Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Sardarmal Kothari

Decided On : Jun-17-2008

Court : Chennai

LAW: Section 54F, Section 54F, the IT Act, Section 54F, Section 54F, the IT Act, ITD 94, Section 54F

PERSON: K. Raviraja Pandian, Shri Sardarmal, Kothari, Seetha Subramanian v. Asstt, D.P. Mehta

NORP: J.1

DATE: 2001-02, Oct., 1993, three years, 12th July, 2003, 30th Jan., 2004, Oct., 1993 (, 1993, 1996, 1996

CARDINAL: 3,02,593, 25,000, 1, 667, one, 667, 115, 1, 56, 417, 59, 2001]251ITR529(Delhi

ORG: AO, AO, Department, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, valid2, Tribunal, the Board Circular No, AO, Tribunal, the Board Circular No, CTR, Tribunal, CIT, TTJ, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Delhi High Court, CIT, Tribunal

ORDINAL: 18th, second, 18th

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //