Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

K.V. Shanmugam Vs. State of Tamil Nadu Represented by Secretary to Government, Industries Department and ors.

Decided On : Apr-30-1997

Court : Chennai

LAW: Rule 39, Section 2, Rule 39, Section 2, the Forest Conservation Act, the Forest Conservation Act, Rule 39, Forest Conservation Act, Rule 39, the Forest Conservation Act, Section 2 of Forest Conservation Act, Section 2, Section 2, Section 2, Rule 39, Section 2, Section 2, Rule 39, Section 2, Section 2 of the Act, Section 2 (ii, Section 3-A of the Act, Section 2 of the Act, Section 2 (ii, Section 3-A of the Act, Section 2 (ii, the Division Bench, the Forest Conservation Act, Section 8, Central Act XXXVII, Section 2, Section 2 of Act LXIX, Section 2 of Act LXIX, Section 8 of the Act, Central Act XXXVII, Rule 24-A of the Rules, Section 2 of Act LXIX, Rule 24-A, Section 8 of the Act, Section 2, Section 2 (ii, Section 2 (ii, Section 2 (ii, Rule 39, Rule 39, Rule 39, Section 2, Section 2 of Forest (Conservation) Act

NORP: J.1, Gujarat

DATE: 1995, 12.12.1974, a period of, two years, 21.3.1977, five years, 10 years, years, 1982, 11739, 1987, 2.9.1989, 1959, 10 years, 1980, 1980, 28.12.1994, 1981, 1996, 19.5.1995, 1995, 1995, 1995, 1980, 5.5.1995, 5.5.1995, 1959, 1980, 1959, 1995, 1995, 1995, 1959, 1980, 1980, 1980, 1980, 8505 of 1995,, 18513 of 1996, 1995, 1995, 1995, 1995, 1995, 1995, 1995, 1995, 1995, 1995, 1995, 1995, 1995, 18513 of 1996, 1995, 1980, 1988, 1996, 1995, 1997, 38916, 1995, 1995, 1996, 1980, 1990, 1996]1SCR302 18, 1980, 1959, ten years, 1980, 1980, 1989, 1995, 1980, 1996, 1980, 1980, 1986, 1980, 1980, 1980, 1986, 1980, 1980, 1990, 1989, 1994, 1980, 1995, 1980, 18.1.1993, 18.1.1993, 1994, 1994, 1995, 5.5.1995, 1980, 14359 of 1996

ORG: Court, E2) Department, Badanavadi Reserve Forest, Badanavadi Reserve Forest, Industries Department, W.P. No, Court, G.O. 1273 Industries Department, Government Poramboke, the State of Tamil Nadu, the State of Tamil Nadu, G.O. 608 Industries, the Tamil Nadu Minor, Mineral Concession Rules, Parliament, the Central Government, The District Forest, the Central Government, the Central Government, the State Government, the Central Government, Court, W.P., Badavadi Revenue Forest, the Sub Registrar's Office, Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly, the General Secretaries, the Tamil Nadu Congress Committee, the Government of Tamil Nadu, the State Government, the Government of Tamil Nadu, The Central Government, the State Government, Order, Industries Department, Court, E2) Department, Mineral Concession Rules, the District Forest Officer, Court, Golden Granites, Golden Granites, Government of India, Ministry of Environment and Forests, the Government of India, the Reserved Forest, W.P. No, K.V. Shanmugam, W.P., Government, Minor Minerals, Central Government, Central Government, Union of India, the Central Government, the Forest (Conservation) Act, the Forest (Conservation) Act, W.P. No, W.P. No, W.P. No, Additional Government Pleader, W.P. No, Court, Ponnusamy, Legis-lative Assembly, the General Secretaries, Tamil Nadu Congress Committee, V.T. Gopalan, W.P. No, Reserved Forest, the Government of Tamil Nadu, Pennagram, the Central Government, the Central Government, the State Government, Government of India, Ministry of Environment and Forest, Tirumulkpad v. Union of India, AIR1997SC1228, Rural Litigation, The District Forest Officer, Nilgiris North Division, Uthagamandalam, N.R.C. 43);(v, Supp, W.P. No, W.P. No, Government, the Central Government, Hyderabad Abrasive and Minerals, Hyderabad, F.B., Additional Government Pleader, the State Government, the Central Government, State, no State Government, the Central Government, State, Government of India, Ministry of Environment and Forest, Badanavadi Reserve Forest, Government Reserve, the District Collector, the High Level Committee, The Government of Tamil Nadu, State Government, the Central Government, the State Government, the Central Government, the State Government, the Forest (Conservation) Act, no State Government, the Central Government, Nonforest, the Central Government, Gujarat Pottery Works, the Apex Court, The Supreme Court, Rural Litigation, U.P., Supp, Supp, the Central Government, the Forest (Conservation) Act, the Division Bench, Court, The District Forest Officer, Nilgiris North Division, Uthagamandalam, Court, State Government, the Central Government, State, State, the Central Government, the Central Government, the state Government, the Central Government, the State Government, Patna High Court, the Andhra Pradesh High Court, Minerals v. Government of A.P., A.W., the State Government, the Central Government, the Supreme Court, the Andhra Pradesh High Court, the Andhra Pradesh High Court, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, State of Bihar v. Bandhi Ram, U.P., Supp, the Andhra Pradesh High Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, T. N:, AIR1997SC1228, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, State of Bihar v., Central Government, the Supreme Court, Court, the Forest (Conservation) Act, the Supreme Court, the Andhra Pradesh High Court, the Central Government, the Apex Court, Union of India, W.P. No, the Central Government, the Forest (Conservation) Act, Court, the Public Trust Doctrine, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Doctrine of Public Trust, State, State, the Pub-lic Trust, AIR1997SC1228, K.V. Narayanasamy, C.M.P., Court, Additional Government Pleader, Government, the Forest Department, the Central Government, the Apex Court, E2) Department

ORDINAL: first, second, second, first, fourth, first, fifth, second, third, 1st, third, first, first, fifth, fifth, first, first, fifth, fifth, third, first, third, second, third, third, third, second, 5th, third, third, first, first, 2nd, 5th, third, first, fifth, fifth, first, fifth, fifth, 5th, first, fifth, fifth, first, first, fifth, fifth, fifth, fifth, 5th

CARDINAL: 119, 5.5.1995, 1, 4, 5, 9.5.1994.3, 382, 29.12.1978, 5.5.1995, 662, 119, 119, 9.5.1994, 1980.9, two, 1, 4, 1, 2, 1996.14, 1, 4, five, 263, 1, 587, 1, 1995.17, 1, One, 7, 5, 1967]1SCR695, 2, 1, 504, 3, 1, 587, 34, 255/3, 6, 27.9.1993, 6, 1, 240, 1, 504, 5, 5, 1997)1SCC388, 1997)1SCC388, 9.9.1994, 9.9.1994, 9.5.1994, 39, 9.3.1994, 18.1.93, 5, 316, 119

QUANTITY: 18.60 acres, 18-60 acres, 5.50 acres, 6.6 acres, 6.60 acres, 6.60 acres, 18.60 acres

PERSON: Pennagaram Taluk, Sunjalnatham, Order, Golden Granite, Tamil Nadu Mines, Tamil Nadu, Tamil Nadu, V.T. Gopalan, V. Selvaraj, N.R. Chandran, R. Krishnamoorthy, Dharmapuri Constitu-ency, Golden Granites Limited, W. Ps, T.L. Godavaran, Entitlement Kendra v. State, Upendra Jha v. State of, Mohamed Hussain, Krishandas Tikaram, S.C.C., M.C. Mehta, Kalanath, V. Selvaraj, Counsel, R. Krishnamoorthy, N.R. Chandran, Golden Granites Limited, Sri M. KG, Subrahmanyam, V.T., Tamil Nadu, Madras, Order, V.T. Gopalan, Order, B.P. Sol, Quarry Works, Entitlement Kendra v. State, S.C.C., Madhya Pradesh, Krishnadas Tikaram, S.C.C., Mohamed Hussain, S. Nos, LXIX, Upendra Jha v. State, Quarry Works, Rural Liti-gation, Entitlement Kendra v. State, S.C.C., Godavarman Thirumulapad v. Union, Banshi Ram Modi, 17.3.1995, V.T. Gopalan, M.C. Mehta, Kalnath, T.N. Godavarman Thirumulkpad v. Union of India, M.C. Mehta's, Order, Order

GPE: Dharmapuri, Dharmapuri, Dharmapuri, Dharmapuri District, Dharmapuri, New Delhi, Dharmapuri, New Delhi, decisions:(i, New Delhi, Pennagaram Taluk, Dharmapuri District, Dharmapuri, Ambica, Counsel, English United States, C.M.A., C.M.A., C.M.A., order.27

FAC: the Tamil Nadu Minor Mineral Concession Rules, Managing Partners, Hyderabad Abrasives

WORK_OF_ART: Forest (Conservation) Act

LOC: W.P. Nos, W.P. 8845 of 1995, W.P. 8505 of, the District For-est Officer

PRODUCT: Black Gran, Compliance, the Full Bench of

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //