T. Venkateswaran Vs. Muthuraj and ors.

Decided On : Nov-03-2008

Court : Chennai

LAW: Section 2(d, Constitution, Section 36(2, Section 36(2, Article 32 of the Constitution, Section 36(2, Article 32 of the Constitution, Article 32, Section 36(2, Section 13, the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 20 of the Act, Section 20., Section 20, Section 20, Section 20, Section 20, Section 15, Section 20, Section 20, Article 215 of the Constitution, Section 20, Article 215, Constitution, Section 20, Section 15, Section 36(2

ORG: A.K. Ganguly, petitioner.2, the Tamil Nadu State Human Rights Commission, the 'Commission', M.M.Rangaswamy of Lakshmi Gold Bankers, Commission, Commission, Commission, this Hon'ble Court, The Protection of Human Rights Act, Commission, the State Commission, the Supreme Court, Commission, Commission, Court, Statement of Objects, Statement of Objects, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, the General Assembly of United Nations, National Charter, The Preamble of the, State Human Rights Commissions, States and Human Rights Courts, the Statement of Objects, the Preamble of the, the International Covenants, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, the Supreme Court, Judges of, the Supreme Court, Commission, CBI, Act the Commission, Commission, Commission, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Commission, the Supreme Court, the National Human Rights Commission, the Supreme Court, the National Human Rights Commission, Commission, the Supreme Court, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Commission, Commission, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Commission, Counsel, the Supreme Court, Dhoundial, Ashok Kumar Sinha, the National Human Rights Commission, Judges of, the Supreme Court, Section 36(2, Commission, Dhoundial, Dhoundial, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Commission, Commission, Commission, Act the Commission, Commission, the Civil Court, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Court, Commission, Court, Court, Crawford on Statutory Construction, Contempt of Courts Act, Contempt of Courts Act, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, D.K. Mittal, Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Advocate-General, the High Court, the Contempt of Courts Act, the Human Rights Commission, Commission, Court, Commission, Commission, Commission, Court, the Contempt of Courts Act, the State Commission, Commission, Commission

ORDINAL: second, first, first, first, first

CARDINAL: 01.07.2002, one, 01.07.2002, 3., 2, 5., 6, two, 11, 12, 13, one, 25.3.1994, 3.4.1994, 3.4.1994, 14, 15, one, 16, 17, 299-300, 299, 2000CriLJ1700, 20, three, 779, 22, 779, 1971.22, 23

DATE: 28.02.2002, one year, 16.4.2003, 13.05.2003, 13.05.2003, 16th July, 2003, 1995, one year, 1999CriLJ456, one year, one year, the period of one year, 16th December, 1966, 16.4.2003, 13.05.2003. 10, 1999CriLJ456, one year, more than four years, 19.8.1998, almost four years four months, more than four years, 17 that one year, 03.04.1995, one year, about four months, four months, one year, 1940, 1971, 1971, one year, 2001 5, 42, one year, 1971, one year, 1971, paragraph-40, four months

PERSON: Kaur, Raja Kalifulla, Government Pleader, Pleader, Reasons, Reasons, Reasons, Kaur, Kaur, Thomas Law Book Company, Bench, Sheth v. Custodian and, Pallav Seth

GPE: India, N.C., Counsel, N.C., Saint Louis, Pallav

NORP: Punjab, Mandamus

PRODUCT: intent18

LOC: Om Prakash Jaiswal, Prakash Jaiswal, Prakash Jaiswal