A.H.M. AllaudIn Vs. Additional Income-tax Officer, Tuticorin, Madras, and Others.

Decided On : Dec-05-1963

Court : Chennai

LAW: section 66(2, Section 50, section 34, section 49, section 34

DATE: the year 1946-47?'For, the previous year ending with December 31, 1945, 1947, 1947, May 23, 1955, 1,45,828, 1948, May 26, 1948, the year 1946-47, the 31st December, 1945, July 12, 1948.There, December 4, 1951, the assessment year 1946-47, Almost two years later, December 4, 1951, December 4, 1951, May 26, 1948, May 26, 1948, May 26, 1948, May 26, 1948.In, May 26, 1948, May 26, 1948, December 4, 1951, May 26, 1948.'It, May 26, 1948, December 4, 1951, May 26, 1948, four years, the last day, the financial year, the previous year, four years, May 26, 1948, the relevant year, May 26, 1948, years, all assessments years, four years, the period of, four years, May 26, 1948, 1951, about 1955, four years, four years, the period of, four years, 1959, 1959, 1962

NORP: Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, British, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian

CARDINAL: 1,20,346, 1,07,678-8, 12,667-8, 2,21,756, 1,07,678-8, 455-8, 1,07,223, half, two, 43,769, 53,306, one, 1, 3, 4, 5, 3, 4, two, as section 50, 4, one, one, 250.Two, 533

ORDINAL: first, first

ORG: Ceylon, Ceylon, Ceylon, Madurai, Ceylon, Ceylon, Appellate, Tribunal, Appellate, the High Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Government of India, the Calcutta High Court, Burmah Oil Company, Raleigh Investment, Raleigh Investment, Appellate, Tribunal, the High Court, the Ceylon Double Taxation Relief Rules, the Calcutta High Court, Ceylon, the foreign Government, the Appellate Tribunal

TIME: 2,93,247

GPE: Ceylon, Ceylon, India, Ceylon, Ceylon, Ceylon, the United Kingdom, Bombay, Ceylon, India

PERSON: Ranganathan

WORK_OF_ART: Tax Case No.