Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

R. Sundararama Sastri Vs. M. Anantha Krishna Niadu

Decided On : Oct-27-1916

Court : Chennai

LAW: Section 14, Section 13

PERSON: Sadasiva Aiyar, J.1, Ramanathan Chettiar, Saminatha Aiyar, Exhibit XX, P. W. No, Sundararaja Aiyangar, .defendant, Nambis, Nirvaham, J.5, Subordinate, Justice Shephard, Shephard, Dorasami Ayyar, Annasami Ayyar, Chettiar, Saminatha Aiyar, Neithir, Gopalaswamy Naidu, Chettiar, Saminathan Aiyar, Rangaohari, D. Sundararaja Iyengar, Rangachari

CARDINAL: 14, 520, 8, 8, three, five, one, three, 8, 1, three, 30, two, 1, 5,000, 1, three, 1, 2, 3, two, One, one, 11, 236, one, 21, three, 183, 23, two, one, 23, 185, 14, 520, 1, 100, 2, 1,000, 24, six, 5,000, 5, 11, 19, 11, more than one, one, two

DATE: 13th July 1910, 04, the 13th and 16th August 1910, years, monthly, a few months, the end of August 1910, April 1911, the 23rd April 1911, the 2th June 1910, the 28th June 1910, the 24th April 1911, the day, 1863, fifteen days, February 1911

GPE: Devastanam, Devastanam, Judges, Nataraja, Judges, Devastanam, Ramanathan, Ponduranga, Narasimha, treated1

TIME: long minutes, half an hour

ORG: Magistrate, Madura, Devastanam, Ananthakrishna Naicker', Devastanam, Court, Court, Advocate-General, Narasimha Chariar v. Muthukumarasamy Mudaliar, the High Court, Court, Seshadri Ayyangar, Advocate-General, Court, Court, Court, the temple committee, Devastanam, Tahsildars, the Indian Bank, Advocate-General, Nagappa 12 M.S 366, Advocate-General, Advocate-General, a Criminal Court, Advocate-General, Court

ORDINAL: third, 24th, first, first, first, first, 20th, first, first, second

PRODUCT: Vakils

NORP: Devastanam, Subba Naidu

LANGUAGE: Sethu

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //