Semantic Analysis by spaCy
R. Sundararama Sastri Vs. M. Anantha Krishna Niadu
Decided On : Oct-27-1916
Court : Chennai
LAW: Section 14, Section 13
PERSON: Sadasiva Aiyar, J.1, Ramanathan Chettiar, Saminatha Aiyar, Exhibit XX, P. W. No, Sundararaja Aiyangar, .defendant, Nambis, Nirvaham, J.5, Subordinate, Justice Shephard, Shephard, Dorasami Ayyar, Annasami Ayyar, Chettiar, Saminatha Aiyar, Neithir, Gopalaswamy Naidu, Chettiar, Saminathan Aiyar, Rangaohari, D. Sundararaja Iyengar, Rangachari
CARDINAL: 14, 520, 8, 8, three, five, one, three, 8, 1, three, 30, two, 1, 5,000, 1, three, 1, 2, 3, two, One, one, 11, 236, one, 21, three, 183, 23, two, one, 23, 185, 14, 520, 1, 100, 2, 1,000, 24, six, 5,000, 5, 11, 19, 11, more than one, one, two
DATE: 13th July 1910, 04, the 13th and 16th August 1910, years, monthly, a few months, the end of August 1910, April 1911, the 23rd April 1911, the 2th June 1910, the 28th June 1910, the 24th April 1911, the day, 1863, fifteen days, February 1911
GPE: Devastanam, Devastanam, Judges, Nataraja, Judges, Devastanam, Ramanathan, Ponduranga, Narasimha, treated1
TIME: long minutes, half an hour
ORG: Magistrate, Madura, Devastanam, Ananthakrishna Naicker', Devastanam, Court, Court, Advocate-General, Narasimha Chariar v. Muthukumarasamy Mudaliar, the High Court, Court, Seshadri Ayyangar, Advocate-General, Court, Court, Court, the temple committee, Devastanam, Tahsildars, the Indian Bank, Advocate-General, Nagappa 12 M.S 366, Advocate-General, Advocate-General, a Criminal Court, Advocate-General, Court
ORDINAL: third, 24th, first, first, first, first, 20th, first, first, second
PRODUCT: Vakils
NORP: Devastanam, Subba Naidu
LANGUAGE: Sethu