Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Mangayarkarasi Apparels Pvt. Ltd., Millers Road, Bangalore and anr. Vs. Sundaram Finance Ltd., Pattullos Road, Chennai

Decided On : Apr-30-2002

Court : Chennai

Notice (8): Undefined index: topics [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 36]
Warning (2): Invalid argument supplied for foreach() [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 39]

LAW: Article 227 of The Constitution of India, Article 227 of The Constitution, section 9, Section 22, Section 22, Section 22, section 22, section 22, the SICA Act, Article 227 of The Constitution.8, section 22, Section 22, Section 22(1, the SICA Act, Article 227, Article 227, Section 5 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, Section 34, Article 226, Article 227, Article 227, Article 227 of the Constitution, C)Whether Section 5, section 22, Article 227, section 15, section 15, section 22, Article 12 of The Constitution, Article 12 of The Constitution, The Arbitrator, Article 226/227, Article 136(1, Constitution, Article 136(1, Article 136(I, Constitution, Constitution, Article 136(1, Constitution, Constitution, Article 136, Article 136, Article 136, Article 136, Article 136, Article 163, Article 136'.21, Section 10A, Article 226, Article 226, Article 136, Article 226(1, Section 10A, Article 136, Article 226, Section 10A, Article 227, Section 10A, Section 23, Article 136, Article 136, Article 136, Article 136, Article 136, the Evidence Act, Rule 6(5, Article 226 of The Constitution, Article 226/227, Article 226 or, Article 227, Article 226/227.28, Article 227, Article 227, Article 227, Article 227, Article 227 of the Constitution of India, Article 227 of the Constitution, Article 227, Article 227 of the Constitution in cases of, Article 227, Constitution, Article 227.33, Article 227, Section 5 of the Arbitration Act, Section 5, Article 226/227.36, Section 22, the Arbitration Agreement, Section 22, section 22, Section 29, Section 22, section 11, Section 22, the SICA Act, the Arbitration Act, Section 22(1, Article 227, Section 5, Article 226/227 of The Constitution and Section 22

PERSON: Padmanabhan, Y.K. Rajagopal, Y.K. Rajagopal, S.R.Rajagopal, biased.10, Cas 483, Burn Standard, M.S.Krishnan, M.S.Krishnan, S.R.Rajagopal, S.R.Rajagopal, Y.K.Rajagopal, P.N. Sharma, Anr, Bench, Goyal, Shankar Mehta, Thakur Raghuraj Singh, Anr, Mahajan, Gajendragadkar, J., Agio Countertrade Pte Lid, Lakshmi Chand, Bench, Shankar Mehta, Raghuraj Sing, J., Kihoto Hollohan v. Zachillhu, Bench, Harinagar Sugar Mills Ltd., Shyam Sundar Jhunjhunwala35, J., Rebello, J., J., Anr, P.N. Sharma, Anr, Y.K.Rajagopal, Estralla Rubber, Dass Estate, Achutananda Baidya v., Kumar Gayen, Law, O.C. Krishnan, Agio Countertrade Pte. Ltd.

CARDINAL: 1, 25.1.1996, 27.3.2001, 6, 89, 2, 227, 15, 27.3.2001.16, 2001.17, 20.7.2001, two, two, 227, Five, No.2, one, Three, 640, 640)11, Five, 19.The, 24, Five, 362, one, one, 25, 226, two, 226, 227, two, 22(1, 42.

DATE: 25.9.2001, 1996, 25.9.2001, 1985, 2001, 1985, 1985, 1985, 1997, 1985, 1985, No.248 of 2001, 25th June 2001, 22.12.2001, 1985, '20, Today, 1964.'22, recent years, 36, 386-87, 1996, 1996, 1996, '31, '32, 1985, 1985, 1985, 1985, 1994

ORG: Arbitration Case R.R, Arbitration Clause, Rs.6,56,03,729, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, Arbitration Agreement, Company, the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, the Arbitral Tribunal, Recovery Proceedings, the Delhi High Court, Lloyd Insulations, Cement Corporation of India 1997, Rishab Agro Industries Ltd., Capital Services Ltd., the Calcutta High Court, Dermoit International, Arbitration, the Delhi High Court, Award, the Bombay High Court, Anuptech Equipments Pvt., Ltd., Housing Society Ltd., the Apex Court, RohtasIndusries, Revision, the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions, Hire Purchase, Hire Purchase, the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, Bar, Arbitration, The Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions, Arbitration, Court, Tribunal, the High Court, Associated Cement Companies Ltd., the Apex Court, Tribunal, State, State, the Apex Court, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, Hind Cycles Ltd., the Apex Court, Bharat Bank Ltd., Delhi v. Employees, the Bharat Bank Ltd., the Industrial Tribunal, Tribunal, Industrial Tribunals, Industrial Tribunal, State, State, State, State, the Industrial Tribunals, Rohtas Industries Ltd., Rohtas Industries Staff Union, the Apex Court, Engineering Mavloor Sabhal, the High Courts, Bar, the Apex Court, Punjab Iron and Steel Co., Ltd., the Apex Court, the Bharat Bank Ltd, Bharat Bank Ltd., State, State, Court, Tribunal, State, State, Customs Authorities, Motor Vehicles Authorities, State, the Apex Court, State, the Administration of Justice, State, State, State, State, Stamp, Tribunal, Court, Associated Cement Companies Ltd., P.N., Court, State, the State Government, State, the State Government, the Apex Court, the Bombay High Court, Anuptech, Court, Court, the Bombay High Court, the Apex Court, The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, the Apex Court, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, the Legislative Policy, The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, the Supreme Court Judgments, Hind Cycles Ltd., Rohtas Industries Ltd., Rohtas Industries Staff Union, Associated Cement Companies, Hire Purchase, the Supreme Court, the High Court, The High Court, the High Court, the High Court, The High Court, the Apex Court, the High Court, the High Court, High Court, Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Punjab National Bank, the Apex Court, Recovery of Debts, Banks and Financial Institutions, Court, High Court, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, the Sick Company's, The Arbitration Proceedings, Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions, the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions, Maharashtra Tubes, State Industrial Investment Corporation, the Apex Court, Creditor, Punjab Iron & Steel Co. Ltd, the Apex Court, Arbitration Proceedings, Court, Shri Ananta Udyog Private Ltd., Cholamandalam Investment & Finance Company ltd, the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions, an Application No.2307, the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions, Division Bench.41, C & D, The Civil Revision Petition

PERCENT: 24%

ORDINAL: first, 4th, second

GPE: Delhi, Mahajan

PRODUCT: Mukherjee

MONEY: 950 SR 459

NORP: Hidayatullah

View Full Judgment


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //