Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Gnanambika Mills Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Madras.
Decided On : Aug-25-1965
Court : Chennai
LAW: section 28(1)(c, section 28, section 28, section 28, section 28, section 28, section 28, section 28, section 28, section 28, section 28, section 28, section 28, section 28, section 28, section 28
CARDINAL: 32,000, 32,000, 77,641, 32,098, half, 5, 3,53,205, about 57, half, one, one, two, two, two, two, 5, 28.The, 250
ORG: Appellate, Tribunal, Tribunal, Appellate, Vallakkinar, Coimbatore, The South Indian Mill Owners Association, Appellate, Tribunal, Tribunal, Sons v. Commissioners of Income-tax, M. Hussain Ali & Sons v. Commissioners of Income-tax, Gujarat High Court, Money & Co., the South Indian Mill Owners Association
DATE: 1922, that year, the year, 1964, the relevant year, between April 24 and July 31, 1948, April 22, 1948, a few months earlier, the year, 1964
WORK_OF_ART: Tax Case No, The Noble Lord
QUANTITY: about 468 bales
PERSON: M. Hussain Ali, Miller, P. K. Kalasami Nadar v. Commissioners, P. K. Kalasami Nadar v. Commissioner, Srinivasan JJ., L. H. Vora, Haji Abdul Rahman, Abdul Qayum v. Commissioner, levy penalty, C. A. Abraham v. Income-tax Officer, Kottayam
NORP: Indian
GPE: Jagadisan, Kerala