Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Tate Vs. Norton

Decided On : Jan-01-1876

Court : US Supreme Court

PERSON: Tate, Tate, Tate, SWAYNE, Joseph W. Clay, Sarah G. Clay, Joseph W. Clay, Mary S. Clay, Thomas G. Tate, Caroline Clay, Raynor W. Whitfield, Thomas Fletcher, Page, Yates v. Hambly, Kent, Mansfield, Barker v. Parker, Coleman, Knight, Earl of, Dickens 120, Markey, Langley, Oatlaw v. Yell, Gordon v. State, Baker, Brinkley v. Willis, Gould, Cossit v. Biscoe, McMorrin, Clarke, Henry Paige, Joseph W. Clay, Payne, Baker, Brinkley v. Willis, Tate, Ford, Stewart, Johns, Morgan, Griffin, Cowan, Ann, Scott v. McDougall

ORG: Norton, U.S. Supreme Court, Norton, Norton, ARKANSAS, Syllabus, Court, State, Sweeney, Greene, & Co., Norton, & Co., Hewitt & Co., Court, Hook v. Payne, Thompson v. Brown, Johns, Thompson v. Brown, Montague on Partnership 187, Sayer v. Bennet, Beav, Thompson v. Brown, apparentibus, sec, sec, sec, sec, Dooley, Sweeney, Greene, & Co., sec, Dennison v. Duplissis

GPE: U.S., U.S., U.S., Arkansas, County, Arkansas, Arkansas, Texas, Hewitt, s.c., N.Y., Wedderburne, Hardwicke, Plymouth, Arkansas, Ark., Ark., Shelton, Ark., N.Y., New Orleans, Louisiana

DATE: 1876, 1876, May, 1853, July, 1853, 1855, three years, 1855, the last in 1870, the year 1858, the year 1863, annually, several years, 84, any quarter, c. 4, 1848, c. 4, c. 4, c. 4, 2233

CARDINAL: 94, 94, 1, 2, 3, three, four, one-third, one-third, one-third, five, 7, 425, 363, 2, 263, 4, 631, 1, 22, 439, 480, 5, 473, 11, 12, 21, 405, 22, 6, 115, 12, 95, 14, 244, 62, 122, 96, 111, 16, 480, 14, 124, 21, 405, 22, 6, 19, 344, 15, 488, 14, 310, 12

MONEY: 129,445.54, 113,400, 16,045.54, 103,436.62, more than $113,000

ORDINAL: first

NORP: d., d., d., d., d., d., d., d., d.

PERCENT: 92 U. S.

WORK_OF_ART: La. 9

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //