J. Jayalalitha Vs. State Represented by Superintendent of Police, Special Investigation Cell,vigilance and Anti Corruption, Chennai,

Decided On : Jan-10-2002

Court : Chennai

LAW: Section 173(8, Section 166A of Code of Criminal Procedure.1.2, Chapter, Section 173 Cr, Section 170, Section 158, Section 170, Section 161, Prevention of Corruption Act, Section 13(2, Prevention of Corruption Act, Section 109 Indian Penal Code, Prevention of Corruption Act, Section 61 of Code of Criminal Procedure, Prevention of Corruption Act, Section 173(8, Section 166A, Section 13(1)(e, Section 173(8, Section 319 of Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 173(8, Section 173 of Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 173(2, Section 173(2, Section 13(1)(e, Article 20(2, Article 21 of the Constitution of India, Section 166A, Section 166A of Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 166A of Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 173(8, Section 166-A of Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 13(1)(e, Section 220(1, Section 221(1, Section 13(1)(e, Section 13(1)(e, Section 16, Section 13(1)(e, Prevention of Corruption Act, Section 3 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, Prevention of Corruption Act, Section 3(1, Section 16 of Prevention of Corruption Act, Section 173(8, Section 462 Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 460(e, Section 2(n, Section 33, Section 13(1)(e, Prevention of Corruption Act, Section 218 nor Section 223 of Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 166A of Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 166-A Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 13(1)(e, Section 13(1)(e, Prevention of Corruption Act, Section 173(8, Section 166A of Code of Criminal Procedure, the Military Laws, Section 173(8, Section 13(1)(e, Prevention of Corruption Act, Section 482 Code, Section 166-A Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 173(8, Section 482 Code, Section 482, Section 13(1)(e, Prevention of Corruption Act, Section 13(1)(e, Prevention of Corruption Act, Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 166-A Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 173(8, Section 173 of Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 173(2, Section 173(2, Section 166A of Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 173(8, Section 166A of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 166A Cr, Chapter, Section 173(8, Section 166A, Section 166A of Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 166A of Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 166A Code, Section 166A of Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 166A of Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 166A of Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 166A of Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 173(8, Section 173(8, Section 173(8, Section 170 of the Code, Section 169 of the Code, Section 173 of the Code, Section 173(2, Section 173(8, Section 169, Section 173 of the Code, section 173(8, Section 166A of Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 173(8, Section 482, Section 166-A of Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 173(8

GPE: Dinakaran, India, India, Crl, Crl, Crl, Crl, Crl, Crl, India, Crl, Singapore, Malaysia, United Kingdom, Crl, India, Crl, Crl, Crl, Sudhagaran, Crl, Crl, Sudhagaran, A2, Spl, Spl, Spl, Crl, Spl, Spl, F.I.R., Crl, Spl, Spl, Crl, Crl, Spl, J.ALEXANDER, Crl, Spl, Spl, Spl, Crl, Crl, F.I.R., Spl, Spl, Spl, Spl, Crl, Crl, India, India, Crl, Crl, Crl, Crl, Public, Spl, India, India, M.KRISHNA, M.KRISHNA, M.KRISHNAREDDY v., India, India, H.N.RISHBUD v. STATE, Crl, Spl, Crl, Crl, Spl, India, Crl, Spl, London, United Kingdom, United Kingdom, India, India, India, India, United Kingdom, India, India, United Kingdom, India, Dubai, Malaysia, Singapore, Hong Kong, British Virgin Islands, the United Kingdom, Crl, Spl, Crl, Crl, India, Crl, Spl, Spl, K.K.S., Spl, Spl, Crl, Spl, India, Spl, India, M.KRISHNA, Spl, Crl, India, Crl, India, Crl, Spl, Crl, Issue, Spl, India, India, India, India, United Kingdom, Crl, justice.14.9, Spl, J.ALEXANDER, Cr, Kamalapati Trivedi, SURENDRA, Spl, Crl, Crl, Crl, J.ALEXANDER, SATYA, NARAYAN, SHARMA, SATYA, NARAYAN, SHARMA, Issue:4

PERSON: J.1.1, 166A Cr, Tamil Nadu, Tamil Nadu, K.Asokan, Head Quarters, N.Sassikala, Vn, Ilavrasi, A3, A4, Head Quarters, Chennai, N.Sassikala, Vn, Ilavarasi, A3, A4, K.Asokan, Chennai, K.Asokan, Spl, K.Asokan, Spl, Spl, K.Asokan, Asokan, Spl, B.Kumar, K.Asokan, B.Kumar, N.R.Chandran, I.Subramaniam, N.R.Chandran, R.Shanmugasundaram, N.R.Elango, R.Shanmugasundaram, Spl, Tamil Nadu, Sri Lanka, Tamil Nadu, Chennai, Chennai, Chennai, R.Shanmugasundaram, K.Asokan, B. Kumar, R.Shanmugasundaram, R.Shanmugasundaram, Head Quarters, Spl, Spl, LUMBHARDAR ZUTSHI v. THE KING, Spl, J., J., P.C., Spl, Chennai, Spl, R.Shanmugasundaram, N.R.Elango, Crl

ORG: the Letters Rogatory, Sections 166A, Criminal Court, Court, Court, Central Government, Magistrate, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, A2, Principal Sessions, Chennai, the Superintendent of Police, Vigilance & Anti-Corruption, Special Investigation, Chennai, the Prevention of Corruption Act, the Prevention of Corruption Act, the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, Principal Sessions, Chennai, Crime No.13/AC/96, A2, the 'Check Period', the 'Designated Court', the Designated Court, Principal Sessions, Chennai, the Designated Court, the Letters Rogatory, Principal Sessions, ARJUNA, the Designated Court, the Designated Court, Chennai, the Designated Court, the Prevention of Corruption Act, the Designated Court, the Designated Court, SURENDRA NATH v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH, the Designated Court, the Designated Court, the Designated Court, the Designated Court, F.I.R, the Prevention of Corruption Act, the Designated Court, Principal Sessions, Chennai, Principal Sessions, Chennai, the Designated Court, Principal Sessions, Chennai, Letters Rogatory, Principal Sessions, Chennai, the Letters Rogatory, Principal Sessions, Chennai, Principal Sessions, Chennai, the Designated Court, Principal Sessions, Chennai, the Designated Court, Principal Sessions, Chennai, the Letters Rogatory, Principal Sessions, Chennai, Principal Sessions, Chennai, Principal Sessions, Chennai, the Designated Court, Principal Sessions, Chennai, the Designated Court, Advocate General, Public Prosecutor, the Letters Rogatory, Principal Sessions, Chennai, Advocate General, Letters Rogatory, the Designated Court, Advocate General, Court, the Designated Court, Principal Sessions, Chennai, the Prevention of Corruption Act, the Prevention of Corruption Act, the Prevention of Corruption Act, First Information Report, T.T. ANTONY Vs >, the Prevention of Corruption Act, Court, A2, the Designated Court, the Public Prosecutor, Court, the Public Prosecutor, the Public Prosecutor, Court, Public Prosecutor, Government Advocate, Court, Amicus, Amicus Curiae, Principal Sessions, Chennai, Government, Principal Sessions, Chennai, Government, S.C.) Department, Principal Sessions, Chennai, Principal Sessions, Chennai, the Designated Court, the Prevention of Corruption Act, the Designated Court, Principal Sessions, Chennai, RAM, LAL, Court, KARI, CHOUDHARY, SITA DEVI & OTHERS, SCCL, Principal Sessions, Chennai, the Designated Court, Principal Sessions, Chennai, TRISUNS CHEMICAL INDUSTRY v., the Apex Court, Magistrate, Court, AIR 1965, KHARKAN, AMRITLAL, AIR 1981, the Prevention of Corruption Act, Government, Principal Sessions, Chennai, the Letters Rogatory, the Designated Court, the Designated Court, Letters Rogatory, Letters Rogatory, the Designated Court, iii)the Government of India, Ministry of External Affairs, the United Kingdom Central Authority, the High Commission of India at, the Government of India, Letters Rogatory, the United Kingdom Central Authority, Letters Rogatory, Letters Rogatory, this Letter of Rogatory, b.in Letters Rogatory, the United Kingdom Authorities, Serious Fraud Office, the U.K. Home Office, the United Kingdom Home Office, Authority, Letters Rogatory, the United Kingdom Authorities, the Letter of Request, Serious Fraud Office, the U.K. Home Office, the United Kingdom Home Office, Authority, this Letter Rogatory, Letters Rogatory, the United Kingdom Authorities, the Letter of Request, Serious Fraud Office, the U.K. Home Office, the United Kingdom Home Office, Authority, this Letter Rogatory, the Designated Court, the Letters Rogatory, the Designated Court, Principal Sessions, Chennai, Principal Sessions, Chennai, Principal Sessions, Court, Principal Sessions, Chennai, the Designated Court, the Designated Court, the Letters Rogatory, the Designated Court, First Information Report, Principal Sessions, Principal Sessions, Court, the Prevention of Corruption Act, DARABSHAW, LAL, the Prevention of Corruption Act, Court, C.D.S. SWAMY v. THE, Amicus Curiae, the First Information Report, MAHARASHTRA, MAHARASHTRA, Principal Sessions, Chennai, the Designated Court, Designated, the Designated Court, Principal Sessions, Chennai, the Designated Court, RAM, LAL, RAM, LAL, the Designated Court, the First Information Report, Principal Sessions, Chennai, Court, the Designated Court, Principal Sessions, Chennai, P.P. SHARMA, Court, Principal Sessions, Chennai, the Designated Court, the Designated Court, Principal Sessions, Chennai, Court, Principal Sessions, Chennai, Court, Court, the Designated Court, Principal Sessions, Chennai, the Letters Rogatory, the Designated Court, First Information Report, Principal Sessions, Magistrate, PRABHU v. EMPEROR, AIR 1950, the Letters Rogatory, the Designated Court.14.4., Court, Letters Rogatory, Criminal Court, Court, Court, Central Government, A Letter Rogatory, Letters Rogatory, the Letter Rogatory, The Letters Rogatory, the Designated Court, Letters Rogatory, Letters Rogatory, the Letters Rogatory, Letters Rogatory, Court, Letters, Principal Sessions, Chennai, the Designated Court, the Designated Court, Letters Rogatory, the Letters Rogatory, Court, BALDEV SINGH, Court, the Letters Rogatory, the Letter Rogatory, the Central Government, Court, the Apex Court, State, Letters Rogatory, Principal Sessions, Chennai, the Designated Court, the Letters Rogatory, Principal Sessions, ARJUNA, L.J. 449, Court, the Designated Court, the Designated Court, justice.15.3, L.J. 592, Magistrate, Court, Magistrate, Court, Court, C.L.J.1745, Allahabad High Court, Court, Court, CONNELLY, the Letters Rogatory, the Designated Court, Court, Principal Sessions, Chennai, Court, Court, the Letters Rogatory, Chennai, Principal Sessions, Chennai, the Designated Court, XI Additional Sessions and Special, the Designated Court, the Designated Court, the Designated Court, Principal Sessions, Chennai, the Apex Court, RAM, LAL, ARJUNA, the Designated Court, Designated Court, the Apex Court, the Designated Court, the Designated Court, Public Prosecutor, Government Advocate, Amicus Curiae

CARDINAL: 173, 1, 2, 3, 1, 6)If, 5, 2, 2, 6, 2, 2.1, 2.9.2000, 1.7.1991, 30.4.1996, 2001.2.2, 109, 18.9.96, 13, 1.7.1991, 2.9.2000, 2.9.2000, 23.3.2001, 1.7.1991, 30.4.1996, 1.7.1991, 30.4.1996, 2.9.2000, 2.9.2000, 23.3.2001, 1, 23.3.2001, 23.3.2001, 4.1, No.2, 2.9.2000, 23.3.2001, 173, 23.3.2001, 1.7.1991, 30.4.1996, two, 6., 2, 4, 218(1, 223, 823, 479, 397, 898, two, two, two, 2.9.2000, 9, 1.7.1991, 30.4.1996, 2, 4, 6.3.2000, 20.9.2000, 12.12.2000, 6.3.2000, 6.3.2000, 30.8.2000, 6.3.2000, 30.8.2000, 1.7.1991, 30.4.1996, 2.9.2000, 23.3.2001, 1.7.1991, 30.4.1996, 11, 2.9.2000, 23.3.2001, 18.9.96, 2.9.2000, 23.3.2001, 12.1, 1, 12.3, 690, 426, 12.4, 2, 2.9.2000, 23.3.2001, 18.9.96, 2, 4, 2.9.2000, 479, 18.9.96, 2, 4, 2.9.2000, 23.3.2001, two, 192, 23.3.2001, 2, 4, 3, 2.9.2000, 14.3, 6, 26, 1, 2, 3, 1, one, 14.6, 6.3.2000, 2.9.2000, 23.3.2001, 14.10, 14.11, 14.12, 14.13, 23.3.2001, 6.3.2000, 30.8.2000, 4, 2, 2, 6, one, two, two, one, two, two, two, 2, 2.9.2000, 23.3.2001, 23.3.2001, 15.7

ORDINAL: first, first, second, first, second, second

DATE: 22506 of 2001, 2001, 2001, 22.3.2001, 23.3.2001, 1988, 1988, 2001, 1988, 1988, 2001, 2001, 2001, 2001, 1988, 2001, 2001, 2001, 2001, 1988, 2001, 2001, 1997, 1997, F.I.R. No.2/AC/2000/HQ, 23.3.2001, 2001, 1997, 1997, 2001, 2001, 1997, 1997, F.I.R. No.2/AC/2000/HQ, 2001, 2001, 1997, 1997, 1997, 2000, L.J. 1745, 2001, 1997, 2001, 1997, 1997, 2001, 1997, 23.3.2001, 2001, 2001, 1997, 2001, 2001, 2001, 2001, 1998, 72, 2001, 1997, 2001, 1997, 2001, 2001, 2001, 2001, 2001, 2001, 2001, 1997, 23.3.2001, 2001, 1997, 2001, 1997, 1997, 1997, 2001, 2001, 2001, 2001, 2001, 2001, 11.12.2001, 11.12.2001, 12.12.2001, 8931, 9026 of 2001, 1997, 2000, 2001, 22.3.2001, 2001, 1997, 2001, 1979, 1999, 39, two F.I.Rs, 1999, 2001, 23.3.2001, 2000, 47, 1992, 1997, 2001, 23.3.2001, 2001, 2001, 22.3.2001, 1997, 2001, 2001, 1997, 2001, 13.4.1998, 25.9.1998, 21.11.2000, 1997, 10.8.1998, 13.4.1998, 25.9.1998, 13.4.1998, 25.9.1998, 13.4.1998, 25.9.1998, 2001, 1997, 2001, 2001, 2001, 2001, 2001, 2001, 2001, 1997, 1997, 1997, 2001, 2001, 1981, 1992, 2001, 1997, 1997, 2001, 1997, 2001, 1997, 1979, 23.3.2001, 1979, 1999, 1997, 2001, 2001, 2001, 1997, 2001, 1992, 2001, 2001, 1997, 2001, 1997, 2001, 2001, 1997, 2001, 1997, 23.3.2001, 2001, 1997, 13.4.1998, 25.9.1998, 1997, 2001, 2001, 1997, 2001, 1997, 14.14, 13.4.1998, 25.9.1998, 2001, 1989, 23.3.2001, 1996, 2001, 1964, 1997, 2001, 2001, 1997, 23.3.2001, 1997, 2001, 2001, 2001, 1997, 2001, 1979, a period of, six months, today, 2001

PRODUCT: A1, Sections 166A, R.SARALA, F.I.R.No.2-AC-2000, VS

NORP: KARNATAKA, d., Issue:1, PUNJAB, KARNATAKA

EVENT: General Clauses Act, SC 682, SC 301, Sections 173(1