Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. A. Meenakshi and ors.

Decided On : Mar-04-2009

Court : Chennai

LAW: Section 95 of the Motor Vehicles Act, Chapter, Section 108, Section 147, Chapter, Section 147 of the Motor Vehicles Act, Section 95, Chapter, Section 147, Section 95 of the 1939 Act, the Insurance Act, Section 14 of the I.R.D.A. Act, the Insurance Act, the Insurance Act, Section 147 of the Act, the Motor Vehicles Act, the Motor Vehicles Act, Section 95, Act 56 of 1969, Section 95, Section 95, Section 95, Section II, Section 95, Section 95, Section 95, Section 95, Section 95, Section 95, Section 95 of the 1939, Article 14 of the Constitution of India, Section 64U of the Insurance Act, Section 95, Section 2, Section 95 of the 1939 Act, the Motor Vehicles Act, Motor Vehicles Act, Section 6, Section 94, the Motor Vehicles Act, Chapter VIII, Section 95 of the Act, Section 95, Section II(1)(a, Section 95 of the Act, Section 95, Section 2(i, Motor Vehicle Act, the 2002 Tariff, Section 147, Section II

PERSON: Prabha Sridevan, Cardozo, Shakuntla Devi, G. Saravanan, Hire, Schedule, Purshottam Udeshi v., Harshavardhatiya Rudraditya, Counsel, Santosh Gupta, Insurer, Tilak Singh, Singh, Tilak Singh's, Singh, Asha Rani, Tilak Singh's, Asha Rani's, Rajinder Singh, Asha Rani's, M. Laxmi, Asha Rani's, M. Laxmi's Case, M. Laxmi's, Tilak Singh's, Asha Rani's, Kaushalya Devi Thapar, Purshottam Udeshi, Bench.22, C.M. Jaya, Bench, Shanti Bai, Amritlal Sood's, Kaushalya Devi's, Kaushalya Devi's, Bhagyalakshmi, Schedule, Tilak Singh's, Tilak Singh's, RW1, Mathew Joseph v. Janaki, Tilak Singh, Ajayakumar 1999, Dashrath R. Bhagat, Nagpur, K. Kannan, N. Vijayaraghavan, K. Gopalakrishnan v., Madras, Lal Sood's, Bench, M. Laxmi's, Manubhai Dharmasinhbhai Gajera.29, P.9, Rs, Dharmasinhbhai Gajera's

CARDINAL: 1, three, two, one, 25,00,000/-, five, more.3, 19,10,000/-, 2002]1SCR621, one, one, 1, 2)-(i, 1, one, one, fifty thousand, six, fifty thousand, fifteen thousand, six thousand, 1, 2)-(i, 1, 1, six thousand, 2)(i, 1, two, 343, 15.000, 15,000, 15,000, 15,000, 27,500, 15,000, 15,000.00, 2, 1, 1978INSURANCE, 38, 1977.Sd, 585, 13.3.1978, three, 3, 8), 276, Two, 2.6.1986, 1998]2SCR284, 218, 275, 278, 420, 566, 10, 1977]3SCR372, three, 2002]1SCR298, five, 1995]1SCR871, 10, two, 1, 51, two, 227, 11, 2, 1, 807, two, 2, five, 11, 2008)10SCC404, one-third, 17, 18,70,000/-, 19,10,000/-, 87,000/-, 40,000/-, one-third, 13, 17,76,658/-, 25,000/-, 18,50,000/-, 10,000/-, 18,70,000/-, 10,000/-, 20,000/-, 19,10,000/-, 1

DATE: 30.7.2004, 1939, 1923, 8 of 1923, 1988, four months, 1988, 1938, 2002, 1938, the fateful day, 1977, 1939, 1960, 1939, 1923, three calendar months, 1978, 17th March, 25th March, years, 25th March, 1977, 1985, the year 1970, 1978, 1978, 1978, 1978, 2002, the year 1978, 2002, 2008, 2.6.1986, 1939, 1939, 19.9.2006, 25.9.2007, 2007, 2008, 1994, 1995, 1989, 2008, 1977, 1969, 1987, 1977, 1978, 1977, 1977, 1978, annual, annual, 1,22,400/-, 1,22,400/-, only 36 years old, annual, just two years, 7,000/- per month, 10,000/- per month, his thirties, one year, annual, 2009

ORG: India Motor Tariff, The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Haryana Financial Corporation, Jagdamba Oil Mills, the Supreme Court, liability.-, liability.-, and(b, New India Assurance Co., Motor Insurance, the Tariff Advisory Committee, Authority, the Tariff Advisory Committee, Motor, IMT, The Tariff Advisory Committee, Package Policies, Reliability Trials, Motor Trade, Company, Insured, Insured, The Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Motor Vehicles Act, Company, Company, Counsel, Clauses 1, Clauses 1, the Supreme Court, the Tariff Advisory Committee, the Gujarat High Court, Jyotindra Chimanlal, Scale of compensation(1, the Gujarat High Court, the Tariff Advisory Committee, LIABILITY, the Tariff Advisory Committee, the Indian Motor Tariff, The Gujarat High Court, the Tariff Advisory Committee, AIR 1977 SC 1735, M.A.C.T., AIR 1977 SC 1735, the Tariff Advisory Committee, the Supreme Court, The Tariff Advisory, Circular, Package, A.C.J., Sagar Chand Phool, the Delhi High Court, the Delhi High Court, Circular, the Delhi High Court, the Tribunal on 31.5.1979, The Delhi High Court, the Tariff Advisory Committee, The Delhi High Court, the Delhi High Court, the Tariff Advisory Committee, the National Insurance Company.14, The Delhi High Court, the Tariff Advisory Committee, Circular, the Tariff Advisory Committee, the Tariff Advisory Committee Circular, the Motor Trade.(b, the Tariff Advisory Committee Circular, IMT, the Gujarat High Court ', the Supreme Court, United India Insurance Co. Ltd., The Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, New India Assurance Co. Ltd., the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, New India Assurance Co. Ltd., the Supreme Court, United Insurance Co. Ltd., The Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Learned Counsel, the High Court, the Tariff Advisory Committee, The Clarification/Circular, andThere, Circular, Comprehensive Policy, Comprehensive Policy, The Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, The High Court, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, the Division Bench, Black's Law Dictionary, 5th Edn, Miller v. Boston Ins, Company, Company, General Exceptions, the High Court, The High Court, Court, Ginning & Pressing Co., Comprehensive, New India Assurance Co. Ltd., the Supreme Court, New India Assurance Co. Ltd., United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd., Lakshmamma C.M.A. No, Company, Bar v. National Insurance Co. Ltd., the Calcutta High Court, ILR2007KAR5307 Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd., B.M. Niranjan, the Insurance Company, the Motor Cycle, the Insurance Policy, the Motor Cycle, Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., Legislature, United India Insurance Co. Limited, Court, the Insurance Company, the Supreme Court, the Gujarat High Court, A.C.J., Kailash, Haryana High Court, Haryana High Court, Haryana High Court, Tribunal, the Tariff Advisory Committee, the Tariff Advisory Commitee's, Tariff, TAC, Insurers, TAC, Insurers, the Supreme Court, A.C.J. 34, National Insurance Co. Ltd., V. Vasantha, the High Court, the Supreme Court, Comprehensive Policy, the Comprehensive Policy, TAC, Circular, TAC, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Mediclaim Policy, the Supreme Court, T)he, the Regulatory Authority, United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Act, Insurance Company, TAC, Circular, Mourind Automation Private Limited, Exs, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Tribunal at Rs, Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, Sagar Chand Phool Chand Jain's, the Supreme Court, State, the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, the Insurance Company, Tribunal, the Motor Accidents Claims, M.P. No

ORDINAL: third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, Third, second, THIRD, third, third, third, first, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third

EVENT: the Workmen's Compensation Act, the English Road Traffic Act, the Workmen's Compensation Act, Section II, the Workmen's Compensation Act, 'Section II, Section II

GPE: vehicle;](b, Clause, India, India, India, Pushpabai, Bombay, Pushpabai, Pushpabai, Pushpabai, Pushpabai, Singh, Counsel, Ajayakumar, KLT, Clause, Clause, Appukuttan, KLT, Appukuttan, Pushpabai, Kumar, Pushpabai, Pushpabai, C.M. Jaya, Ex, Ex, I.R.D.A., Hindi

WORK_OF_ART: Requirements of Policies and Limits of Liability, 'Private Car (Comprehensive, a Comprehensive Policy, a Comprehensive Policy, a Comprehensive Policy, The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal

LOC: Jammu, Policy, the Bombay Region, the Bombay Region, Policy, Policy, Policy, Policy, Policy, Policy, Policy, Policy

PRODUCT: 30.6.2002, the Motor Car, Motor TradeThe, Amritlal Sood, a Full Bench, The Full Bench, 845, A.C.J. 887, Court.33

LANGUAGE: English, English, English

NORP: Indian, Punjab, Punjab, Punjab

FAC: Amritlal Sood's, Amritlal Sood's, Amritlal Sood's, Comprehensive