Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., Rep. by Its Senior Regional Manager Vs. Spencer and Company Ltd.

Decided On : Oct-15-2003

Court : Chennai

LAW: Section 9 of the City Tenants Protection Act, Section 9 of the City Tenants Protection, Section 9, Section 9 of the City Tenants Protection Act, Section 9, Section 2(4)(ii, Section 2(4)(i, Section 2(4)(i, Section 2(4)(i, Section 2(4)(i, Section 2(4)(i, Section 2(4)(i, section 2(4)(i, Section 9, Section 9, Section 2(4)(ii, Section 9, the Tenants Protection Act, Section 9, Section 9, Section 9, Section 3;iii, Section 3 of the Act, Section 3, Section 3, Section 9, Section 9 of the Act, the Hindu Succession Act, Section 14, Section 9, Section 9, Section 3 of the Act, Section 3 of the Act, Section 3 of the Act, Section 9 of the Act, Section 9, Section 9, Section 9, Section 9, Section 9, Section 9, Section 9 of the City Tenants Protection

PERSON: Ashok Kumar, J.1, Chennai, Caltex, Sekara Bhoopathy v. Navaneethammal, Pillai, Mohd, M.L.J. 319, Hamasa Patel, S. Balakrishnan, Easwara Vadivammal, Sec.9, Neelamegam, Matada Kotturuswami, P. Ananthakrishnan Nair, G. Ramakrishnan, P. Ananthakrishnan's, Pillai, Mohd, Neelamegam

ORG: This Civil Revision Petition, VI Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai, VI, City Civil Court, Chennai, Spencer & Co Limited, Court, VI, City Civil Court, VI Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai, VI, this Civil Revision Petition, Caltex (India) Ltd., the Central Government, Caltex (India) Ltd., Corporation, Central Government Enterprise, the City Tenants Protection Act, the City Tenants Protection Act.7, the City Tenants Protection Act, Court, the Supreme Court, Court, the Tamil Nadu City Tenants' Protection Act, Court, Court, Act, the Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, Court, the City Tenants Protection Act, Court, the Tamil Nadu City Tenants Protection Act, Court, the Supreme Court, the Tamil Nadu City Tenants' Protection Act 1921, Learned Counsel, Court, Court, Court, the Bon Service Et Lubritection, Bon Service Et Lubritection, Bon Service Et Lubritection, Bon Service Et Lubritection, Bon Service Et Lubritection, Bon Service Et Lubritection, the Supreme Court, this Civil Revision Petition, C.M.P. No

CARDINAL: 188, 2, 1,06,000/-, 01.06.1980 to 30.09.1980, one, one, 31.12.1979, 6., 31.12.1979, one, 2, one, 2(4)(ii, 19.07.1996, 982, 575, two, 1, 2, 1, 2, 2, 5, 6., 1, 968, 2, one

DATE: 2000, 1996, 26,250/- per month, 1997, 17.04.1979, 10.07.1981, 1983, 1995, 1995, 2000, 6, 12, 13, 14, '5, one month, 1958, 1956, Section 14(1, 1987]2SCR734, 1983, 1979, the year 1981, 2001

GPE: I.A., I.A., I.A., C.M.A., S.A., C.M.A., Radhakrishnan, S.R., Gummalapura, Estate, Radhakrishnan, S.R.

ORDINAL: 01.01.1995, first, fifth, fifth, first

PRODUCT: Setra Veeravva

NORP: Hindu

EVENT: the Tamil Nadu Act

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //