Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Aravindadevi, J. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Decided On : Aug-24-1999

Court : Chennai

LAW: Section 16(2, the Provident Funds Act, Section 16(2, the Provident Funds Act, Section 16(2, the Provident Funds Act, Section 16(2, the Provident Funds Act, Section 16(2, the Provident Funds Act, Section 16(2, the Provident Funds Act, Section 16(2, the Provident Funds Act, Section 16(2, the Provident Funds Act, the Provident Funds Act, Section 16(2, the Provident Funds Act, the Provident Funds Act, Section 16(2, the Provident Funds Act, Section 16(2, the Provident Funds Act, Section 1(5, the Provident Funds Act, Section 16(2, the Provident Funds Act, the Provident Funds Act, Section 16(2, the Provident Funds Act, the Provident Funds Act, the Provident Funds Act, the Provident Funds Act, Section 16(2, the Provident Funds Act, the Provident Funds Act, Section 1(5, the Provident Funds Act, the Provident Funds Act, Section 16(2, the Provident Funds Act, Section 16(1, the Provident Funds Act, Section 16(1, Section 17(1, the Provident Funds Act, Section 17(1, the Provident Funds Act, the Provident Funds Act, Section 13(2, the General Clauses Act, Section 16(2, the Provident Funds Act, the General Clauses Act, the Industrial Disputes Act, Section 2-A of the Industrial Disputes Act, Section 2-A of the Industrial Disputes Act, Section 3 of the U. P. Act, the Industrial Disputes Act, the Provident Funds Act, Section 1(5, the Provident Funds Act, the Provident Funds Act, Section 16(2, the Provident Funds Act, the Provident Funds Act, Section 16(2, the Provident Funds Act, the Provident Funds Act, Section 16(2, the Provident Funds Act, Section 16(2, Section 16(2, the Provident Funds Act

PERSON: N.V. Balasubrmanian, S. Balasubramanian, Vittaldas Jagannathadas v. Regional Provident Fund, Gazette, Vittaldas Jagannathadas v. Regional Provident Fund, J., S. Balasubramanian, S. Balasubramanian, Mazdoor Sangh, S. Balasubramanian

NORP: J.1

ORG: Murugan Transport, Murugan Transport, Murugan Service, Murugan Transport, Murugan Service, the 'Provident Funds Act', well.3, the Central Government, the Central Government, the Central Government, the Central Government, the Calcutta High Court, Visva Bharati v., Regional Provident Fund, Court, Legislature, the Central Government, the Central Government, the Central Government, the Central Government, Court, ANTANARAYANAN, Phrases Judicially Defined, BURROWS, OXFORD, the Central Government, Legislature, Legislature, Parliament, the Central Government, the Central Government, Central, Court, the Supreme Court, Industrial Tribunal, the Apex Court, the Industrial Tribunal, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, Newspapers Ltd., State Industrial Tribunal, Legislature, The Supreme Court, the U. P. Industrial Disputes Act, the Apex Court, State Governmental, Management of Indian Cable Company Ltd., the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Burhanpur Tapti Mills Ltd., Burhanpur Tapti Mills, the Central Government, the Central Government, the Calcutta High Court, Visva Bharati v., Regional Provident Fund

CARDINAL: only one, only one, two, two, four, 16(1, 17(1, twenty, 240, 2, more than one, one, 16(1, 17(1, 1957)IILLJ1SC, 1957)IILLJ1SC, 3, 589, two

DATE: 1952, 1966, Section 16(2, Section 16(2, Section 13(2, Section 16(2, 1947, '11, 1962, a rainy day, Section 16(2, Section 16(2, Section 16(2

ORDINAL: first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first

GPE: law.6, Workmen

PRODUCT: Lordship

TIME: the present Act 19 of 1952

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //