Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

K. Arunachalam and ors. Vs. the District Collector and ors.

Decided On : Oct-17-1995

Court : Chennai

LAW: Article 141 of the Constitution of India, Article 141 of the Constitution of India, Article 141 of the Constitution of India.12, Section 7, the Karnataka Act 10 of 1984, Act 21, the Entry Tax Act, Section 3 of Act 10 of 1981, Article 141 of the Constitution, Article 32, Article 226, Constitution, Constitution, Article 32 or, Article 226, Article 32, Article 141, Article 226 of the Constitution, Article 141 of the Constitution of India, Article 141 of the Constitution of India, Article 141 of the Constitution be, Article 141 of the Constitution, the Central Act I, Section 4(1, Tamil Nadu Act 31 of

GPE: ORDERAR, Lakshmanan, Komarapalayam Amani Village, Komarapalayam Amani Village, Padaveedu Village, Sankari, Sankari, Roc, Sankari, Thattankuttai, Komarapalayam Amani Village, Sankari, Sankari, Roc, Sankari, Counsel, Sankari, India, P.D., Karnataka, Karnataka, Karnataka v. Hansa Corporation, Karnataka, Karnataka v. Hansa Corporation, Karnataka, Jammu, Kashmir State, Karnataka, India, Daryao, India, India, Jashbai, A.I.R., Jasbhai, India, India

NORP: J.1

DATE: 13786 of 1995, 1981, 13787 of 1995, 1981, 13830 of 1995, 1981, 9486, 9487 of 1981, 1.10.1981, 1978, 1980, 1981, 13830 of 1995, 1980, 9.9.1981, 13786, 1995, 1978, 30.3.1981, 3978, 26.9.1995, 1995, 10.10.1995, 12.10.1995, 13786, 13830 of 1995, 1978, 1981, 1978, 9.9.1981, 1980, 9486, 9487, 1981, 18.9.1981, 1982, 1590, 1980, 1979, 25.9.1980, 1980, 1980, 1980, 1980, 1981, 1980, 1981, 1981, 1980, 1981, 1981, 1.10.1980, 1979, 1987, 15.5.1986, 18.4.1985, a particular year, a subsequent year, year, a given year, a particular year, 1960, a particular year, a subsequent year, a subsequent year, 1958, 1978, 1953, 1954, 1978, the year 1981, 1894

CARDINAL: half, 138/2A, 1978.2, half, 138/3, 797, 18.9.1981, 8173, 5.10.1995, 1150/89(A, 25.9.1995, 8/80-81, 28.3.1981.Please, 22.11.1994, 4302, 1990.Hence, 5.10.1995, 456/90(A, 10.10.1995, 12.10.1995, 22.11.1994, one, 797, 1985]155ITR178(SC, 662 to 668, 3, 24.8.1979, 165, only one, 1981]1SCR823, 8.6.1980, 8.6.1980, 1981]1SCR823, 11, 25.10.1980, 11, 3, 12, 12, 1.6.1979, 1981]1SCR823, two, two, two, 1981]1SCR823, one, two, 1987(30)ELT45(SC, 1986(10)ECC131, two, two, two, 1986ECR1(SC, 1962]1SCR1, 1970]3SCR846, 90, 90, two, 1970]3SCR846, 1976]3SCR58, two, 1970]3SCR846, 1976]3SCR58, 90, 90, one

QUANTITY: 1.65 acres, 1.55 acres, 3.69 acres

PERSON: Tiruchcngode Taluk, Tiruchengodu Taluk, S. Padmanabhan, J., Anandhi Ammal, Ananthi Ammal, Award, Madras, K. Doraiswami, V.N. Mohanraj, P. Sadasivam, V.P. Sengottuvel, S. Padmanabhan, J., K. Doraiswami, K. Doraiswami, P. Sathasivam, S. Padmanabhan, J., Sathasivam, S. Padmanabhan, J., Tamil Nadu, Anandhi Ammal, S. Padmanabhan, J., Bangalore, Ordinance, Karnataka Ordinance No, Joginder Singh, Makhanlal Waza, Joginder Singh, AIR1963SC913, Prabulal Prakash, Janapada Sahha Chhindwara, Radeliffe, M.L. Krishnamurthi, Lakshminarayanan, Maruthappa Nainar, Nagar Rice, Flour Mills, N. Teekappa Gowda, Motibhai Desai v. Roshan, Nainar Sundaram, J., K.M. Natarajan, E.J. Bellie, Nagar Rice, Flour Mills, Teekappa Gowda, Motibhai Desai v. Roshan Kumar, Lakshminarayanan, Maruthappa Nainar, K. Doraiswami, Award, Adi Dravidas, Tamil Nadu Act, Tamil Nadu, Anandhi Ammal

FAC: Tamil Nadu Act 31, Tamil Nadu Act 31, Tamil Nadu Act 31, the Tamil Nadu Act 31 of 1978, Tamil Nadu Act 31, the Tamil Nadu Act 31 of 1978, Tamil Nadu Act 31, Tamil Nadu Act 31, the Tamil Nadu Act 31 of 1978, the Tamil Nadu Act 31 of 1978

ORG: W.P. No, Court, W.P. No, W.P., Court, Additional Government Pleader, Court, the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Harijan Welfare Schemes Act, Court, W.P. No, The Tamil Nadu Acquisition, Court, Act.6, Adi Dravidar Welfare, Adi Dravidar Welfare, the Taluk Magistrate, Tahsildar, the Office of the Special Tahsildar, Adi Dravidar Welfare, the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Lands for Harijan Welfare Schemes Act, the High Court, the Supreme Court of India, the Taluk Magistrate, Tahsildar, Adi Dravidar Welfare, Adi Dravidar Welfare, the Taluk Magistrate, Tahsildar, Government Advocate, Special Government Pleader, Adi Dravidar Welfare, the State Government, Court, the Supreme Court, Court, the State Government, Court, the State Government, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the State Government, Court, Court, Court, the Apex Court, Special Government Pleader, Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the High Court, the Supreme Court, Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Special Government Pleader, Court, the Supreme Court, Court, the Supreme Court, State of, the Supreme Court, State, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Karnataka High Court, the High Court, Sections 2, the High Court, the State Government, State, the Supreme Court, W.P. No., M/s. Hansa Corporation, State, The Supreme Court, State, the Supreme Court, the Karnataka Tax on Entry of Goods, Local, the High Court, the Supreme Court, State, Karnataka Tax on Entry of Goods, Karnataka Act 10 of 1981, Karnataka Act No, Ordinance No. 11, the Supreme Court, Hansa Corporation, the High Court, State, the Supreme Court, State, the Hansa Corporation, State, the Supreme Court, the Division Bench, the Supreme Court, State of Punjab, The Supreme Court, the Division Bench, the Karnataka High Court, the Supreme Court, Shenoy & Co., the High Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, State, State of Punjab, The Supreme Court, State, The Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, State, Court, The Supreme Court, the High Court, State, the High Court, Court, Hansa Corporation's, the Supreme Court, Hansa Corporation's, the High Court, Court, the Hansa Corporation, Court, The Supreme Court, the High Court, the High Court, Star Diamond Co., Union of India A.I.R., S.C. 179, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, Star Diamond Company India, Court, Raj Prakash Chemicals Limited v. Union of India, Indo Afghan Chamber of Commerce, Union of India, Court, M/s. Godrej Soaps', Amalgamated Coalfields Limited, the Supreme Court, Court, U.P., the High Court, Amalgamated Coalfields Ltd., The Society of Medical Officers of Health, A.C. 551, the High Court, Court, Court, Court, the Rice Milling Industry (Regulation) Act, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, S.C. 572, the Bombay Cinemas Regulation Act, the Bombay Cinema Rules, the High Court, Court, Proprietrix, Food Department, L.W. 396, Court, Court, the Division Bench, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Court, Proprietrix, Food Department, Court, the Supreme Court, Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Court, High Court, the Supreme Court, the Division Bench, Proprietrix, Food Department, L.W. 396, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Court, State, the Supreme Court, the High Court, the Supreme Court, the High Court, State, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Validity of Tamil Nadu Act XXXI, State, the Supreme Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Special Government Pleader, the Supreme Court, Court, Court, The Supreme Court, State of, the State Government, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court

WORK_OF_ART: Collector of Tirunelveli, The Collector of Tirunelveli and Ors

LOC: W.P. Nos, W.P. Nos, W.P. Nos

PRODUCT: Tiruchengode, Award No, Tiruchengode, Tiruchengode, the Full Bench, the Full Bench, the Full Bench, the Full Bench, the Full Bench

ORDINAL: first

EVENT: L.W. 396

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //