Eternit Everest Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Decided On : Jun-25-1996

Court : Chennai

LAW: Section 11D, Section 11A, Section 11D of the Act, Section 11D of the Act, Chapter 68, Section 5A, Chapter 68, the Tariff Act, Chapter 68, the Tariff Act, Section 11D of the Act, Constitution, Section 11D, Section 11A of the Act, Section 11D, Section 11A, Article 265 of the Constitution of India, Article 265 of the constitution, Section 11D of the Act, Section 11A, Section 11D, Article 265 of the Constitution of India, Section 11D of the Act, Section 11D of the Act, Section 11D of the Act, Article 14 of the Constitution of India, Section 11A of the Act, Section 11D, Section 11D of the Act, Constitution, Article 14 of the Constitution of India, Section 11D of the Act, Article 248 and Entry, Section 11D of the Act, Section 11A of the Act, Section 11A of the Act, Constitution, Section 11A, Section 11D, a Constitution Bench, Section 11(2, Section 8B(2, Section 11(2, Section 11(2, Section 11(2, Section 19 and Section 20, Section 21, Section 20, Section 11(1, Section 11(2, Section 20, Section 11, Section 11(2, Section 20A, Constitution, Entry 54 List II, Constitution, Section 20A, Section 20A, Section 11D, Constitution, Section 11D. 52, Section 11D, Central Excise Act, Section 28B, the Customs Act, Section 11D, Section 28B, the Customs Act, Article 248, a Constitution Bench, Section 17 of the Act, Section 8, Section 5(1)(a)(iii, Section 17, Section 17, Section 17, Section 17, Section 4, Section 5 of the Act, Section 17, Section 17, Section 17, Section 17, Section 17, Section 17, Section 3, the Industrial Disputes Act, Section 17, the Industrial Disputes Act, Section 11, the Industrial Disputes Act, Section 17, Section 11, Section 8, Section 11, Section 17, Section 11, Section 17, Section 17, Section 17, the Payment of Wages Act, the Industrial Disputes Act, Section 17, Section 17, Section 17, Section 17, Section 17, Section 17, a Constitution Bench, Article 19(1)(f, Constitution, Article 14 of the Constitution, Section 5A, Article 19(1)(f, Constitution, Section 3, another Constitution Bench, Cess Revision Act, Article 14 of the Constitution, Section 48, Section 48, Section 48, Section 48, Section 48, Section 48, Section 48, Section 10(2)(i, Section 10(2)(f, Section 48(2, Section 48(2, Section 48(2, Section 48(2, Section 48, Section 48(2, Section 48, Section 48(2, Section 11D, Section 11A of the Act, Article 265 of the Constitution of India, Article 265 of the Constitution of India, Constitution, Section 33, Section 10(3)(a)(iii, Section 10 of the Act, Section 10(3)(a, Section 10(3)(a, Section 14(1)(e, Section 14B, Section 25B, Section 11B of the Act, Constitution, a Constitution Bench, Section 37(1, Section 46(2, Constitution, Section 11D, Section 11D, Article 248, Constitution, Constitution, Section 11D, Section 11D of the Act, Article 14 of the Constitution of India, Central Act 40/1991, Section 11B, Section 11D, Chapter III, Section 11, Section 11B, Central Act 40/91, Section 37, Section 11B, Section 11D, Section 11A of the Act, Section 11D, Section 11D of the Act, Section 11A of the Act, Section 11A, Section 11A, Section 11A, Section 11A of the Act, Section 11D, Section 11D, Section 11D, Section 11A, Section 11A of the Act, Section 11D, Section 11A, Section 11D, Section 11A, Section 11A of the Act, Section 11D, Section 11A, Section 11A, Section 11A, Section 11D of the Act, Section 11A, Section 11D, Section 11D, Section 11D, Section 11D, Section 11D of the Act, Section 11D of the Act, Section 11D

ORG: ORDERD, W.P. Nos, W.P. No, 30.6.1992, Notice, Podanur, The Central Government, Notfn, Notfn, UT Products, UT Products, Central Revenue Control Laboratory, UT Products, UT Products, the Central Government, UT Products, UT Products, UT Products, the Depot Challans, Court, Court, Parliament, UT Products, UT Products, UT Products, Depot, Reliance, the Andhra Pradesh High Court, ELT, AP, Collector of Customs, Government, UT Products, UT Products, UT Products, Parliament, Parliament, the Central Government, Authorities, Quader & Co., Hyderabad, the Supreme Court, the Hyderabad General Sales Tax Act, the Madras General Sales Tax Act, the State Legislature, the State Legislature, Legislature, Lists, Lists, the Legislative Entry, Legislature, Legislature, Legislature, Magistrate, Magistrate of the First Class, Magistrate, State, the State Legislature, the State Legislature under Entry, Ashoka Marketing Ltd., State of Bihar, the Apex Court, State, State, State Legislature, State, the Apex Court, State, the Bihar Sales Tax Act, The State Legislature, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, the State Legislature, Court, State, State, Court, State, Union of India, the Andhra Pradesh High Court, the Central Government, Parliament, the Central Government, Others v. Union of India and Others, Court, Parliament, the Apex Court, Union of India, Parliament, Parliament, Kasturi, the Apex Court, the Working Journalists (Conditions of Service, the Wage Board, the Central Government, Court, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, the Wage Board, the Court of the amount, the State Government, the State Government, Court, the State Government, Court, Tribunal, the State Government, the Boards, Courts, Boards, Courts, the State Government, the Wage Board, the Wage Board, a Civil Court, the State Government, the Wage Board, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, the Government of Bombay, the State Government, the Apex Court, Travancore-Cochin Land Tax Act, Sections 4, Civil Court, Government, Bar, the Assessing Authority, Civil Court, the Assessing Authority, State of Andhra Pradesh, the Apex Court, the Andhra Pradesh Land Revenue, State, the Bombay High Court, the Administration of Evacuee Property Act, Legislature, Court, Court, Legislature, Legislature, Legislature, Legislature, Legislature, Legislature, Legislature, Court, the Administration of Evacuee Property Act, the Civil Courts, a Civil Court, Court, Parliament, the Advocate-General, the Advocate General, Gem Cables and Conductors Ltd., Collector of Customs, Hyderabad, Court, Court, Court, the Union of India, Apex Court, Courts, Income Tax, Calcutta, Maxwell, the Interpretation of Statutes, Parliament, Parliament, Sections 33B and 34(3, Hameedia Hardware Stores, the Apex Court, The State Legislature, the State Legislature, Court, Court, Seaford Court Estates Ltd., Aaher, Parliament, Court, Court, Court, Delhi Transport Corporation, DTC, Mazdoor Congress and Others, Singh Kalra v. Union of India, the Apex Court, Court, Sections 14B, Court, Hameedia Hardware Stores, Court, Court, Parliament, Quader & Co., AIR 1972, SC 946, Ashoka Marketing Ltd., State of Bihar, the State Legislature under Entry, Parliament, Judges of, the Supreme Court, the Bombay Sales Tax Act, Gujarat State, The Apex Court, the State Legislature, Social Justice, State, State, Parliament, Union, State Legislations, Parliament, Central Excises, Parliament, the Andhra Pradesh High Court, Central Government, the Central Government :, the Appellate Tribunal, Court, the Central Government, the Central Government, the Assistant Collector of Central Excise, the Central Government, the Central Government, the Central Government, the Central Government, Statute, Statute, Court, Statute, the Apex Court, Court, the Union of India, the Central Government, Central Government

NORP: J.1, Central Excise, R., Custodian, Custodian, Custodian, Custodian, Custodian, Custodian, Custodian, Custodian, Custodian, Custodian, Custodian, Custodian, Custodian, Custodian, Hon'ble, R., M. Pentish, Statute, R., Central Excise, Central Excise

CARDINAL: one, 2,47,05,641.22, 1, 1968/93, 3436/28.12.1992, 2, 9785/93, 888/23.4.1993 2,46,51,772/-, 1/94 5, 15337/94, 1258/25.7.1994, 6/94 6, 1897/13.12.1994, 7/94, 10/94 7, 774/4.5.1995 2,15,08,994/- 11/94 to 2/95, 1599/8.9.1995, 3/95, 7/952, four, 60, 26/92, 1.3.1992, 3., 30.12.1991, 3.2.1992, 4, 27.7.1991, 5., 84, 6, 23, 351, 6, 8, 84, 9, 97, 265, 10, 1964]6SCR867, 46, 2, 54, six, 54, 6, 7, 13, 8), 3, 4, 5, 3, 4, 5, 8), 3, 4, 5, 7, 13, 6, 7, 13, 1964]6SCR867, 7, 13, 12, 1993(67)ELT769(AP, 84, 84, 84, 1, 1, 1, only one, 1, 1, 13, 1995]215ITR371(Mad, one, 1972]83ITR582(SC, 97, 7, 8, 1, 2, 9, 12, 15, 1961]3SCR77, 1, 2, 3, 4, 1967]3SCR28, 16, two, 23, 37, 17, 1994(72)ELT848(Mad, one, one, 4, 75, 75, 18, 265, 19, 1980]121ITR535(SC, Two, 12, 33, four, two, 1988]3SCR384, 281, 3, one, two, two, 11, 2, 155, 12, 1961]2SCR295, 1978)ILLJ349SC, 1, 600, 119, 125, 1991]1SCR364, 5, 19, 1988]3SCR384, 1964]6SCR867, 21, 1978]1SCR338, seven, 46, 1964]6SCR867, 22, 97, more than one, 84, 97, 23, 20.9.1991, 2, 1, 20.9.1991, 2, 37, three, 24, 25, 2, 4, 26

DATE: 1944, 11017, 11018 of 1992, 1992, 1906, 13.7.1992, 1.2.1992, 1944, 1992, 2,17,46,031/ - 7/92, 2115/22.9.1993, 1985, 25.7.1991, 16.11.1989, 1985, 1992, February, 1992, 25.7.1991, 25.6.1991, 1944, about November, 1992, Section 11D, 13.7.1992, Section 11D, 1988, 1940, 1939, 1922, 1959, '51, Section 11D(1, 1995CriLJ426, 1955, '5, 1947, 1947, 200/- per month, under Section 17, 1955, 1864, annual, about five years ago, 1962, 1950, 1954, today, today, today, '10, 1948, 1949, 1991, 1959, 1257, 1959, '24, daily, Section 11D, Section 11D, 17.11.1980, Section 11B, 1926

ORDINAL: fourth, third, third, first, first, third, first, second, first, second, second, first, first, third, third, third, second, secondly, 7th, 4th

GPE: O.S., O.C., India, Kymore, Madhya Pradesh, Bombay, West Bengal, New Delhi, India, Sri Soli Sorabjee, India, India, India, Sons v. Salivateswaran, Kerala, L.C., L.J., India, Ashoka, Ashoka, Luxmi, Subordinate, us, A.C.

QUANTITY: 3,17,59,137- 4/93 to 8/93 4

PERSON: O.C., Schedule, V.T. Gopalan, Articles 14, Schedule, Abdul Quader, Abdul Quader's, No.(2, K.M. Vijayan, Amratlal Prajivandas, Statute, List I. 14, K.T. Moopil Nair v. State, Raja Reddy, D.B. Godbole, Kunwar Rajnath, M.C. Chagla, Law, Law Lord, Maneckshaw, S. Benjamin v., Ebrahim Aboobaker, Art, Loreburn, B. Mohan Lal Sowcar, Abdul Rahman's, AIR1984, Muddala Veeramallappa, Beg, R. Rajappa, Supp, B. Mohan Lal Sowcar, Sirajul Haq Khan v. Sunni Central Board, R.S. Joshi v. Ajit Mills, V.R. Krishna Iyer, J., Abdul Quader, Whitney, Dunedin

FAC: Tamil Nadu, South India Corporation, Seventh Schedule

PRODUCT: Calcutta, Calcutta, a Full Bench, Central Excise Officers

PERCENT: more than 25%, more than 25%, more than 25%, less than 25%, more than 25%, 25%, 15%

LOC: Madras, Executive

EVENT: Sections 28, List II, Sections 14B to 14D'

WORK_OF_ART: 54 List II, 54 List II, Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board

MONEY: 54 List II