Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

G.K. Steels (Coimbatore) Ltd. Rep. by Its Director Vs. the Commissioner of Central Excise and the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise, Coimbatore Ii Division

Decided On : Nov-20-2008

Court : Chennai

LAW: Chapter Heading, the Central Excise Rules, the Finance Act 21, Section 88, Section 88.2, Section 95(ii)(c, the Finance Act, Section 95(ii)(c, Section 95(ii)(b, Section 95, Section 95(ii)(c, Section 95(ii)(b, the Finance Act 21

PERSON: Chandru, J.1, Jenasenan, Ravichandrababu, Jenasenan, Ravichandrababu

CARDINAL: 72, 29,01,015/-, 3., 30.07.1999, 10.5, 4, 29, 14.5, 4., 2003]263ITR763(SC, 14, 31-3-1998, 5.

DATE: 1985, 1998, 1998, 16.09.1997, 1998, 1998, a period of, eight weeks

ORG: the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, the Supreme Court, the Central Government, the Central Government, KVSS, Court/Appellate Forum or Authority, Court, Central Government Standing, Court, Central Government Standing Counsel, Lajya Dyeing & Bleaching Works v. Union of India and Ors, the Supreme Court, the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, Scheme, the High Court, the Supreme Court, the Central Government, Scheme, the Supreme Court, him.6, the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme

ORDINAL: first, first

PERCENT: 50%, 50%

GPE: Counsel, Paragraph No

PRODUCT: KVSS, Judgment

WORK_OF_ART: a Judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //