Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Gnanambika Mills Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Madras.

Decided On : Aug-25-1965

Court : Chennai

LAW: section 28(1)(c, section 28, section 28, section 28, section 28, section 28, section 28, section 28, section 28, section 28, section 28, section 28, section 28, section 28, section 28, section 28

CARDINAL: 32,000, 32,000, 77,641, 32,098, half, 5, 3,53,205, about 57, half, one, one, two, two, two, two, 5, 28.The, 250

ORG: Appellate, Tribunal, Tribunal, Appellate, Vallakkinar, Coimbatore, The South Indian Mill Owners Association, Appellate, Tribunal, Tribunal, Sons v. Commissioners of Income-tax, M. Hussain Ali & Sons v. Commissioners of Income-tax, Gujarat High Court, Money & Co., the South Indian Mill Owners Association

DATE: 1922, that year, the year, 1964, the relevant year, between April 24 and July 31, 1948, April 22, 1948, a few months earlier, the year, 1964

WORK_OF_ART: Tax Case No, The Noble Lord

QUANTITY: about 468 bales

PERSON: M. Hussain Ali, Miller, P. K. Kalasami Nadar v. Commissioners, P. K. Kalasami Nadar v. Commissioner, Srinivasan JJ., L. H. Vora, Haji Abdul Rahman, Abdul Qayum v. Commissioner, levy penalty, C. A. Abraham v. Income-tax Officer, Kottayam

NORP: Indian

GPE: Jagadisan, Kerala

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //