Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Donnington Tea Factory and ors. Vs. Sub-divisional Magistrate and

Decided On : Jun-18-1998

Court : Chennai

LAW: Section 133(1)(b)(ii, Section 133, Section 133(1)(b)(ii, Section 133 ', Section 133, Section 133 of the Code, Section 133, the Food Adulteration Act

ORG: ORDERM, the Sub-Divisional Magistrate-cum Sub-Collector, Coonoor, Public, the Nilgiris Agricultural Labourers Welfare Association, Small and Young Tea Growers Association, Consumers Protection Council, Kotagiri Taluk, Ministers of Central, the Court of Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Coonoor, the Bombay High Court, Tajmal, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, nuisances.10, Court, Court, the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act

PERSON: Karpagavinayagam, N.T. Vanamamalai, Tamil, N.T. Vanamamalai, Cr, Murlidhar v. Onkar, Sohan Lal v., Mohan Lal, Shaukat Hussain v. Sheodayal, Cri LJ):-An, Cri LJ

NORP: J.1, P.M.

CARDINAL: 10-10-1995, 3.00, 16, 1, three, 643

GPE: Cr, Kotagiri, Burad v. State

WORK_OF_ART: English News

DATE: seven days, this 10th day of, October 1995.4, 1355, 1321

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //