Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

The State of Madras, Represented by the Collector of Chingleput District Vs. W.V.A. Govindaraja Chettiar

Decided On : Dec-05-1967

Court : Chennai

LAW: Madras Act XLII, Section 3(1, Section 7 of the Act, the Land Acquisition Act, Section 80, Section 3, Section 7 of the Act, Exhibit 6-14, the Acquisition Act, Article 299 of the Constitution, Article 299, Constitution, Article, Article 299 of the Constitution, Article 299 of the Constitution, Article 299-, Section 70, the Indian Contract Act, Section 70, Section 175, Section 175, Section 70, Section 70, Section 175, Section 175, Section 70, Section 175, the Contract Act, Section 175, Section 70

PERSON: K. Srinivasan, J.1, Exhibit B-2, Exhibit B-7, Exhibit A-4, Exhibit B-10, Exhibit B-14, Exhibit B-16, C. R. Krishna Rao, Exhibit B-1, Sri K. Dhandayudham, Venkataswami, B. K. Mondal, Lordships

LOC: Madras, Madras

ORG: Court, State Seed Farm, the Department of Agriculture, Department, Government, Sections 3, the Department of Agriculture, Department, Land Acquisition, the Madras State Electricity Board, Exhibit-A, the Department of Agriculture, the Department of Agriculture, the District Agricultural, The District Agricultural, Department, the District Agricultural, the District Agricultural, the Acting District Agricultural, Department, Department, Department, Department, Government, The State of Madras, Additional Government Pleader, Department, Government, Department, Land Acquisition, Department, Department, Department, the Acting District Agricultural, Department, Department, Department, Department, Department, Department, the State Seed Farm, Department, Department, State, Department, Additional Government Pleader, The Board of Revenue, Additional Government Pleader, State, Additional Government Pleader, State, the Department of Agriculture, the Head of the Department, Department, Department, Department, the Head of the Department, the Supreme Court, The State of Bihar v. Karamchand and Brothers Ltd., the Supreme Court, Government, the Director of Agriculture, Department, Lordships, the Government of a State, the Government of a State under Section 70, the Government of India Act, the Government of India Act, Court, the Government of India Act, State, the State Government, Government, The New Marine Coal Co. v. Union of India, the Government of India Act, Department, Court, Additional Government Pleader, the Assistant Agricultural Engineer

QUANTITY: over 17 acres

DATE: six months, 21st August, 1957, 1st October, 1957 to 31st March, 1958, 1956, 5th January, 1958, a period of two months, October, 1957, the same day, 31st March, 1958, Nearly a year later, 17th March, 1959, 26th March, 1959, a period of, six months, May, 1959, 7th April, 1959, the middle of May, 1959, 15th June, 1959, more than 20 months, 1st April, 1958, 5th January, 1958, 24th January, 1958, 26th December, 1958, nearly nine months, June, 1959, 1st June, 1959, D.W. 1, various months, 1955, December, 1958

ORDINAL: 1st, firstly

CARDINAL: 30,000, 2, 4, 29,000, 7,837-3, 1, one, 3-34, 6, two, no less than three, 2, 1962]1SCR827, 1966]3SCR919, 1, one, 3, 3, 3, two, two, 3, 3).In, 3, 6-34, 6, one

WORK_OF_ART: the Collector of Chingleput, the Collector of Chingleput, Subordinate

GPE: Subordinate, K. P. Chowdary v., The State of West Bengal

MONEY: 215, 1964]2SCR859 Section 70

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //