Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Parthasarathy N. Vs. Blue Star Limited and anr.

Decided On : Jan-09-2009

Court : Chennai

LAW: the Industrial Disputes Act, the Industrial Disputes Act, the Industrial Disputes Act, the Industrial Disputes Act and Rule 65, the Industrial Disputes Act, the Industrial Disputes Act, Rule 65, the Industrial Disputes Act, Section 33, the Industrial Disputes Act or Rule 65, Section 33, Rule 65, Section 33, the Industrial Disputes Act, Section 33, Section 33, the Industrial Disputes Act, Rule 65, Section 33, Section, Section 33, Section 33(3, Section 33(3, the Industrial Disputes Act, Rule 66, Section 33-A, Rule 66, Section 33, Section 33(4, Section 33(4, the Industrial Disputes Act, Section 33-A, Section 33-A of the Act, Section 33 of the Act, Rule 62, Section 33(3, Rule 65, Rule 65, Section 33 of the Act, the Industrial Disputes Act, Section 33(4, the Industrial Disputes Act and Rule 65, Rule 65, the Industrial Disputes Act, Section 22, Section 67(1)(d, Section 33 of the Act, Section 33(3, Section 33(3, Rule 65, Section 33, Section 33, the Industrial Disputes Act

PERSON: K. Raviraja Pandian, S. Manikumar, Madras, Gulwadi, Sankaran, Enquiry Officer, N.G.R. Prasad, Thiru, G. Lakshmanan, Counsel, Thiru G. Lakshmanan, Management Witness, Lakshmidevamma, Madras, Counsel, S. Ravindran, Thiru G. Lakshmanan, Thiru, G. Subramani, G. Lakshmanan, G. Lakshmanan, Anna Salai, Thiru, G. Lakshmanan, Thiru, G. Lakshmanan, P.H. Kalyani, Addl, Addl, I.T., Tamil Nadu, S. Ravindran, Madras, Lakshmidevamma, P.H. Kalyani, Treasurer, Addl, P.H. Kalyani, P.H. Kalyani, Bangalore, Radcliffe, Anwar Hasan Khan v. Mohd, Labour Officer, Exhibit W-2, T. Ramamoorthy v., Sri Ramakrishna Vidyalaya High School, Sube Singh, T. Ramamoorthy v., Sri Ramakrishna Vidyalaya High School, Sube Singh, Anjum Ghaswala, Ambay Cements, Tamil Nadu Industrial Disputes Rules, P.H. Kalyani, M.Ws.1, Thiru, G. Lakshmanan, Anna Salai, Thiru, Lakshmanan, Nayak v. Goa University, Bias, Girija Shankar Pant, Bias, 5th Ed, justice.52, Lakshmidevamma, Rajendra Jha v. Presiding Officer, Bench

ORG: Blue Star Ltd., W.P. No, the Writ Court, the Industrial Tribunal, Tribunal, the Tamil Nadu Industrial Dispute Rules, Memo, Tribunal, Office, the Trade Union, the Approval Petition, the Trade Union, Management Witnesses, the Charge Memo, the Management Witnesses, Management, the Approval Petition, the Industrial Tribunal, the Competent authority, Tribunal, the Management Witnesses, Tribunal, Management, the Management Witnesses, Management, the Industrial Tribunal, the Trade Union under Section 65(2, the Tamil Nadu Industrial Dispute Rules, the Industrial Tribunal, Tribunal, the Writ Court, the Industrial Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Industrial Tribunal, Court, Court, Management, Learned Counsel, Learned Counsel, the Management Representative, the Management Witnesses, Learned Counsel, Learned Counsel, the Industrial Tribunal, Court, Industrial Tribunal, LLN, the Industrial Tribunal, Learned Counsel, the Gujarat High Court, the Industrial Disputes (Bombay) Rules, the Supreme Court, Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation, AIR 2001, the Court/Tribunal, Management, the Industrial Tribunal, the Industrial Tribunal, Justice, Thiru, Thiru, Tribunal, the Approval Petition under Section 33(2)(b, Counsel for the Management, Trade Union, the Trade Union, Air France, Calcutta, Canara Workshops Ltd., LLN, Union v. T.N.C.S. Corporation Ltd., the Industrial Disputes (Karnataka) Rules, Canara Workshops Ltd., Protected Workmen, the Industrial Tribunal, Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation, the Court/Tribunal, Learned Counsel, Industrial Tribunal, the Industrial Tribunal, Tribunal, Union, the Blue Star Employees: Union, the Trade Union's, the Tamil Nadu Industrial Tribunal Rules, Air France, Calcutta, the Supreme Court, the Labour Court, the Supreme Court, the Labour Court, the Industrial Tribunal, Tribunal, the Carborundum Universal Union, Office, Union, the Office Bearers, Tribunal, the Trade Union, the Trade Union, Office, the Gujarat High Court, Canara Workshops Ltd., I.T., the Canara Workshops Limited, the Industrial Tribunal under Section 33(2)(b, Tribunal, Tribunal, the High Court, the Trade Union, the Supreme Court, Air France, Calcutta, Court, Union v. T.N.C.S. Corporation Ltd., Union, the Supreme Court, Air France, Calcutta, Court, Statute, the Trade Union, Trade Union, Labour, the Central Sales Tax Act, the Supreme Court, Consolidated Coffee Ltd., Coffee Board, AIR 1980, Legislature, Legislature, Court, Court, AIR 2001, the Supreme Court, the Tamil Nadu Industrial Disputes Rules, Labour, Labour, Union, Union, the Tamil Nadu Industrial Disputes Rules 1958, Labour, Tribunal, Management, Labour, Union, Labour, the Tamil Nadu Industrial Disputes Rules.41, the Trade Union, the Trade Union, Ors, AIR 2004, AIR 2005, SC, Act.43, the Supreme Court, Court, the State Government, The Supreme Court, State, the Tamil Nadu Industrial Tribunal Rules, the Trade Unions, the Trade Union, the Trade Union, Supreme Court, Court, Management, Union as Protected Workmen, the Apex Court, Air France, Calcutta, Management, Management, the Mount Road Office, Blue Star Limited, Office Furniture, the Supreme Court, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, The Supreme Court, Kumaon Mandal Vikas Nigam Ltd., AIR 2001, SC, Stroud'S Judicial Dictionary, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Writ Court, Tribunal, the Labour Court/Tribunal, the Supreme Court, Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation, Shambhu Nath Goyal v. Bank of Baroda, Labour Court, AIR 1984, the Supreme Court, Labour Courts/Tribunals, the Court/Tribunal, the Court/Tribunal, the Industrial Tribunal, the Supreme Court, the Industrial Tribunal, Tribunal

DATE: 14421/1997, August 24, 2006, February 24, 1997, 1958, March 20, 1989, February 22, 1990, March 23, 1989 and, March 26, 1990, March 23, 1989, January 21,1991, May 9, 1991, 1947, the year 1990-91, 1947, June 26, 1990, March 23, 1989, April 17, 1990, April 20, 1990, 14421/1997, April 20, 1990, November 20, 1988, the year 1990-91, 1958, 1958, February 24, 1997, July 17, 1989, April 3, 1990, April 3, 1990, April 6,1990, April 16, 1990, the next day, day, April 10, 1990, April 16, 1990, April 16,1990, a days adjournment.10, one day, April 17, 1990, April 17, 1990, 2003, 1102, Tactual, February 24, 1997, November 20, 1988, the year 1990, the successive years, 1978, 2001, April 30, 1991, nearly five years, July 17, 1989 ended on, April 20,1990, July 17, 1989, August 9, 1989, December 1, 1989, April 3, 1990, April 6, 1990, April 6, 1990, April 10, 1990, April 16, 1990, the enquiry to April 20, 4990, April 20,1990, April 17,1990, 1958, 30th September of every year, 15 days, '18, 60 days, 1963, 1963, 1986, 1998, 1957, September 20,1996, April 17,1990, 1958, the 30th September of every year, fifteen days, the 30th September of an year, fifteen days, five days, September 26, 1990, the year 1991, September 26, 1990, 15 days, the year 1991, 1958, the 30th September of every year, fifteen days, fifteen days, the previous year, December 23, 1971, the year, September 30, 1972, September 25, 1972, 1957, September 29, 1972, 15 days, September 22, 1972, November 28, 1972, September 25, 1972, November 25, 1972, 30th September, 15 days, Section 33(4, Section 33(4, 15 days, '30, 1947, 1951, fifteen days, the sixteenth day, fifteen days, fifteen days, 1958, 1468, 1980, 2001, 8, a period of, six months, the 30th September of the year, the year, June 26, 1990, Rule 65, '39, November 23, 1988, the year 1990, 15 days, 15 days, 1998, 2004, 27, September of every year, 15 days, 15 days, 15 days, July 17, 1989, February 20, 1990, November 13, 1989, 5, July 28, 1989, December 1, 1989, February 7, 1989, January 3, 1990, January 31, 1990, February 1, 1990, February, that day, February 20, 1990, that day, the same to April 3, 1990, April 3, 1990, the enquiry to April 6, April 10,1990, April 10, 1990, April 16, 1996, April 16, 1990, April 20, 1990, April 17, 1990, a day, April 16, 1990, July 17, 1989, April 17, 1990, 2002, 33, 2001, 2001, April 17, 1990, 1984, 1983, 1983-II-LLJ-415, 1984, April 30, 1991, September 30, 1996

WORK_OF_ART: Approval Petition No, a Writ Petition, Protected Workmen', Supp SCC

NORP: Mechanic, R., Balasubramanian, R., Balasubramanian, R., Balasubramanian, Statute, Rules

ORDINAL: first, second, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, second

CARDINAL: two, two, five, 61/1991, three, 4, 4, 4, 4, 3, 17, 1, 4, 1957.14, 5, 433, 61/1991, one, one, more than one, 18, 4, 4, 25, 25, 1, 61/1991, 54/1996, 4, 2, 3, 4, 2, 3, five, one hundred, 65, 4, 3, 1, 4, more than one, five, five, 2, 4, 3, 1, two, 3, 1).27, three, three, five, five, one, five, three, five, five, 2, 4, five, one hundred, more than one, 3, 8, one, one, 1, one, five, 5, 6, 4168.42, 18, five, five, 990, 4, 4, one, 790, 2, 1, 182, 5869, 3, 289, 4, 491, 520, Five, 54/1996

FAC: the Enquiry Officer, the Enquiry Officer, the Tamil Nadu Industrial Dispute Rules, Anna Salai, Mount Road, the Tamil Nadu Industrial Tribunal Rules, the Tamil Nadu Industrial Tribunal Rules, the Tamil Nadu Industrial Dispute Rules, the Tamil Nadu Industrial Dispute Rules.20, Submitted, the Tamil Nadu Industrial Disputes Rules, Paragraph 12, the Tamil Nadu Industrial Disputes Rules, the Tamil Nadu Industrial Disputes Rules, Paragraph 29, Mount Road, Mount Road Officer, Paragraph 45

GPE: I.D., Counsel, I.D., M.Ws.2, M.Ws.2, M.Ws.2, M.Ws.2, P.O., Counsel, Counsel, Counsel, M.Ws.2, M.Ws.2, I.T., T.N.C.S., Counsel, Counsel, record.22, St. Aubyn, Delhi, Jharkhand, Delhi, Karnataka, Jharkhand, M.Ws.2, Counsel, M.Ws.2, G.N., parte.53, justice.54

LOC: Madras

MONEY: 2001-II, one per cent, one per cent

EVENT: evidence.17, SC 2984

PRODUCT: 825, Act.32, Dhanajaya

TIME: the morning

LANGUAGE: English

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //