Misrimal Hansraj Vs. Union of India (Uoi), Represented by the Assistant Collector of Customs

Decided On : Apr-11-1974

Court : Chennai

LAW: Section 135, the Customs Act, the Customs Officers, Section 112, Section 111, Section 112, Section 137, Section 135, Section 135, Section 135, the Customs Officers, Section 123, the Customs Act, Section 135, Section 135 of the Act, Section 111,he, Section 135, Section 111 of the Act, Section 111.18, Section 2, Section 111 or Section 113, Section 135, Section 342, Section 342, Section 123 of the Act, Section 135 of the Act, Section 540, Section 540, Section 111 of the Act, Section 123 of the Act, Section 167, Section 135 of the Act, Section 111 of the Act, Section 111 of the Act.30, Section 517, Section 517, Section 517, Section 135, the Indian Penal Code, Section 5, the Criminal Procedure Code, the Customs Act, Section 135 of the Act, the Customs Act, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 104 of the Act, the Criminal Procedure Code, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 138, Section 135, Section 105 of the Act, the Criminal Procedure Code, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 517, Section 135 of the Act, Section 517, Section 517, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 137, Section 135, Section 517, the Sea Customs Act, Section 188, Section 191, Section 135 of the Act, Article 20 of the Constitution, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 517, Section 126 of the Act, the Customs Act, Constitution, Section 517, the Customs Act, Section 517, Section 411, Indian Penal Code, the Customs Act, Section 517, Section 517

PERSON: N. Krishnaswamy Reddy, J.1, Misrimal Hansraj, Narayana Mudali Lane, George Town, Madras, Manmal Misrimal, Madras, Manmal, Chunilal, Exhibit P-3, duress.8, Dayabhai, Dayabhai, Exhibit P-5, Madras, Exhibit P-9, Magistrate, Gazette, Officers, follows:.It, S. Sundar, Aiyar, Gian Chand, Dayabhai, Kothari Building, Dayabhai, Sri S. Sundar, judicata.33, Schedule, levy penalty, excluded.39, Sri G. Ramaswami, Vesting, Sri G. Ramaswami, Sri G. Ramaswamy, Sri G. Ramaswami, Krishna Pillai, Krishna Pillai, K.K. Shaik Dawood v. Collector of Customs, Sri Nagaratnam

CARDINAL: 500, two, 221, 27, 8, 221, 18, 2 3, 1, one, one, 221, 27, 8, 27, 170, 15,796, 34, 34, only 34, 187, 13,600, 10,000, 34, 27, 8, 170, 27, 2,196, 1, 2, 34, 1, 17, 39, 20, two, 1968CriLJ231, 221, 18, 28, 46, 221, about 175, 18, one, 28, 195, Four, 9,265, 31, 44,800, three, 81, six, two, 5, 34, about 34, 34, 18, 28, two, 1, 2, One, 1, 2, 3, 4, 1, 2, two, One, two, two, 1, 137, 137, 215

WORK_OF_ART: M.O. 1, Officers, Schedule II, 1965 Mad, M.O. 1

ORG: State, Customs, P.W. 1 J Rama Rao, the Customs House, the Assistant Collector of Customs, Customs, the Customs Office, Strotten Muthiah Mudali Street, Customs, Customs, the Customs Department, the Assistant Collector of Customs, the Customs House, Company, the Assistant Collector of Customs, Customs, Department, Department, the Additional Collector of Customs, the Assistant Collector of Customs, Magistrate, Department, the Collector of Customs, The Criminal Court, Department, the Central Government, the Customs Authorities, the Customs Authorities, a Criminal Court, the Supreme Court, the Assistant Collector of Customs, Preventive Additional Chief Inspector, Preventive Additional Chief Inspector, the Additional Collector of Customs, the Customs Authorities under Section 135, the Customs Authorities, Court, the Supreme Court, the Lower Court, Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Court, the Customs Authorities, Court, Court, the Customs Authorities, the Supreme Court, The State of Punjab v., the Sea Customs Act, the Supreme Court, the Sea Customs Act, the Reserve Bank, The Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Court, Court, the Customs Authorities, Calcutta, the Customs Authorities, the Customs Authorities, Calcutta, the Customs Authorities, the Customs Authorities, Exhibit P-3, Magistrate, the Central Government, the Customs Department, Magistrate, the Central Government Sri G. Ramaswami, Department, Magistrate, Department, Magistrate, Department, Magistrate, Magistrate, the Customs Department, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Clauses, Magistrate, Customs, Court, Court, Court, Counsel for the Central Government, Court, Department, Court, Court, Department, Court, the Department, Court, Department, Department, Department, Department, Department, Court, Court, Department, Tribunal, Department, Court, Court, the Collector of Customs, the Collector of Customs, the Collector of Customs, Court, Department, Court, Court, the Customs Department, Department, Court, Court, Tribunal, Court, Counsel for the Central Government, State, Sections 188 and 191 of, the Privy Council, Department, Collector of Customs, Court, Counsel for the Central Government, Department, Department, Court, Court, Legislature, Court, Court, Court, Department, Counsel, the Central Government, Department, Court, the Central Government, the Central Government, Department, the Central Government, the Central Government, the State Government, the Central Government, the State Government, Court, Court, Court, Confiscated Goods', Central Government, Court, Court, Court, the Central Government under Section 126, the Central Government', the Central Government, the Central Government, the Central Government, the Central Government, the Central Government, the Central Government, the Central Government, the Central Government, the Central Government for Customs cases.42, Public Prosecutor v., Court, Court, State, the High Court, Court, the High Court, the Central Government, the Central Government', Court, Customs, the Supreme Court, Court, the Customs Department, Customs, Court, Magistrate, Customs, the Supreme Court, Court, the Customs Department, Court, Department, Department, the Supreme Court, Department, Department, Magistrate, the Criminal Procedure Code.47, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Department, Court, Department, the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Magistrate, the Central Government

DATE: 19th December, 1968, 24th January, 1971, 22nd January, 1970, 17th March, 1970, 30th March, 1971, 2nd August, 1971, 31st August, 19 71, next day, 1962, the year 1960 to 1968, the years 1962 to 1966, 1970, years, years, 1878, 1962, 1430 to 1442 of 1966, 1430 to 1442 of 1966

GPE: Preventive Officer, Bombay, invoices.10, Bombay, Bombay, Bombay, Bombay, Bombay, Bombay, Bombay, India, Jamatrai v. State, Bombay, Dolia, smuggled.26, Bombay, Bombay, Delhi, Bombay, Bombay, Bombay, Counsel, Counsel, Vesting, Gianchand v. Union

FAC: Narayana Mudali Lane, the Preventive Officers, Counsel Sri Nagaratnam, Counsel Sri Nagaratnam

LOC: Madras, Madras, Madras, Madras, the Central Revenue

PRODUCT: P.W. 1, M.O. 1 series, the Act LII of

NORP: P.Ws, non-existent.27

TIME: under this Act, night, under this Act '

ORDINAL: first, first, second, third, first, third, second