Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

itc Limited Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise (A)

Decided On : Feb-21-2000

Court : Chennai

LAW: the Customs Act, the Customs Act, Section 35F, Section 35F, Section 35F, Section 35A, Section 35A, Section 35F. Section 35A, Section 35F, Order under Section 35F., Section 35F, Order under Section 35F, Section 37B, Section 37B of the Central Excise Act, Section 35A, Section 129E, the Customs Act, Section 35F, Articles 32, Order under Section 35F, Section 35F, Section 35F, the Customs Act, Section 35F, Section 37B of the Central Excise Act, Article 14, Section 37B of the Act, Section 37B. Section 37B of the Act, the Central Boards of Revenue Act, Section 37B, Section 37B, Section 37B of the Act, Section 255(5, Section 220(6, Section 254, Article 340 P. 155 ', Article 73, Section 37B, Section 4(M, Article 14 of the Constitution, Section 4-M, Section 35A, Section 35A, Section 35A, Section 35F, Section 35A, Section 35F, Section 35A, Article 14, Article 14.The, Article 14.68, Article 14, Article 14 of the Constitution.75, Article 14, Section 35F, Article 14

NORP: J.1, Central Excise, Central Excise, American, thus:-'These

DATE: 11047 of 1999, 15140 of 1999, 20-8-1999, 1999, 1999, 15142, 1999, 1999, 1944, 1962, 1999, 1999, 1994, 1962, 11047, 15140, 1999, two weeks, 15140 of 1999, 1944, 20-8-1999, two/three weeks, 1944, 1947, 1944, 1962, 1944, 1962, 32, 1963, 54 of 1963, '40, 46, 48, 1999, 1947, 1957, the years, '54, 1998, '61, 1971, 1969, three/two weeks, 1978, two/three weeks, 1969, '75, the day, several months, 11047 of 1999, '80

ORG: M/s. ITC Limited, Packaging and Printing Division, M/s. Pradeep Drug Company Limited, M/s. Tapan Preci Tec Limited, M/s. Pradeep Drug Company Limited, W.P. No, Sections 35A, M/s. Tapan Preci Tec Limited, Chennai, Sections 35A, Central Government Standing Counsel, Central Excise (Appeals, Chennai, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Appellate Authority, Central Excise (Appeals, the Central Board of Excise, Customs, the Collector (Appeals, the Central Board of Excise, Customs, the Statutory Appellate Authority, the Appellate Authority, the Appellate Authority, the Central Board of Excise, Customs, M/s. Pradeep Drug Company Limited, Central Excise, Chennai-III Commissionerate, the Assessing Authority, Central Excise (Appeals, Central Excise (Appeals, the Apex Court, Union of India, Ors, Central Excise (Appeals, the Appellate Authority, the Commissioner (Appeals, Central Excise (Appeals, Central Excise (Appeals, the Central Board of Excise, Customs, the Apex Court, Union of India, Jesus Sales Corporation Limited, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Commissioner (Appeals, Asst, Central Excise (Legal, the Commissioner (Appeals, The Appellate Authority, Circular, Central Board of Excise, Customs, the Appellate Authority, the Apex Court, Union of India, Jesus Sales Corporation Limited, the Apex Court, the Appellate Authority and Section 35F, Circular, Circular, the Apex Court, Union of India Limited, Jesus Sales Corporation Limited, Circular, Board, Board, the Appellate Authority, Circular, the Appellate Authority, the Appellate Authority, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, Union of India, Jesus Sales Corporation Limited, Circular, the Board of Central Excise, the Apex Court, the Appellate Authority, Board, the Appellate Authority, the Calcutta High Court, Hooghly Mills Co. Ltd., Union of India, the Appellate Authority, the Appellate Tribunal, Central Excise (Appeals, the Central Board of Excise, Board, the Appellate Authority, Board, Board, Circular, the Central Board of Excise, Customs, Sections 35A, Circular, the Central Board, Central Excise (Appeals, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Commissioner (Appeals, Central Excise (Appeals, the Central Board, the Appellate Authority, Circular, the Central Board, the Apex Court, Union of India, the Gujarat High Court, the Apex Court, Circular, the Commissioner (Appeals, Board, Board, the Commissioner (Appeals, Board, Board, Board, the Commissioner (Appeals, Board, The Central Board of Excise, Customs, Central Excise (Appeals, the Central Board of Excise, Customs, Central Excise (Appeals, the Excise Authorities, the Gujarat High Court, Bench, Board, Board, Tribunal, Advocate, Board, Board, Board, Tribunal, Board, Tribunal, the Gujarat High Court, Board, Tribunal, Board, Tribunal, Board, Tribunal, Board, Appeal, Apex Court, the Apex Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Circular, Tribunal, the Gujarat High Court, Pioneer Miyagi Chemicals Private Limited v., Central Board of Customs & Excise, Board, Board, Central Excise (Appeals, Central Excise (Appeals, the Central Board, Central Excise (Appeals, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Commissioner (Appeals, Appellate Authority, the Appellate Authority, the Original Authority, the Apex Court, Income Tax Officer, AIR 1969, Supreme Court, The Apex Court, Tribunal, the Apex Court, the Appellate Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, Appellate, the Appellate Tribunal, Appellate, the Appellate Tribunals, Tribunal, AIR 1970, Supreme Court, the Apex Court, The Regional Transport Authority, the Apex Court, the Central Board of Excise, Customs, Board, the Collector (Appeal, Orient Paper Mills Ltd., Union of India, AIR 1969, Supreme Court, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Apex Court, the Gujarat High Court, Court, W.P. No, the Central Board, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Apex Court, Income Tax Officer, the Appellate Authority, Order, the Central Board, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Central Board, Bought, Circular, the Commissioner (Appeals, Circular, the Central Board, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Appellate Authority, the Appellate Authority, the Apex Court, Union of India, Board, Counsel, the Apex Court, Union of India, the Appellate Authority, the Appellate Authority, Lordships, the Appellate Authority, Appellate, Court, Shyam Kishore, Ors, Municipal Corporation, Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, the Appellate authority, the Appellate Authorities, the Appellate Authority, the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, Appellate, the Union of India, Appellate, Appellate, Appellate, Appellate, Appellate, Appellate, Lordships of the Supreme Court, the Apex Court, Appellate, Authority, Lordships, the Appellate Authority, Lordships, the Appellate Authority, Appellate, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Appellate Authority, Court, the Appellate Authority, Authority, the Commissioner (Appeals, Appellate Authority, the Apex Court, Sangfroid Remedies Ltd., Union of India, the Calcutta High Court, Bongaigaon Refinery & Petrochem, Collector of C.Ex, The Calcutta High Court, Tata Iron & Steel Co. Ltd., Commissioner (Appeals, Central Excise, the Commissioner (Appeals, Order, Roy v. Collector of Customs - : 1983ECR1667D(SC, the Commissioner (Appeals, Appellate, Authority, Hills Division and Appeals, Order, Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Weaker Section Welfare Association, Karnataka and Ors, State, the Apex Court, Union of India, Speakers, Ors, v. Union of India and Ors, Bench, State, State, State, Norwest Hoist Ltd., State for Trade, Union of India v. Col, Swadeshi, Union of India, J. Mahapatra, Order, the Original Authority, the Central Board, the Apex Court, Union of India, Jesus Sales Corporation, J., the Civil Appeal, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, audi, Lordships, Lordships, Court, the Apex Court, the Commissioner (Appeals, The Appellate Authority, Appellate Authority, the Supreme Court, Income Tax Officer, S.C. 430, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Original Authority, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Appellate Authority, the Assessing Authority, the Appellate Authority, W.P. No, Central Excise (Appeals, the Appellate Authority, the Appellate Authority, the Apex Court, Court, Circular, the Central Board, Union of India, Hindustan Development Corporation, The Apex Court, Administrative Law, Administrative Law, Sixth Edition, Home, the Supreme Court, the Commissioner of Appeals, the Commissioner (Appeals, Court, Circular, the Central Boards of Excise, Customs, Court, Circular, the Commissioner (Appeals, Court, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Commissioner (Appeals

CARDINAL: 15-6-1999, 1,25,00,000/-, 1-6-1999, 380, 459/16/99, 30-3-1999, 35F, 37B, 128, 129, 265, 459/16/99, 30-3-1999, 35F, 37B, 265, three, one, 1996(83)ELT486(SC, 1996(83)ELT486(SC, 35F, 1996(83)ELT486(SC, 37B, 265, 226, 1999(108)ELT637(Cal, 459/16/99, 30-3-1999, 35F, 37B, 265, two, 265, 1996(88)ELT35(Guj, 39, one, 2802.00, 23.02, 2303.00, 23.02, 2000(116)ELT441(Mad, 430, 759, 761, 2, 73, 399, 2000(116)ELT441(Mad, two, 1996(83)ELT486(SC, 1, two, One, AIR1992SC2279, 2, 1, two, two, 1, 103, 5, 1994(69)ELT193(Cal, 1998(98)ELT350(Cal, 1, 405, 1991]1SCR974, 1994]1SCR754, 6, 1, 66, 1986)ILLJ36SC, 14, 1, 201, 1969]1SCR317, 1970]1SCR457, 1970)IILLJ284SC, 1981]2SCR533, 1985]1SCR322, 1978]2SCR621, 1996(83)ELT486(SC, one, 424, 522, 1978]2SCR621

ORDINAL: first, first, second, second, second, second, first, first, first, first, first, first, second, second, second, second, second, first, first, first, first, first, first, third, third, third, second, first, first, first, second

PERSON: Order, Order, Articles 14, Articles 14, Habibulla Basha, R. Raghavan, K. Veera Raghavan, Addl, Order, Jesus Sales Corporation Limited, Chennai-III, Articles 14, Articles 14, Jesus Sales Corporation, B.C. Patel, J., Ajmera, Patel, Patel, Cannanore, M.K. Mohammed Kunhi, Dhani Devi v. Sant Bihari Sharma, Corpus Juris Secondum, Vol, Dhani Devi's, Cannanore, Jesus Sales Corporation, Jesus Sales Corporation, Anr, Order, Cal, Order, facie, facie, Order, Mohindersingh Gill, Nagendra Nath Bora, Anr, Cannanore, M.K. Mohammed Kunhi, Order, Anr, Ravi S. Naik v. Union, Administrative Law, Administrative Law, Menaka Gandhi, Court, Tulsiram Patel, Satyavir Singh, D.P. Madon, Suresh Koshy George v. University, A.K. Kraipak v. Union, J.N. Sinha, Cotton Mills, Menaka Gandhi, Order, Order, N.P. Singh, Order, Order, Cannanore, M.K. Mohammed Kunhi, I.T.C. Limited v. Commissioner, exercise.78, importance.79, Scarman, Kraipak, Menaka Gandhi

LOC: W.P. Nos, petitioners.23

GPE: New Delhi, New Delhi, India, India, Indichem v. Union of India, whims, justice.56, F.N., provisions.62, Bhagwati, England, India, Orissa, AIR, Counsel, H.W.R.

PRODUCT: 35A, pre-deposit.22, Rule 213 of the Central Excise Rules, Section 35F, Circulars, Calcutta, audi alteram, Co.

EVENT: S.C. 430 Income Tax Officer

WORK_OF_ART: Orders

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //