ORDINAL: first
NORP: d., d., d., d., d., d., d., d., d.
PERCENT: 92 U. S.
WORK_OF_ART: La. 9