Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Eximel India Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Decided On : Mar-09-1998

Court : Chennai

LAW: the Bill of Entry/Rotation No, the Bill of Entry/Rotation No. 900/88, Section 25, the Customs Act, List 2 Appendix 6, Section 25, the Customs Act, the Bill of Entry/Rotation No. 900/88, Section 3, the Customs Tariff Act

GPE: Gnanaprakasam, valorem, Headings, Bombay, Sl

NORP: J.1

ORDINAL: third

CARDINAL: 28-10-1988, 208, 87/88., 2., 1,10,000, 220, 28-10-1988, 208, 8, 1991.4, 208, 1, 182, 44, 11-3-1987, 1168/87, 6-10-1987, 208/81, 22, 208/81, 8, 28-10-1988, 22, 22, 21959

ORG: Exemption Notification No, Government Hospitals, JMS' Brand, M.V. Indian Courier, Customs Notification No, the Customs Authorities, Additional Duty, Open General Licence, Import and Export Policy, Import and Export Policy, the Government of India, the Department of Revenue, the Collector of Customs (Appeals, the Collector of Customs, the Bills of Entry, the Customs Department, Customs, the Import and Export Policy, The Learned Advocate, The 'Infusion Sets', this Honourable Court, W.M.P, Bank

DATE: 1981, 1981, 1988-91, 1962, April, 1988 to March, 1981, 1962, 52 of 1962, 2nd August, 1976, April, 1988 to March, 1991, 44, 1975, 1988

PERCENT: 40%, 45%, 15%, 100%, 40%, 45%, 40%, 45%, 15%

FAC: Intravenous Transfusion, Intravenous Transfusion

PERSON: Terminol, Schedule

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //