Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Commr. of Cus. (Air), Chennai Vs. Cus. and C. Ex. Settlement Commission

Decided On : Oct-18-2001

Court : Chennai

Notice (8): Undefined index: topics [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 36]
Warning (2): Invalid argument supplied for foreach() [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 39]

LAW: Section 127B, the Customs Act, Section 127C(1, Section 127B, the Bill of Entry No, the CHAand M/s. Sanjay Forwarders P. Ltd., the Bill of Entry, the Customs Act, the Bill of Entry, Bill of Entry, Section 124 of the Act, Section 127B of the Customs Act, Section 127A(b, Section 127A(b, Section 127A(b, Section 127A of the Act, the Bill of Entry, Section 127B of the Act, Section 111(i, Section 127B of the Act.7, the Customs Act, the Bill of Entry, Section 127A(b, Section 127B of the Act, Section 123 of the Act, Section 127A(b, Section 127A(b, Section 124, the Customs Act, the Customs Act, Section 127B of the Act, Section 5C, the Cinematograph Act, Section 5D(11, Section 5C, the Customs Act, Section 127B of the Act, Section 127C of the Act, Section 127B of the Act, Section 127C of the Act, Section 127B of the Act, Section 127C(1, the Customs Act, the Customs Act, the Customs Act, Section 127A to Section 127N of the Act, Section 127B, Section 127B, Chapter XIVA, the Customs Act, Section 127A(b, Section 127B of the Act, Section 127A of the Act, the Bill of Entry, the Bill of Entry, Section 127A(b, Section 127B of the Act.14, Section 245A(b, the Customs Act, Section 245C, Section 127B of the Act, Section 127B and Section 127C of the Act, the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 127B of the Act, the Bill of Entry, Section 127B(1, Section 127A(b, Section 127A(b, the Customs Act, the Customs Act, Section 124, the Customs Act, Section 111(i, Section 127B of the Act, Section 127A(b, Section 127B of the Act, Section 127B of the Act, Section 127B, Section 127B., Section 127B, Section 127B, Section 127B of the Act, Section 127B of the Act, Section 127C of the Act

ORG: ORDERD, the Commissioner of Customs (Air), Customs House, Respondents 2, Customs, Central Excise Settlement Commission, Chennai, M/s. Emery World Wide, Acer, HAWB, Bill of Entry, Acer, CHA, M/s. Emery World Wide, Cellular Mobile, CHA, Department, ACC, Chennai, Mobile Phones, CHA, Customs, Mobile Phones, Plastic Fliptop, Department, Department, M/s. Emery Worldwide, Government, Customs, Central Excise Settlement Commission, Commission, M/s. Moonstar Automation P. Ltd., Customs, Commission, Commission, Additional Solicitor General, Commission, Learned Counsel, Commission, Commission, Learned Additional Solicitor General, the Commissioner of Customs (Air, Commission, Commission, the Narcotic Drugs, the Cellular Mobile Phones, Commission, Commission, CIF, MV, CIF, Commission, Learned Counsel, Commission, the Commissioner of Customs (Air, Commission, Commission, Department, Commission, the Commissioner of Customs (Air, Special Intelligence and Investigation Branch, Air Cargo Complex, Chennai, Cellular Mobile, Acer, Investigation, Goutham Chand Jain of M/s. Goutham Enterprises, the State Government, COFEPOSA, Commission, the Commissioner of Customs (Airport, Court, the Central Board of Film Certification v., the Central Board of Film Certification, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, Government of India, the Film Certification Appellate Tribunal, Court, Tribunal, Board, Court, Board, Tribunal, Board, the Central Board of Film Certification, Commission, the Commissioner of Customs, the Settlement Commission, the Settlement Commission, the Commissioner of Customs, the Settlement Commission, the Settlement Commission, Customs, Customs, the Commissioner of Customs, Commission, the Commissioner of Customs, Commission, Commission, Department, Commission, Commission, Commission, Settlement Commission, Settlement Commission, Commission, Committee, the Supreme Court of India, the Direct Taxes Inquiry Committee, Department, Settlement Commission, Commission, Settlement Commission, the Settlement Commission, the Settlement Commission, the Central Government, the Settlement Commission, the Settlement Commission, the Appellate Tribunal, the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, the Commissioner of Customs, the Settlement Commission, Customs, the Settlement Commission, the Commissioner of Customs, the Settlement Commission, the Settlement Commission, Customs, Bench, Customs, the Settlement Commission, the Settlement Commission, Commission, Special Intelligence and Investigation Branch, Chennai, Acer, Department, Commission, The Supreme Court, Collector of Customs, The Supreme Court, Income Tax, Express Newspapers Ltd., the Settlement Commission, the Supreme Court, Commission, The Supreme Court, the Settlement Commission, Kuldeep Industrial Corporation v., Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, the Supreme Court, the Settlement Commission, Department, Department, the Settlement Commission, the Special Intelligence Investigation Team, Settlement Commission, The Settlement Commission, the Respondents 2, the Supreme Court, Narsingh Das Tapadia, CRI, the Supreme Court, Commission, the Settlement Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Department, Commission, Commission, the Respondents 2 to 4, Act.18, CIF, MV, CIF, MV, Commission, Court, Commission, Additional Solicitor General, Commission, Department, Department

PERSON: Chennai, Bill, Shri P. R, Sivaramakrishnan, Shri S. Janakiraman, Shri S. Janakiraman, S. Janakiraman, Shri S. Janakiraman, V.C. Mohan, Shri Shekar, Shri Janakiraman, Bill, C. Gunasekaran, Bill, Shri S. Janakiraman, Shri S. Janakiraman, Shri Goutham, S. Janakiraman, Goutham Chand Jain, V.T. Gopalan, M. Krishnappan, Shri S. Janaktraman, Chennai, penalty, Shri V.C., Shri S. Janakiraman, List, Chapter XIVA, Goutham Enterprises, Janakiraman, Shaila Kapoor, Madras, Penalty, Shri V.C., Shri S. Janakiraman

CARDINAL: 15-2-2001, 32, 300, 17, 19, 300, 50, one, one, two, two, 24, one, one, 736, 246, 35, 6, 8.4, 80, 300, one, 19, 2, 2, 4, 57,87,200/-, 11,56,805/-, 11,56,805/-, 3, 9, 2, 21.0, 57,87,2007-, 1962;IV, 835, 1, 1, 2, 83, one, one, 1, two, 1, 19, one, 300, 736, one, two, 1A, 1A, two, 4, 57,87,200/-, 57,87,200/-, 1962;IV, 1962.'In, 24.0, 15-2-2001

ORDINAL: first, first, first, fourth, third, second, second, second, fourth, second, second, second, second, second, first, Secondly, Thirdly, second, second, second, second, Fourthly, second, first, second, second, first, second, second, second, second, second, second, second, second, second, second, second, second, second, second, second, second, second, first, fourth, second, third, second, second, second, second, second, second, second, second, second, 2nd, second, second, second, second, second, second, second, second, second, second, second, first, first, second, second

DATE: 1962, 5500717618, 235337, 20-7-2000, 24-7-2000, 24-7-2000, 1962, 25-7-2000, 25-7-2000, 25-7-2000, 26-7-2000, the past 10 years, 28-7-2000, 28-7-2000, 19-9-2000, 1974, 1962, 1985, 61 of 1985, 19-9-2000, a period of, 30 days, 4, 19-9-2000, 25-7-2000, 19-9-2000, 30 days, 1962, 1994, a period of, one month, two months, frustrated.11, 1962, the year 1976, 1998, 1985, 61 of 1985, a period of, one month, two months, two months, '15, 1991, between the assessment year 1977-78, years 1978-79 and 1979-80, one assessment year, 1977-78, three assessment years, three years, between assessment year 1977-78, two assessment years, three years, three years, 1977-78, three assessment years, 2000, 1326, 1881, 30 days, 1962, 1985, three weeks

LOC: South India

GPE: Meenambakkam, Singapore, India, India, Tribunal.10, India, India, New Delhi, M.M.T.C., S.C.C., India, Counsel

TIME: under COFEPOSA Act

NORP: se.en

EVENT: S.C. 3631

FAC: Para 21.0

MONEY: 21.0 (ii

View Full Judgment


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //